← Home ← Back to /tv/

Thread 213919657

51 posts 20 images /tv/
Anonymous No.213919657 >>213919700 >>213920243 >>213920501 >>213920588 >>213920744 >>213921234 >>213921352 >>213921720 >>213921920
Blockbusterbros?
Anonymous No.213919700 >>213922042 >>213923162 >>213923768
>>213919657 (OP)
They were all a pain in the ass compared to broadband internet and they all smelled like cheap carpet glue. Fuck off with this nostalgiabait.
Anonymous No.213919914 >>213920002 >>213921299 >>213922041
Blockbuster didn't have one of these
Anonymous No.213920002 >>213923010
>>213919914
>always leads the detective to some seedy guy who knows who the sick child-killing antagonist is and where he can be found
kino
Anonymous No.213920202
This guy talks like a retard but I absolutely agree that those seedy pre-blockbuster places must've had a million times more soul than Blockbuster.
Anonymous No.213920243
>>213919657 (OP)
Imagine the smell
Anonymous No.213920430
Jewish experience vs white experience. Oy vey where is the depravity?
Anonymous No.213920501 >>213920552 >>213920581 >>213922302
>>213919657 (OP)
>Blockbusterbros?
entire weekend entertainment hinged on what was left in the store
Anonymous No.213920552
>>213920501
that child is a fucking goblin, what the hell
Anonymous No.213920581
>>213920501
>super smash bros is out of stock for 8 years straight
Anonymous No.213920588 >>213920671 >>213922024
>>213919657 (OP)
i wasn’t even live during this era, what would happen if they were out of cassette tapes of the movie you wanted to borrow?
Anonymous No.213920671
>>213920588
>what would happen if they were out of cassette tapes of the movie you wanted to borrow?
you ended up watching
> BABY'S DAY OUT
for the third weekend in a row
Anonymous No.213920744 >>213920833 >>213920854 >>213921266 >>213922450
>>213919657 (OP)
it has always blown my mind that a store could be profitable that sells access to DVDs for like what was it? 5€ per day? less?
I still don't understand it, how can that be profitable? They dont even have that many DVDs, do you realize how many ppl have to rent a DVD *per day* just to make rent ? and then how many more to pay a single employee?? That's like... thousands. Do you see thousands of DVDs in that store? Plus people dont rent every DVD equally, they all want the latest movies. The store isn't going to have 500 DVDs of the latest movie, they barely had 5.

I DONT GET IT. As a kid I always assumed that life must be so easy when people and businesses can survive with ridiculous ideas like this.
Anonymous No.213920833
>>213920744
Anon, I recently cancelled the tv part of my tv/internet bundle and the telecom company has had three or four different employees call me to see if they can sell me some sort of new bundle. They can’t but the point is there’s no way to justify having thousands of people on staff trying to hawk contracts when it can all just be done online. Don’t worry about it
Anonymous No.213920854 >>213921160 >>213921865 >>213924298
>>213920744
>then how many more to pay a single employee?? That's like... thousands.
inflation, anon
$5 could buy a steak dinner back then
Anonymous No.213921160 >>213921238 >>213921333 >>213922769
>>213920854
No I thought about it now and calculated it out.

Lets say rent per month is 3000€, that seems somewhat low but it's definitely possible.

3000 / 5€ = 600. So you need 600 monthly customers to make rent. That's 600/30days = 20 per day. That seems doable after all. Of course you need at least one employee and one owner getting paid, so lets say we tripple that and the store has to make 9000 a month to make sense for a business owner. That's still only 60 customers per day, that's not so impossible and the appeal is that this has very low risk, no perishables, no large store rooms required and you even get your product back again after a customer used it. I can see why people would want to start a business like this. You might as well be dumbfounded how videogame developers can stay afloat when they work for years and ultimately sell 60€ to a few thousand people. But for that business I also realized: damn, you dont even need that many people to make it. A mere 5000 purchases of a 60€ game would get you 300k. 5000. Of a GLOBAL audience. Obviously you can assume that you pay like 50% tax in the end but so what, double it to 10k purchases then to actually make 300k. Can you really not make a game that interests 10000 of 8 billion people? I feel like I should be able to do that
Anonymous No.213921234 >>213923113
>>213919657 (OP)

"Video stores are seedy?" Wtf? They were just VHS/DVD rental stores and there was nothing seedy about them. The ones on the island I live on that weren't Blockbuster carried both mainstream movies, American B-movies or genre movies and foreign films like Hong Kong action or Japanese horror films.

