ok i have avoided this since it came out since i didnt care and im employed but now im genuinely curious. what is so controversial about this and what makes it white supremacist or whatever? its just a girl in jeans. what the fuck is the thing with this ad?
>>213992708
ok but seriously what is the actual reason? does she say something in the ad thats inflammatory or is there some statement? >>213992717
ok but white people have appeared in ads 50 trillion times before and after this ad so why this one in particular?
>>213992616 (OP)
I don't blame libs desu
I would be seething too if I found out the most famous rising Hollywood star of our time is registered republican xDDD
>>213992616 (OP)
I like how the woke leftists answer to such an affront to their religion that a white person can have good genes (according to their religion white is evil) is to post several non-white women all of whom are obviously bogged. So... non-whites don't have good genes? Is that the message?
>>213992616 (OP) >friendly reminder that these are simply troll/ragebait threads created by /pol/ coomers who will call you gay and an incel and who will bump their own fap thread with weird terms about Sydney Sweeney's whomb etv
>>213993882
I fucking hate post 2000s Nickelodeon. I donβt care I grew up with it, itβs went downhill so quickly and only the indoctrinated like anything Drake and Josh adjacent.
>>213992678
fake outrage to get you talking about the advertisement itself
the jew owned shitty jean company hires models of all races, liberals just never bothered looking at the website