>>214320707 (OP)
I don't see any problem with a film criticizing any group for the actions or tendencies or even stereotypes about some members of that group.
>>214320793
I sure do love women that say the most unhinged shit then when people rightfully call her a stupid fuck, she does the "I was only pretending" bit.
But fundamentally the white guy in question isn't privileged (he lives in a shitty apartment and had to buy the bargain-basement model sexbot) or lonely (his friends are part of the movie and Kat is some kinf of gf/fwb). This isn't about misandry, this is about being basically wrong about the movie RACHEL you fucking CUNT.
>>214321805 >Pink tax
I'm not even going to touch the other shit because this one by itself is so dumb.
The example of women's razors is the example that is always brought up to back this "pink tax" bullshit up, but then that begs the question: Why not just buy the "blue" razor?
>>214321889
Women will complain about the "pink tax" to people in their immediate vicinity, but they won't actually contact the corporations that are supposedly oppressing them, or even avoid giving them money, because that would be slightly awkward.