>>214393298
>>214393302
Real arguments for not using AI in the film industry
focus on the potential for job displacement, a decline in creativity, ethical and legal issues, and the diminishing of human connection that audiences expect from cinema. Unlike standard technological advancements, AI's ability to imitate and generate creative work threatens the foundational, human-centric values of filmmaking.
AI stifles creative integrity and originality
Filmmaking is a collaborative, human-driven art form. Over-relying on AI threatens to make the creative process formulaic and sterile.
Homogenization of content: AI models are trained on existing data, meaning they may be inclined to produce content that follows established, proven formulas. This reliance on data-driven insights to achieve mass appeal could result in a creative landscape dominated by risk-averse, generic stories that lack originality and surprise.
Loss of unique human voice: The distinct voice and perspective of a human writer, composer, or artist could be overshadowed by an algorithm designed for efficiency. This reliance on AI could diminish the depth and nuance that comes from lived human experience, making the final product emotionally hollow.
Erosion of artistic craft: The hands-on work of skilled artisans, from writers to visual effects (VFX) artists, is a core part of filmmaking. If AI automates or shortcuts these crafts, it could lead to a decline in craftsmanship and prevent emerging artists from developing their skills.
It leads to mass job displacement
