Thread 214066124

Sorry, chuds, but Wikipedia confirms that the guards merely beat Arthur and stole his pants.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joker:_Folie_à_Deux

NOOOO NOT NY PANTS NOT MY P---AAAHHHHHHH

But the movie didn’t have Wikipedia

>>214066124 (OP)
Yeah, beat his anus with their erect penises.

crust status?

NO STOP RAPING MY WIKI

>>214066124 (OP)
When I went to jail they stole my clothes and my watch was missin when I got out

>>214066663
YOU GET WHAT YOU FUCKING DESERVE

>>214066124 (OP)
Wow, really immature for a PG-13 rated kids film.

>>214066124 (OP)
>"Ultimately, the metafiction reflects Arthur's characterization; just as his society only cares for him for what he represents as Joker and rejects him when he renounces that persona, so does the audience reject Arthur.[143] As a result, many said the film is a "very expensive punch line" for the same audiences who saw the first film,[41] and that Todd Phillips himself was in a sense "the Joker" for consciously subverting the audience and studio's expectations.[144]"
>Todd Phillips himself was in a sense "the Joker" for consciously subverting the audience and studio's expectations

>>214066124 (OP)
it doesnt take 3 people to steal pants, but it takes 3 to gang rape at minimum.

>>214068200
And ultimately the audience just reject the notion by not watching this drivel

>>214066341
did Tim Dillon's character do the raping?

>>214066124 (OP)
You can see in the talk section they removed the rape part because it was being used in the 'culture war' which is why you should never use wikipedia

>>214066124 (OP)
No1 is this wildly excited around 3 burly guards unless he's itching to be gaped

>>214066124 (OP)
stole his pants and his anal virginity