I've heard the vice president of the writing club I joined back in college call bars and nightclubs "shady and seedy." He probably says that about them because he probably frequents those types of places on the weekends after a week of college classes. But I don't think "seedy" is a good description of Video rental stores.

Oh and those video rental stores also carried some good video games. I remember renting Robocop vs. Terminator and Mega Man X3, both for the SNES. And I rented Final Fantasy X-2, the Prince of Persia Games and the Soul Calibur games for Playstation 2.
Anonymous No.213921238
>>213921160
>Blockbuster didn’t pay anything for the movies
Anonymous No.213921266 >>213921989 >>213923105
>>213920744
VHS tapes weren't cheap.
TV didn't usually show anything that was more recent than like 10 years old.
There was a gap to fill.
Anonymous No.213921299 >>213921368 >>213921781 >>213922041
>>213919914
If you didn't buy your movies from Fry's electronics than you never really got to enjoy the 2000s.
Anonymous No.213921333
>>213921160
Most video stores I've been to also sold candy and soda as a side hustle. I wouldn't be surprised if that made up a decent chunk of their profits because you'd often see families buy a whole lot at once with the VHS tape or 2 they were renting.
Anonymous No.213921352
>>213919657 (OP)
Blockbuster fucking SUCKED.
Their range of films/games was atrocious, their prices were astronomical, and every single blockbuster on the planet is identical.

Every other franchise rental store was superior, and the little independent "mom and pop" stores were even better.
Anonymous No.213921368 >>213921492 >>213921645
>>213921299
Why is it in quotes?
Anonymous No.213921492
>>213921368
Boomer convention for emphasis from a time period where it was rare to have something that could type in italics.
Anonymous No.213921645
>>213921368
Because you could bribe most employees into not checking ID if you just slipped them a mana potions or two at the checkout line.
Anonymous No.213921720
>>213919657 (OP)
I grew up with both
Buster had a bigger selection
Anonymous No.213921781
>>213921299
Fry's was the best. I remember when the one near me was closing down they had a big clearance sale. Got a new laptop and ipod for like 60% off.
Anonymous No.213921865
>>213920854
>$5 could buy a steak dinner back then
ok but what was the min wage?
Anonymous No.213921920 >>213921989
>>213919657 (OP)
Blockbuster just stocked “unrated” versions of the films that were originally rated NC-17, and those versions were practically the same as the NC-17 cuts.
As far as “weird stuff” gies, blockbuster did have “weird stuff” in the “foreign” and “artistic” sections, snd they had plenty of interesting titles in the action and “suspense/thriller” sections.
There were B-movies full of sex and nudity, and the same with foreign films, and plenty of gory action and horror films.
At one point, the only local video store I could easily find that had “The Cement Garden” was actually a Blockbuster Video.
I’m sure dome titles were banned, and they didn’t specifically carry porn, but otherwise, Blockbuster was decent gor B movies.
The main issues were late fees, the cost of rentals, and the fact that new releases sometimes stayed in the new release section for a year after video release.
Anonymous No.213921989
I have fond memories of Blockbuster, but that's accurate. The smaller rental stores had more personality. Also, even with Blockbuster, how it existed in the 90s was much nicer than what it became in the 00's.
>>213921266
Also, a lot of movies were released for rent but not to buy.
>>213921920
Selection depended on the store, although that probably changed somewhat in the 00's.
Anonymous No.213922024
>>213920588
>i wasn’t even live during this era, what would happen if they were out of cassette tapes of the movie you wanted to borrow?
You had to find something else.
Blockbuster didn’t even have a waitlist.
“New Releases” even if the store had dozens of copies, would stay as “new releases” till the frequency of renting went down to a certain level, so films could stay in the “New Release” section for months or even a year. (Schwarzenegger films, James Cameron films, stiff with Sandra Bullock, etc. )
Anonymous No.213922041 >>213922395 >>213923854
>>213919914
Tfw was too scared to enter one of those as a kid, what was in there?
Obviously porn I'm guessing, but was there also really hentai? >>213921299
Anonymous No.213922042
>>213919700
I'm not saying that video stores were bette rbut I am saying that the psychology of video stores was different:
>Go to a store.
>Set amount of titles.
>Set amount of time to get something.
>Rent a movie.
>The movie is bad? Finish it and get your moneys worth.
>The movie is good? Watch it a few times over the weekend before returning it.
>Expectations were lower, you were surprised more often and entertainment felt better.

