Thread 214041953

What can Disney do to win back their male audience?

Give me 2 million dollars to make a better movie for them, and then when it outperforms anything they’ve made in decades, give me an unlimited budget to make more.

>>214041953 (OP)
Stop acting like a bunch of faggots.

>>214042036
You wouldn't be able to perform.

>>214042066
impossible challenge

Send Daisy Ridley on a house-to-house goodwill tour

>>214041953 (OP)
They need to fire all of the gay people in decision making positions.

>>214042111
*Bzzzzzzt*
Incorrect answer.

>male audience
This niggas gay

>>214042172
Disney's words, not mine.

tits
ass
toxic masculinity

>>214042238
A simple, straightforward answer, but I don't think it's the right one.

attractive animal women

>>214041953 (OP)
Disney wants the male audience back like they wanted Thor and Luke Skywalker back.

They're not planning to send a limousine filled with top shelf wine and super models, roll out the red carpet, and give us the best male-targeted entertainment we've ever seen for the foreseeable future. They want to do the absolute bare minimum that they can get away with to get men back into their ecosystem so that we can continue funding them and they can continue putting us through humiliation rituals.

And they also want to destroy the eastern male spaces that men have fled to in order to get away from Hollywood. To be honest, I wouldn't be against putting Hollywood executives through struggle sessions.

There's nothing Disney can do. They poisoned the well and now no one will drink. Maybe they can buy Kpop Demon Hunter and ruin that, just like they ruined Star Wars, Pixar, Marvel, and their own legacy.

>>214045232
If Disney investors replaced Bob Iger with a creative visionary who's a legitimate critic of feminism (not a fake MAGA snake like Jeff Bezos or kosher conservative like Ben Shapiro) and then the new CEO similarly replaced the Kathleen Kennedies and Kevin Feiges, they could have men back on board within 5-10 years.
>movie is good
>guy drags his friends to go see it
>they like it too
>this is a consistent pattern
>redemption process started

The problem is that this is never going to happen.

>>214041953 (OP)
Not deliberately antagonizing them would probably be a good start.

Personally though I'm just not interested in watching reboot after reboot after lazily greenscreened reboot of franchises that are more than 50 years old. Decades ago Disney was mainly known for children's films, and they were known for putting real care into the quality of their films. They made films that appealed to both boys and girls. The storytelling was straightforward and earnest and aligned with universal values.

They seem terrified to make anything that isn't subversive now, they're so terrified of cliche that they avoid everything that appeals to most audiences. No heroes, no romance, no values. I think most families would still rather show their kids a Disney film from 60 years ago than anything they've made in the last decade.

They've lost their creative identity, they've lost their quality control, they've lost their soul, and all they seem to do now is take properties that people love and do their best to bastardize them and hollow them out and run them into the ground until they've wrung every possible penny out of the brand name.

tl;dr - Make good movies again. Try that.

>>214045066
I sympathize completely.

>>214041953 (OP)
Just re-release The Black Cauldron and The Sword in the Stone. No editions, no "fixes". Just undust the old film and play it in the theater.

>>214041953 (OP)
hire a bunch of men to write a movie about a captain nemo-esque character with ship battles and sea monsters, no fags or women allowed

>>214045455
It's not that they're terrified to not make anything that isn't subversive.
It's that they don't WANT to make anything that isn't subversive.

The past ten years has been Hollywood's and their backers' vision for entertainment for decades. The machine aggressively stomped out tabletop, comics, novels, and videogames for being a refuge from this vision, and now they're going after anime for the same reason. If you don't think of Hollywood, BlackRock, the intelligence agencies, the universities, etc. as being arms of the same body with money being bounced across proxies to obscure the connection, you'll never understand why things are happening like they are.

>>214041953 (OP)
lol

>>214041953 (OP)
Nothing. They fucked it.

>>214041953 (OP)
they're going to make some gay movie with a black or brown male character and then say" we did it guys, we catered to men! now lets get back to catering to women"

>>214045605
Its literally all Jews

>>214045605
I'd believe it, it certainly all feels deliberate, but I just don't understand the goal. I understand why outside influences like China or Russia would want to demoralize the American population. I don't understand why America would want to demoralize its own population. We're weaker than ever. We were doing better politically and economically and on the global stage when we weren't being forcefed constant misery and divisiveness. What's the endgame?

>>214041953 (OP)
>What can Disney do to win back their male audience?
Nothing, because whoever suggests an actually viable course of action will immediately get dismissed from the executive meeting and never invited again. If they by some weird magic manage to agree about making a male-oriented adventure, they'll still hire some woman director who'll turn it into some lesbian escapism metaphor with 0 test.

