Thread 214254799

A printed note. I mean, come on. Took me out of it.

What did you expect it to be, a piece of shit with a message written on it?

>>214254824
I don't know, maybe I'd expect le super secret thousand years old pulling the world's strings conspiracy not to leave such an obvious trail of evidence of its mere existence

>>214254799 (OP)
Do you know why your printer wont print when you run out of yellow ink?

>>214254799 (OP)
it's a completely anonymous and untraceable method of communication

>>214254937
When you make a movie, you can put whatever retarded shit you want in it

>>214254799 (OP)
Times new roman is what bothers me. Why not Aria

>>214254965
printers leave invisible watermarks on everything you print. they're traceable by design.

>>214254946
https://www.elitefourum.com/t/many-of-the-pokemon-playtest-cards-were-likely-printed-in-2024/52421
Still love this story

>>214254965
See
>>214254946
>>214255024

>>214254937
Wouldn't the conspiracy have a hacked printer that doesn't leave dots?

if they're so good why isn't the text properly indented and justified?

>>214255474
There is a secret code hidden within their formating.

>>214254799 (OP)
They didn't even have the decency to use Comic Sans.

>>214255421
how else could we achieve machine-like typefaces on our cards

>>214255708
do you think typewriters print variable-width text? they're computing the correct kerning between different letter pairs...?

>>214255806
you know it's just a piece of paper sitting between to clamps, right? you can move it if you want "variable width" or whatever the new faggy trend is

>>214255843
that won't change the typeface though will it, fucknugget.

might as well get your font on woodblocks.

>>214255087
Christ, that is terrible.

Lots of Chinese brand printers don't print the snitch dots btw

Redpill me on how printers work. Why can't you just give a fake name and pay cash for a used printer? What difference would it make then if they know what printer it came from?

It's quite insane to me that the general public happily ate the information about the snitch dots even when it was widely publicized.

>>214256077
With any advancements in forensics, the goal is not to solve 100% of the crimes. That's just not realistic regardless of the method. The goal is to solve *enough* of the crimes, which will also considerably drive down the amount of potential crime that would have happened but the perpetrators decided not to do it because they're aware of the law enforcement's general efficiency.

>>214256077
What the authorities want is to be able to confirm the printer in your house is thr same type that printed a document. It's not about registering every printer.

>>214255421
You can do it yourself with some software if you want

>>214254799 (OP)
>not one, but two runts
Sloppy typesetting. Masons would never.

>>214255708
It's not just about the dot. The whole process, paper, envelope, delivery can leave traces. It is also a document that acknowledges the conspiracy exists. It's stupid.

>>214254937
>obvious trail of evidence of its mere existence
There's nothing in the letter that reveals anything of the sort. Its an ominous letter with clear underlying tone of violence to be expected if he keeps looking into where he ought not to and it was delivered to him personally by someone who didn't look like they were fucking around.

>>214256077
date and serial number, so they could compare any printed document to anything else you've printed. say you're a suspect, and they have any other document.

the BTK Killer got caught because he sent the police a floppy disk. he'd deleted his files, but they could still recover the metadata of a Word document, including that it was created by a user called 'Dennis'. welp.

>>214256248
whats a runt?

>hey what happened to the girls and the blow?
>oh the guy who put this party together discovered a crasher so we have to all go into the main room and watch his theater kid games for a few minutes

>>214256453
>guys when you coom please clean up after yourselves, the staff have the night off.

>>214256377
Single word at the end of a sentence alone by itself on a new
line.

>>214254799 (OP)
Why a comma after useless and not after inquiries?

>>214256746
I personally like doing this in my texts when I have control over line width and therefore line breaks.
It visually separates paragraphs from each other better.

>>214256377
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Widows_and_orphans

>>214256849
A single line break is superior to a
runt.

Runts just look bad.

>>214254946
>>214254965
>>214255024
Do you faggots not know about typewriters?

look another retard >>214256972

>>214255024
Not if they used a typewriter, they were still around in 1999.

>>214256933
Line breaks, yes. But also, short final lines in paragraphs on top of that. Not necessarily always single-word. But less than 1/3 of the total line width. That looks good.

>>214257072
Short final lines are not runts, so I'm not really sure why you replied to that. They're just a common occurrence.