Compare with streaming:
>Go to streaming app.
>Homepage is a mess and there are too many titles.
>Choice paralysis because there is so much stuff.
>But contradictorily it feels like there is no choice because all the stuff is the same.
>Start watching something that has been overhyped and plastered on the front page.
>The show is bad? Start instantly doomscrolling looking for something else.
>Show is good? Oh wait it got cancelled.
>Expectations are higher, you are never surprised, entertainment feels like a chore.
>Not even mentioning how stuff is designed for second screen viewing and all the other idiosyncrasies of it.

How content is delievered dpes impact your enjoyment of it to a degree.
Anonymous No.213922302
>>213920501
My parents didn't rent games because they loved me and also weren't retarded and knew games would keep me entertained for longer than a couple days
Anonymous No.213922395
>>213922041
Yeah. And it was right in the open. RIP Fry's.
>Based in Sunnyvale, the company has 32 retail outlets. In thestore off San Marcos Boulevard, the adult video section is on thesame aisle as the drama section of DVDs. It’s one aisle over from the music CDs.
>Covering the movies is a long black divider, marked in whitebold letters: “Adult Content, not sold to anyone under 18.”
>San Marcos resident and preschool teacher Maribel Delgado saidshe recently stumbled upon the porn section while looking for the Stephen King thriller, “Misery.”
>“I couldn’t find it in the drama section, and then I saw’Adult,’ ” she said. “It took me a minute to realize as I waswalking down the aisle that the whole aisle was adult pornography.If you go to a movie store, it’s in a separate room. But at Fry’s,it’s right out there in the open.”
>She said she was shocked because Fry’s appears to cater to youngpeople with their game products and playful decorum.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2006/08/05/residents-want-frys-to-segregate-porn/
Anonymous No.213922450
>>213920744
Blockbuster video usually had at least a couple dozen or more copies of major release films that had made a crapload at the box office.
They would also get copies of direct to video and direct to cable films that people might also want to watch because they liked Dolph Lundgren, or Eric Roberts.
Those B-Movies likely cost way less for Blockbuster to buy, and there may have even been “bundle deals” from those B-Movie distributors were Blockbuster got a good deal for buying copies of dozens of the films released.
Most people who couldn’t get the recent release would then rent something else, which could be another recent release, or a classic film, etc.
As far as employees went, most of the time there only seemed to be one or two employees working the Blockbuster, unless it was Friday or the Weekend.
I literally used to rent from an Indy video store that usually had way more employees on hand at any time.
The initial video release tapes usually cost the stores a lot for popular films, but once the tape had been rented twenty or thirty times, the cost was paid for and the video store was in profit, and practically every transaction for the tape afterward was pure profit.
(I’m not sure actual video cost, but $80-$100 was usually charged to a customer who lost a tape, so this or less was what the video store was likely paying, and half would be a better estimate).
The New releases cost mire to rent, but were popular enough that they might remain “new releases” for six months to a year, and barely ever be available.
That means two rentals, per week, (at least), or 8 rentals per month, so after two months, the tape was probably in profit mode.
Unlike a business like Starbucks, which charges about the same for coffee drinks as Blockbuster charged for a video rental, Blockbuster only had to pay for the tapes once, and then there were no other costs than having an employee check tapes in and out in a computer.
Anonymous No.213922769
>>213921160
its hilarious seeing zoomers try to calculate business math. you forgot power + water and liability insurance
Anonymous No.213923010
>>213920002
8MM
great flick
Anonymous No.213923105 >>213923260
>>213921266
>VHS tapes weren't cheap.
>TV didn't usually show anything that was more recent than like 10 years old.
>There was a gap to fill.
This.
The usual progression, was;
Film gets released into theaters, but usually not all at once across the country.
Sometimes a movie could stay in theatrical release for years, with copies of the film traveling around from one region to another.
Foreign films and art films were notorious for this.
Finally, sometimes after several or more years, a video release would be announced.
