← Home ← Back to /tv/

Thread 213925248

72 posts 36 images /tv/
Anonymous No.213925248 >>213925287 >>213925325 >>213925353 >>213925631 >>213926036 >>213926357 >>213927579 >>213927634 >>213928548 >>213928678 >>213929010 >>213929175 >>213929191 >>213929281
SUPERMAN
im not really looking to get in the weeds of the movies, which one was cinematically better
but clearly corenswet looks more like superman then cavil
Anonymous No.213925287 >>213929736
>>213925248 (OP)
Range ban india
Anonymous No.213925325 >>213925407 >>213925409 >>213925454 >>213927544 >>213929095
>>213925248 (OP)
I never understood the "look more like" argument about Superman. There have been thousands of Superman stories that have drawn him hundreds of different ways. The both look like Superman to me.
Anonymous No.213925353 >>213927643 >>213929191
>>213925248 (OP)
i mean even off screen corenswet looks like the brave big dicked superhero we need but dont deserve
hes a big sexy dork on and off screen, basically everything a man should be

cavil looks tired and in text isn't even super, did my superman die at the end of the movie, no
did yours? yes (superpussy+L+ratio+dont care)
Anonymous No.213925407 >>213925464
>>213925325
I think just fact Cavill looks like a scowling asshole with a shit eaters grin which most people donโ€™t associate with Superman. Outside comic nerds, most people associate pic related as Superman
Anonymous No.213925409
>>213925325
i think somefolk like cavil better because they want a jesusy superman
but it never works when they try to deify him (make him more godly)
Anonymous No.213925454
>>213925325
Its code for the more Superman looks like a loser the more I can relate to him- Superman fans are braindead manchildren
Anonymous No.213925464
>>213925407
i'd say he's a closer pic, a superman without a smile is just a lame version of batman and lame batman is ben afleck

peak batman was christian bale
Anonymous No.213925631
>>213925248 (OP)
clearly one meant more and had a wider audience, OP
but i think its a waste of time getting in the weeds of who looks more like superman
Anonymous No.213925688 >>213925870
>capeslop
grow up
Anonymous No.213925870
>>213925688
i thought /tv/ loved capeslop
bane posting was my shit back in the day
Anonymous No.213926036 >>213926236
>>213925248 (OP)
>but clearly corenswet looks more like superman then cavil
Maybe if you think Superman is supposed to be ugly.
Anonymous No.213926236
>>213926036
Look, another brown Cavill faggot
Anonymous No.213926357
>>213925248 (OP)
Cavill is a very attractive man, maybe one of the most handsome in the world right now. He has a very imperialistic, lordly sort of handsomeness that would suit Bruce Wayne better.
Corenswet looks like he might have grown up on a farm in the midwest. Broad shoulders, clean cut, obliviously handsome. I think he is a more natural Superman casting.
Anonymous No.213926719
Mommy
Anonymous No.213926739
Daddy
Anonymous No.213926768
Jr.
Anonymous No.213927544 >>213927799 >>213928982
>>213925325
>No trunks
>S on his chest doesn't stand for Superman
>Pa Kent wants him to hide his powers
>No krypto dog
>Daily Planet is just a generic CNN style building
>Fortress of Solitude is just a hunk of ice
>Superman is a scowling and brooding guy who doesn't fight for truth, justice, and the American way
I love Man of Steel but it's obviously Snyder creating his own story out of an existing property. It's the absolute least "Superman-y" piece of Superman media ever
Anonymous No.213927579
>>213925248 (OP)
The symbol on his chest doesn't even look like S anymore
Anonymous No.213927634
>>213925248 (OP)
I mean, duh.
Anonymous No.213927643 >>213931571
>>213925353
^ Who types likes this? This has to be some marketeering shill.
Anonymous No.213927799 >>213927838
>>213927544
This same kind of shit is why I was never big on Nolanโ€™s Batman movies or The Batman. This deconstruction of a comic book character and removing as much comic book elements out of it so it can appeal to man children who can pretend shit made for kids is adult and sophisticated
Anonymous No.213927838 >>213928031
>>213927799
NTA. I agree with you.
But I will argue for the rest of my life that The Batman was actually a deconstruction of modern grimdark slop.
Anonymous No.213928004 >>213928053
This may come across as shocking to some, but I don't really give a fuck who was the better super duper pooper man. In fact, I don't really give a fuck about comic book hero movies at all, really.
Anonymous No.213928031 >>213928097 >>213928314
>>213927838
Youโ€™re probably right about The Batman. What I like about Gunn is he is fully aware comic books are ridiculous and so is Superman and leans right into it. No director would have the balls to ever have Krypto in a Superman movie. Why heโ€™s never been in a Superman movie
Anonymous No.213928053 >>213928125 >>213928178
>>213928004
But why are you telling us
Anonymous No.213928097 >>213928198 >>213928314
>>213928031
I just like when superhero movies are made for kids. They're the most recognizably accurate in that kind of atmosphere.
There's a huge difference between Peacemaker and Superman.
Peacemaker is unwatchable, but Superman is a silly romp you'd find in the Silver Age.
Anonymous No.213928125 >>213928149
>>213928053
Because I'm trans and have to force everyone to hear my opinions.
Anonymous No.213928149
>>213928125
Oh, okay
Anonymous No.213928178 >>213928255
>>213928053
>But why are you telling us
Because once every few days, I drop into one of the dozens of these brainless heroslop spam threads to let you know
Anonymous No.213928198
>>213928097
Capeshit got a major problem and Stan Lee said this shortly before he died. Catering so much to man children kids today do not care about comics or capeshit. More into Manga. Fall of capeshit will be because of this. Going to see a lot more Jap shit soon
Anonymous No.213928255
>>213928178
Did I mention I'm trans?
Anonymous No.213928314 >>213928498 >>213928565
>>213928031
>>213928097
superman comics may be ridiculous by nature but that doesn't mean it makes for a good film
there are some things that ought to stay on the pages
Anonymous No.213928498 >>213928683
>>213928314
That why Donner Superman movies which are ridiculous havenโ€™t been topped? That Raimi borrowed the formula for his Spider Man movies which are considered the best ones.
Anonymous No.213928548 >>213928583 >>213928647
>>213925248 (OP)
>but clearly corenswet looks more like superman then cavil
Anonymous No.213928565 >>213928683 >>213928840
>>213928314
The best comic book movies are ridiculous.
>Dick Tracy
>Spider-Man
>The Phantom
>The Shadow
>Superman
>The Batman
>Batman 66
>Batman 89
>The Rocketeer
I could go on and on. They're all highly stylized, melodramatic, theatrical, and not afraid to be comedically self-aware.
Anonymous No.213928583
>>213928548
Anonymous No.213928589 >>213928641 >>213929050
No doubt in my mind had Superman โ€˜25 came out instead of Superman Returns, Superman would not be damaged mishandled brand it become, and would be close to Spider Man level
Anonymous No.213928641
>>213928589
Returns was the egg, not the chicken. Superman is BORING and you are biased for thinking otherwise.
Anonymous No.213928647
>>213928548
Look at that AI hand.
Anonymous No.213928678
>>213925248 (OP)
You could at least try a little with the bait
Anonymous No.213928683 >>213928801
>>213928498
donner's films are campy, not ridiculous, he doesn't use dumb shit like a super dog or make lex luthor a flaming faggot, and on top of that he also remembered to make the villains actually dangerous and the stakes serious. nobody cares about some shitskin being shot in another dimension and the entire time the city is being ripped in half floating science negro is already working on fixing it up. same applies for spider-man.