>>214045694
>America would want to demoralize its own population.
if you understand why russia and china would want to do it. you can understand why jews want to do it to the goyim

>>214041953 (OP)
Bring back a Princess of Mars but this time do it with the originally intended outfits.

Don't change anything from the original story. Keep the sexism. Keep the racism. Keep the inappropriate content. Keep the slavery. keep Deja being a bombshell that barely wears anything. Keep the red Martians barely wearing more than body ornamentation. Keep the MC's political alignments. Keep the objectification. Keep the violence. Keep the male protagonist being objectively right, strong, and honorable.

The original story, as intended. No changed.

>>214041953 (OP)
They don't want male audiences to enjoy their movies again. They want the male audiences to consume their propaganda.

>>214045694
If you think of the international banking cartels as a hostile foreign power and America as occupied, you'll understand the dynamic better.

Why did the Assyrians take people from one conquered city and move them into a newly conquered one? Because people who's cultural and communal bonds have been severed will have more trouble organizing and resisting. That's how far back the tactics of the WEF goes.

>>214045748
>Bring back a Princess of Mars but this time do it with the originally intended outfits.
The comic isn't the original

>>214045738
Yeah but where are they gonna go after they've run America and Europe into the ground? You think Israel would survive a year without our backing? It feels as though we've been pushed nearly to the point of total social collapse through internal strife and polarization alone. If the plan was to create a submissive population, they pushed way too far. If America collapses, or more likely just degrades into a much less powerful nation, then China rules the world, and China isn't gonna treat the Jews better than the goyim did

seriously... were you shills getting so much flack for using the same twitter screencap of a fucking variety tabloid e-article that you're now just asking the same exact question but with a random picture? how embarrassing

>>214045824
Kikes only think in terms of next financial quarter

>>214045763
They're trying to find the balance between diluting their media with shit and with what's good. Recently they've been leaning too much into the shit to save costs I'm guessing.

>>214045816
I'm not talking about the covers. I'm talking about the contents of the books. She's described as nearly being naked, wearing little more than body ornaments some trailing semi transparent fabrics. That's just one description she wears many outfits over the course of several stories. She and hte other red martians do not wear normal clothes or even alien clothes. They wear decorative body ornaments at best and find the clothes the earth people wear strange. That cover you posted is just the artist trying not to get the book banned for the cover alone in the timeframe it was made in.

>>214045824
the thing is, jews jew jews just as bad as they jew everyone else. today's jews are fucking their future jew litters over by absolutely running their people's name through the muck - but why should they give a shit? they're here right now and they want child sex, designer drugs, and gaudy forms of transportation and vacation lodging, and if they have to condemn future baby moshe to die in some camp for it, oh well

>>214045832
Understand the implications of the picture
"Get the picture"
One might say...

>>214045428
The sad thing is you're right. I remember how quickly people forgave Ghostbusters 2016 the second Afterlife was announced.

>>214045887
the only implication here is that OP just so happened to want to post this pointless thread that just so happened to have been posted dozens of times over the last week, which have all just so happened to grow tiresome to even the dumbest sheep here to the point people were shitposting and saging them straight to page 10. yeah i get it, ha ha, bane meme, do you feel in charge yidsney, etc. very topical of these kikes. i'm sure the retards here will eat it up

>>214045782
That does make more sense. I think I am being a bit naive, too, if I consider how China and Russia treat their own citizens, and that America in its best times really has been an anomaly in having so much power yet giving its own citizens so much free rein. Historically speaking it'd only make sense that there would be people and groups working to seize more power and control over us, from without or within

It really sucks to watch them gain so much ground in real time

>>214045940
The implication is that Disney thinks they're in charge.

>>214045975
unless you're like 100 years old believe me, you haven't seen anything and you would have never been able to change it. they've been at this shit for so long, systematically dismantling the west, embedding themselves into political roles and businesses and media, greasing hands on a generational scale - you couldn't even comprehend it. some people believe this jew bullshit has been going on since the REVOLUTIONARY WAR. some would even say it goes all the way back to charlamagne and the magna carta.

clearly it goes back further than anybody realizes or else you wouldn't be able to find records of the fucking rothschilds getting their noses into shit since back to the middle ages. to say nothing of the shared hatred of semites from the romans, egyptians, persians, etc

>>214045990
i literally said that, yes. doesn't change the fact this is a shill thread

>>214046058
Do you feel in charge?

>>214041953 (OP)
more interracial couples

>>214046065
i do and i am. i could fuck, kill, and eat literally any given person on this website 1 vs 1. on this particular board? probably 1 vs 10. i'd be like fucking godzilla stomping on all these jeets and chinks and kikes

>>214046043
It's forever been like this. Even in the bible, god keeps getting mad at them.

>>214046100
And this gives you ... power over me?

