>>215175833
What do you mean "how is it possible"? He cropped it, you fucking troglodyte. Are you such a fucking retarded zoomer that you don't know what cropping is? That an aspect ratio that isn't chinese-vision-tier boggles your mind? Or are you so fucking incomprehensibly mind-shattered by the possibility of an aspect ratio that isn't 16:9 / 16:10, that you feign stupidity to marvel at how a basic fucking image can be cropped to non-widescreen proportions? Oh, I know, you're going to play it off, pretend like you were talking about something else, other than the direct thing you were actually fucking asking about, to make sure everyone on here doesn't immediately laugh at your braindead zoomerism, but I assure, I know, we'll all know. Even on this anonymous imageboard, we will all know and remember the fucking retarded zoomer dipshit who said "HOW CAN AN IMAGE BE TALLER THAN IT IS WIDE?!" and you will live with it till the day you fucking die, so you remember to never again post something so god damn insufferably retarded on here again, wasting everyone's time just by simply reading your post, or pausing to see what trifling dumbness they may have stumbled upon when browsing through it casually, all because your parents were too busy blowing into each other's assholes like retarded clowns pretending they're inflatable balloons, to teach you the basics of the proportional relationship between an image's width and its height.
Fucking hell.
