>>214311114
fairly accurate.
i didn't enjoy seeing superman super weak in every way for the whole film. starts off battered and has his bones broken and shoulders dislocated etc all the way to the end. never seen superman so weak, and it didn't add depth to his character either.
i can see how children would like the film, if they've never seen superman before. it's full of anime style characters, the dog, the stupid sidekicks, the cartoonyness of the whole thing.
i just finished watching man of steel for the first time about half an hour ago or less.
it was alright, I like the superman portrayal, but it's missing the whole middle of the film. it goes instantly from him becoming superman to having to save the world from the general he'd been told about 5 seconds before.
it felt very mechanical, like it was a transformers film, the justice league felt like that too, lots of metal crap and no point to it.
pity Henry Caville couldn't be superman again, he was good for the role.
lots didn't make sense in the film, felt like they were chopping and changing things to try to keep the audience from guessing the next bit, but in that way it felt forced.
i doubt anything will top Christopher reeve's superman, especially the first one - it had it all, felt like a film for one, cohesive, and was family friendly, did mahlke you hope for him, show a little weakness for him but not too much, and felt real enough while also being a comic.
superman 2 was good too, which is mostly what man of steel followed.
i never bothered with the superman before caville, a friend saw it at the cinema and said it was just a lame remake.