>>214046100
you would never beat me with prep time, no one on this board can

>>214046120
yes, and your asshole. aggravate me and i will put it on rent

>>214046075
ewe just know

>>214046162
prep time, huh?

>>214046100
That fight would be over in two punches: Me punching you, and you hitting the ground

>>214046170
Your memes and shitposts have been important
... till now

>>214046199
that's one punches

>>214046212
Keep running your mouth, tough guy, and I'll end it in zero punches

Looks like we got a bunch of tough guys ITT.

>>214046235
hands free sucking? you're hired

>>214041953 (OP)
Cloned Walt Disney executing all the idiots leftists that ruined his company.

>>214045824
>You think Israel would survive a year without our backing?
Historically middle eastern empires have been very prosperous due to being the bridge between europe and asia.

>>214046075
sheep bros... not like this...

>>214046269
Oh I'll finish you off, all right, but it won't be a happy ending

Disney has never had a male audience.

>>214046290
And yet
We live in a new world order

>>214046311
They really haven't.

>>214046311
Children and their fathers, once. Now they're aiming more for fat manchildren

>>214046333
No, they have fat manchildren.
Those are the only "men" left sticking around for their "male market" output.
They are attempting to reach the healthier fighting-age men who terrify them.

>>214041953 (OP)
cartoons

>>214041953 (OP)

They know what they have to do, this isn't secret knowledge, they're just not willing to do it.

The question they're actually asking is, what is the bare minimum we have to do, and change as little possible, in order to get away with no consequences, in getting those box office numbers up.

>>214041953 (OP)
Bring back racism.

PERIOD.

They killed Narnia
They killed John Carter
They killed Tron
They killed Star Wars

Might as well continue with whatever they're doing. They will NEVER win me back.

>>214041953 (OP)
>win back
this is the first i'm ever hearing of disney being interested in the male demographic

>>214042085
That's what your mom said to me last night!

>>214049049
There is actually something they've missed that might as well be a secret.
You can tell them to make movies with manly white christian males and submissive white big titty females going on a toxic male power fantasy adventure...
But that's not the real trick.

>>214051768

You're not wrong, people will think that's exploitative and pandering, they'll lose whatever support they garnered from the frothing beasts on the progressive side and not win over the people they're trying to win back doing that.

One of the key problems is that the people in charge are despised. It doesn't matter what they make if they're the ones that are making them. What my guess is the people they've lost wants to see is these companies do a clean up of the corporations and remove the people who did the damage in the first place, top to bottom, with a commitment to doing things properly from now on. I think with that level of public transformation, you'll see those people come back, but it will absolutely be anathema for them because they will have lost the progressive side entirely. They're stuck in a no win situation, so they have to pick the side they think will give them the most money and just stick with it, and downsize if they think they're not going to profit as much going forward.

>>214050847
You visited my mother!
Did she cut off your balls too?

>>214045748
Deal anon. Provided of course we can make Thoris black and gay.

>>214041953 (OP)
Even if they somehow dekike the whole company it might be too late.

>>214041953 (OP)
Giving them blowjobs for free.

>>214051893
Disney *will* have to make compromises in their approach.
They're not going to win the attention of "young men" without compromises.
But I don't think they need a restructuring of their company or anything like that.
All they need is a very slight, simple change in philosophy and approach.

Nothing. And it's impossible for many different reasons.
Young males don't really care about movies, they have twitter, tiktok, youtube, twitch, whatever.
Outside of Marvel they never really had a male audience. Their target were children and women and they still watch their movies. Lilo & Stitch, another shitty remake made above $1 billion.
Streaming will replaced theaters in the near future.

>>214042111
Demonstrably false, since a gay man made some of their best films
The same can not be said of Disney’s female leadership!

>>214052190
They could appeal to male audiences and get them back in the theaters in droves just by making really good movies.
As the world has changed and become much more complex, the standard of what will qualify as a "good movie" to audiences has risen dramatically, while technical skill and talent within the company has plummeted.
Very slim odds.
But it's still possible.

>>214052304
QRD?

>>214052353
I don't believe young people have good taste in cinema. Especially zoomers and alpha. For two decades Hollywood taught people to watch only capeshit and similar crap.

>>214052405
Oh sure, I agree ... basically.
But the definition of "good" also depends on the person using using the word, the context, and so on.
It's still possible to bring back young men to the theater in droves.

>>214052375
Howard Ashman - wrote for most of the Renaissance films music and was the driving force behind Aladdin’s production
Tragically, as a lover of theater, AIDS

>>214041953 (OP)
The Disney that had me no longer exists. The skinwalker calling itself Disney now can't win me back because it never had me to begin with.

>>214052984
>The skinwalker calling itself Disney
Gosh it really does feel like that.