The film would then get released on video, for sale, sometimes at $100 or more, again, art films were usually way more expensive than popular films.
Then, finally, the films might be available as Rentals, usually with limited numbers of copies at the video rental store, do you still might have to wait months to rent the film.
Eventually, some premium cable channel might buy airing rights for the film, with those rights bring held buy the premium cable channel for a decade or two. I think HBO might have been $20 a month extra on the cable bill.
Then, that premium cable channel might allow a non-premium cable channel to show the film, maybe one owned by the premium network.
Eventually, after maybe teo decades, there might be a “special event” were that blockbuster film got shown on regular broadcast TV.
One of the non-premium cable channels used yo air Lynch’s Dune, or the Dune extended version, as a “special event” once or twice year, for over a decade or more, with the film shown multiple times in a row per day.
Eventually, releases to video from theatrical release got quicker, maybe within a year or so, I think that happened in the 1990s, and films also showed up on cable quicker.
Anonymous No.213923113
>>213921234
Seedy means they'd let kids rent Faces of Death or smoke out front, or put a porno in an inconspicuous case for dad to watch after everyone went to bed.
Anonymous No.213923162
>>213919700
This. Some people are simply to o dumb to enjoy freedom and easy of access.
They get lost in overabundance of choice.
Very sad.
Anonymous No.213923260 >>213924092
>>213923105
I also remember a racket in the late 80s/early 90s where companies would sell you six VHS releases for a penny with some sort of brutal conditions that you had to eventually buy more at a very high price. Fortunately my mom was/is a deadbeat and just flaked on them somehow. I remember she got Ghost and I got Robocop and maybe Turner and Hooch. That last one was a mistake.
Anonymous No.213923348 >>213923373
translation: people use the word blockbuster as a common reference to video rental stores and i don't like it reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Anonymous No.213923373
>>213923348
Bandaid is a trademarked name for a specific brand of adhesive bandages. Deal with it
Anonymous No.213923768
>>213919700
Anonymous No.213923854 >>213924130
>>213922041
I heard they had all the Red Shoe Diaries and the Japanese Sailor Moon where the scouts are fully naked
Anonymous No.213924092 >>213924260
>>213923260
>I also remember a racket in the late 80s/early 90s where companies would sell you six VHS releases for a penny with some sort of brutal conditions that you had to eventually buy more at a very high price. Fortunately my mom was/is a deadbeat and just flaked on them somehow. I remember she got Ghost and I got Robocop and maybe Turner and Hooch. That last one was a mistake.
That would be BMG or Columbia House DVD or movie memberships.
Generally, you chose a certain number of films from a list of a few hundred films, and pain shipping and handling on each film, and a nominal amount, and then you had to buy one film at “regular” retail price. The club would also send you a card listing a movie release of the month, and you had to send the card back to decline, or they would mail you the film and charge you the “regular retail” price, plus shipping.
There were similar clubs from the same companies fir CDs, and Cassettes, and Books, etc.
BMG is a huge media conglomerate, and large enough to probably be considered a defacto monopoly.
Some guy in some sort of credit job once told me that defaulting on one of those clubs only remained on your financial records for a year, because “everybody defaults”.
The clubs were a good way to build a collection if they had the films you wanted.
One of the major clubs actually got sued in a class action lawsuit based on charging “Supra competitive” prices for its “regular retail prices” and had to pay each customer a few bucks or give the customers a free movie.
Anonymous No.213924130
>>213923854
You could literally rent “Red Shoe Diaries” from Blockbuster.
I know, because I did.
Anonymous No.213924260
>>213924092
Yeah that sounds about right. Columbia House was the one I think. All I know is watched Robocop enough to wear the tape out. That and Turner and Hooch fucking sucks
Anonymous No.213924298
>>213920854
You need to hold the knife so you get the most reach
the key to winning is "don't get hit"
Anonymous No.213924499
BBV didn’t own the movies you retards. The studios did. The store just rented them out before you could buy. They would have a hundred copies of titanic for a month then sell extras pre used.
They fucked up thinking the had a better model than Netflix.