>>213907922
>that’s not how public corporations work
It absolutely is
Yes there are the shareholder priorities but they don’t translate into a granular plan that impacts every section unless you have an activist CEO who is willing to take on his workforce like Elon or Brian Armstrong
Staffing is policy
Small staffing decisions and inertia can change the whole character of a place
For instance a small mandate on diversity will have a massive impact. Here’s how:
“We need more diversity”
But blacks are inept and can’t do anything. There are a few who don’t fit this description but every corporation in America is fighting over them so they usually get snapped up by Goldman, Harvard, or Meta
So how do you hire them? Anyone who has worked in a large corporation will tell you that the HR department is wall-to-wall niggers
Why? Because it’s the easiest job to do with the murkiest KPI/OKR metrics so black incompetence doesn’t stand out as much.
But also, HR is the gate keeper of the company staffing under the VP level, so now you have retarded blacks deciding who the company hires and wouldn’t you know it, they think the place needs more blacks!
Angry young fat black women are hysterically hostile to straight white men and the fading edifice of DEI armed them with the language and tools to express this hostility in practice
So which whites do get hired? Emasculated redditors or straight up faggots.
Also, once a company is large enough for their legal department to handle the fixed cost of H1B compliance, they start exploiting this source of cheap labor
For whatever reason, pajeets, even FOB pajeets take to DEI nonsense like ducks to water, immediately adding bio pronouns and using absurd newspeak neologisms like “allowlist”
So even if a company isn’t leftist by character, structural stressors like diversity mandates and H1B incentives transform the workforce over time and with the workforce, the corp’s character
