>>214249368 (OP)
He didn’t.
The entire case was reverse engineered to fit him after the FBI told the local police to make him their suspect. Local police even dropped their investigation into other DNA evidence that implicated multiple other people, such as DNA under the victims nails. It was mostly likely a drug related murder and the cops in that town were likely involved in the business.
The official story is that Bryan decided to target that house, yet he had no prior contact or relationship with the victims what so ever. Why them?
Supposedly, Bryan entered the house and killed three girls and one of their boyfriends, using a Kabar knife in a matter of a few minutes, then left the house. However, the police say he left the knife sheath at the scene where a single skin cell was found and that cell was a match to him. This is the single key piece of evidence used to put him at the scene.
Also, Bryan failed to kill the two other girls in the house and didn’t even assault them, despite that one of the girls claimed to have seen his face: she claimed to have opened her door and witnessed a man dressed in all black and wearing a ski mask, but she could see he had a big nose and bushy eyebrows.
> why did Bryan target these strangers and why did he only kill 4/6 people that lived in the house?
> brutally killing four people with a knife would be very loud, why didn’t the 2 other roommates call the police?
> Why did they wait over 8 hours before calling the police?
> Why did they invite a dozen friends over in the morning before calling the police?
>Why did one of them tell the cops they likely wouldn’t find any DNA evidence because they deep cleaned the house the weekend prior? Cleaning the prior weekend wouldn’t matter if the murder just happened.
> why were the cops called not for a murder, but because one of the guests saw a dead girl and believed she was unconscious? There would have been lots of blood, nobody would mistake that for being unconscious.
