>>214317899
What you're describing isn't what Dunning and Kruger were researching at all.
The Dunning-Kruger-Effect describes the phenomenon that a person with limited education/knowledge/experience about a subject will think of himself a master because he doesn't have the necessary metacognitive abilities to understand that their knowledge about said subject is limited and below average. As a consequence they overestimate their own knowledge about said subject. The same is true the other way around, as in actual masters underestimating their capabilities, but this isn't important here.
What you're describing isn't a Dunning-Kruger-Effect, but just a stupid person intimidated by a more intelligent person and their - subconscious - coping mechanism.
Also, your example is pretty flawed, as there's at least 3 types of people who can react to your argument:
1) the one you described, incorrectly, as someone showing the Dunning-Kruger-Effect: a simple midwit who gets angry at people more intelligent than him.
2) The second type you described, who understood what you said.
3) People like me who have no idea what you just said because it's absolutely not their field of expertise but who still have the metacognitive ability to simply understand that they didn't understand you because - as said - it's not their field of expertise.
Funnily enough, as you were talking about the Dunning-Kruger-Effect, it's actually you who displayed it in his post.