>>213928565
those films are campy, not ridiculous.

campy is when the spirit of the film is clearly tongue-in-cheek and that allows a balance of serious and goofy fun. ridiculous/cringe is when you take some dumb shit and try to plaster it all over and act like it's actually good. nobody wrote the kryptonian zoo with the thought that it would one day be put into a film because they knew it was idiotic from the get-go.
Anonymous No.213928801 >>213928849 >>213928883
>>213928683
Campy is ridiculous.
It's tongue and cheek. Just like a cosmic anvil or intergalactic zoo.
Just like a flying man in his underpants.
Anonymous No.213928840 >>213928945
>>213928565
There is a big difference between those movies, and the new Superman. Big, Biiig difference.
Anonymous No.213928849 >>213928930 >>213928945
>>213928801
campy is ridiculous TO AN EXTENT, it isn't the entire fucking movie.

you love donner superman because while christopher reeve is a handsome smiling jackass he still saves the day and the girl and you can't help but cheer him on. at no point in gunnman are you ever cheering on superman because he just mopes and groans the whole fucking film while everyone else does all the legwork.
Anonymous No.213928883 >>213929021
>>213928801
I like seen where Clark jumps out a window and his Superman suit just magically appears on him. If Gunn did that, you can only imagine the faggot out rage. Or Luthor being produced to a comedic character with idiot sidekicks
Anonymous No.213928930 >>213929056 >>213929084
>>213928849
Just say youโ€™re a Snyder faggot and hate movie regardless. You people are biggest bitches on the internet
Anonymous No.213928944
>when in doubt, blame Snyder
Anonymous No.213928945 >>213929045 >>213929056
>>213928840
Not really. Some are better, but they're all children's entertainment. Maybe teen entertainment for a few of those movies.
>>213928849
Superman: The Movie is ridiculous at every second. There is not one moment of that movie that isn't ridiculous.
Even the heartfelt moments involve an alien man who crashed landed in Kansas.
I had no trouble cheering both Supermen on. I realized long ago that men in their underpants are silly, and that you can't make silly too silly.
Anonymous No.213928982
>>213927544
It was a different age. It was the age of the "gritty" and "realistic" action movie. Man Of Steel came out 1 year after the Nolan Batman trilogy came out.

