>>214244854
>Just because having two Batmen at once will be a confusing trainwreck?
Yes. The real issue here is that there's no good way out of this mess. Walter Hamada is fucking this company from the grave. Taking your single most important character and making an entirely standalone movie that has nothing to do with your current cinematic universe, or the standalone Joker films, or anything you mith be doing in the future and just having it floating on an island by itself in the middle of all your other plans was so retarded it bordered on sabotage. It didn't fit into their immediate plans or their long-term plans, and it was kind of successful but not successful enough that they can just cast everything else aside and focus on it exclusively.
And despite what retards on this board seem to think general audiences (you know, the people you have to appeal to if you're going to make movies with budgets in the hundreds of millions) don't want multiple versions of everything simultaneously or a new actor playing Batman once every two years. This sort of fractured continuity works with hardcore autist comic crowd who don't mind keeping mental spreadsheets to keep track of which parallel universe which version of each character belongs to but most people it's more trouble than it's worth.
The situation is just a land mine no matter how you handle it If you cancel it, you piss off a portion of the fanbase. If you just keep Batman in his own separate universe it takes a hugely important character out of the new DCU. And if you have 2 different Batmans going simultaneously you're dividing the fanbase and fatiguing the plebs twice as fast. The only real solution would have been to never make this movie to begin with
