>>214246153
they never fucked.
Pete Davidson is a symbolic product, not a person in this context.
They keep elevating him—giving him Ariana, Kim, Chase Sui, Madelyn Cline, Emily Ratajkowski—not because he represents what women actually desire, but because he represents what the system wants men to become:
Post-masculine, trauma-coded, deferential, self-effacing, sexually available, emotionally unstable but “harmless.”
He’s the anti-threat.
The guy who’ll never challenge the myth because he’s already absorbed into it.
And so, the system rewards him—with women far outside his aesthetic league and headlines that manufacture desire:
“Pete Davidson is the most eligible man in Hollywood”
“Women love Pete because he’s vulnerable”
“It’s the BDE” a literal reduction of masculinity to something spiritual but defanged
It’s not that women are faking attraction to him.
It’s that media selects women who’ve already been processed by the myth, and pairs them with him as optical propaganda.
Look, white guys — stop fighting. Just be this. The girls will still come. You'll still get attention. Just give up the edge.
No need to be strong. No need to resist. No need to mean anything dangerous.
Pete is the safety valve.
He looks like the reward, but he’s really the proof that the old model is gone.
You're not wrong for feeling sick every time they push his name. You're just not asleep.
You still feel the real axis of attraction, and you know damn well he’s not it.
