>>214030324
>tells non creatives they aren't human
>non creative responds: jobs jobs werk werk, I work therefore I am
NTA, but I don't think he was talking about "creative" jobs, which is a bit of an oxymoron in itself.
>>214030016
What initially filled up the internet with slop was corporations moving to the internet and spamming their soulless images and video. Think stock images. This whole AI thing is just a continuation of the problem. Except non creatives have been trained on internet stock slop for years now, so they're even more inclined to generate slop via AI. "Meme culture" hasn't exactly helped either.
>>214026472 (OP)
"I might be able to. There are no absolutes in art, but the closest you could come to understand that would be through some statistical variable."