Nowadays, the trend is colorful and fantastical movies. Compare Phase 1 MCU to any MCU movie in the last few years. Or Bay Transformers to Transformers One
Anonymous No.213929010
>>213925248 (OP)
What if I told you they were both different shades of the seem homosexual capeslop faggotry that has been diverting creative budgets from good movies for the last two decades?
Anonymous No.213929021
>>213928883
Imagine modern crybabies watching Tessmacher rescue Superman from drowning in a pool.
Then kissing him of all things.
Modern fans wouldn't like that one bit.
Anonymous No.213929045 >>213929150
>>213928945
The difference is that i can watch The Shadow or Spider-Man without feeling the movie is insulting my intelligence. Those movies are somewhat campy and whimsical, but they're also grounded when needed and have gravitas.

The new Superman movie is more akin to Sharkboy and Lavagirl.
Anonymous No.213929050 >>213930245
>>213928589
Superman will never be spider man level because heโ€™s just not a well written character, he survives off branding and his run during the 40s but the more theyโ€™ve added to him the more people have distanced themselves from the character- this film made 600 in the box office thatโ€™s just not good for Superman, Iโ€™m sorry- it isnโ€™t.
Anonymous No.213929056 >>213929150
>>213928930
nobody mentioned snyder except you
for the record i think gunn is a fine director, it's just his writing that needs improvement, or at least a second set of eyes to curb his autism, his comedy style worked fine for marvel but for dc it's awful
>>213928945
>Superman: The Movie is ridiculous at every second. There is not one moment of that movie that isn't ridiculous.
you didn't watch the movie
Anonymous No.213929084
>>213928930
I mean if you like glazing a movie where Superman is the beta jobber and gets the shit beaten out of him, and never does a single cool thing in the movie, go ahead and glaze on... Away from this thread. Fuck DC, fuck WB, and fuck "the brand". Let it stay dead and buried.
Anonymous No.213929095
>>213925325
I agree. Cavil's suit was too genericically scifi bodysuit on it's own merits for me though.
Anonymous No.213929150 >>213929214
>>213929045
I'm confused by what you mean by grounded?
They give time to dramatics, and develop the characters outside of incessant spectacle, but what was grounded about Spider-Man 2002 that Superman 2025 is lacking?
>>213929056
>you didn't watch the movie
My friend, you are as sharp as a marble.
Anonymous No.213929175
>>213925248 (OP)
Man of Steel won
Anonymous No.213929191
>>213925248 (OP)
>>213925353
I can't get over how balding Cavill's hairline is, Corenswet utterly mogs him there
Anonymous No.213929214 >>213929311
>>213929150
>but what was grounded about Spider-Man 2002 that Superman 2025 is lacking?
The movie sold me on that it took place in New York and that this teenager became a mutant hero. Things were fantastical but the world itself, the characters, and the events were believable enough. There were moments of levity and some whimsical scenes? Yes, but overall things were very believable in that action-adventure style.

Superman, though, was bullshit all the way through. Felt like a parody movie in some places.
Anonymous No.213929281 >>213929299 >>213929431 >>213929604
>>213925248 (OP)
i can't wait to see supergirl gangbanged by lobo and other aliens. Gunn's universe is based as fuck
Anonymous No.213929299
>>213929281
really?
Anonymous No.213929311 >>213929436
>>213929214
It didn't sell you that it existed in a Metropolitan city and that a man with flying powers existed in that city?
What kind of plot would fit the man with the flying powers who flies around in his underwear?
Nothing having to do with cloning apparently, or space, or other flying beings. No monsters as well, and maybe not even evil geniuses depending on how comical their plans are?
What would you have gone with?
Anonymous No.213929431
>>213929281
>EEEEEEEE
Anonymous No.213929436 >>213929621 >>213930061
>>213929311
The first Superman made me believe an alien came to Earth, grew up as a normal man, and then tried to become some type of guardian angel.

This movie just throws things at you at a fast pace, without giving any concept or really any scene some breathing room, before moving to the next thing, and most of it doesn't really follow any logical sense. Things just happen, and happen, and happen. Characters feel like caricature and not like normal people. They just are there either for a joke or to scream their character sheet. The shitty visual effects or really how things play out during moments of action just feels purposely dumb and poorly made.

Like i said, it feels like something akin to Sharkboy and Lavagirl.
Anonymous No.213929604
>>213929281
why are the films being rated PG-13 but then the streaming shows get R ratings? i want to see milly alcock getting fucked in the supergirl outfit.
Anonymous No.213929621
>>213929436
If you don't really care to discuss it further, then let me know, but can you give examples?
Superheroes are usually pretty archetypal anyways.
Superman is the heroic boy-next-door, Lois is the feisty damsel, Lex is the envious mastermind, etc.
I think the VFX are rough, so I agree there. But in terms of the plot not flowing logically I don't follow.
Anonmous No.213929736
>>213925287
Seconded. Take the matter up for vote.
Anonymous No.213930061
>>213929436
A lot of action and fast paced for a character who headlines Action Comics?
Anonymous No.213930245
>>213929050
Superman is the original Iron Man that DC Universe is built around. JLA was made for a team to revolve around Superman. Why team ups work for Superman and where I think he couldโ€™ve found success. Snyder forced Batman into the Superman/Iron Man position by killing off Superman and it didnโ€™t work
Anonymous No.213931571
>>213927643
im gonna be honest i just wanted to write slop