Thread 215196451

What am i in for?

>>215196451 (OP)
Absolute kino.
Everything you watch after this will pale in comparison.

>>215196451 (OP)
Dudes walking in a line into enemy fire instead of taking cover.

>>215196451 (OP)
A most excellent kino.

K I N O

>>>/wsg/5996796

>>215196477
>>215196524
Is it better than 2001?

>>215196483
>I know better than 180 iq military geniuses
every fucking time some retard redditor watches a musket movie

>>215196451 (OP)
You better not be watching it on your phone, iphoneposter

>>215196547
More memorable.

>>215196547
I think so.

>>215196451 (OP)
its boring and dumb

>>215196451 (OP)
Barry Lyndon.

>>215196672
But enough about you.

>>215196672
Found the capeshit fan.

English are revolting

Lord bullingdon MOGGING Bazza

>>215196727
Dumb frogposter.

>>215196451 (OP)

literally me, the movie

>>215196451 (OP)
Best Kubrick

>>215196451 (OP)
It should have been 1 hour shorter, half of the time nothing happens, especially in the second half. People say that some shots look nice like paintings but if I wanted to see paintings I'd go to a fucking art gallery.

>>215196903
Not understanding adventure is sometimes boring

>>215196451 (OP)
I know an Irishman irl who's life was an echo of this dude's so hard that when I showed him the movie he stopped talking to me.

>>215196451 (OP)
faustian spirit

>>215197102
But he's also from Cork, so maybe they're just like that.

>>215197125
he'll be back, don't worry about it laddy

>>215197102

there's definitely an aimless type who just bumbles around working in bars in Europe or construction in America and just takes whatever opportunities life throws at him

a movie you're not old or wise enough to understand its magnitude

>>215197234
Seems pretty straightforward

Kiss me boy

>>215196451 (OP)
>What am i in for?

Filmed under all natural lighting.

Best to watch this in the evening, so you can actually see the movie.

>>215196593
Ah the netflix remake

>>215196451 (OP)
People dressed in period clothing, standing around as if they are reenacting 18th-century paintings.

>>215196451 (OP)
why is 18th century kino so rare

>>215196451 (OP)
I dislike the narration.

>>215198321
cuz the whites still had monarchs and control of (some) of their banks and a will of their own this was before the yids killed them all in ww1 and then finished the job in ww2 so it's a history "they" weren't as involved in creating so they aren't interested in propagandizing it

>>215196547
Yea. The story is actually good with compelling characters. It probably looks better as well.

It's an unbelievably gorgeous period melodrama, a bit too saccharine at times, but never to an unbearable level
>inb4 The Duellists is better
It's also great but you're just being a contrarian faggot if you post this

>>215198526
duelist is mid bro no one would ever bring it up

>>215198388
Holy redpill.

It's a top 5 movie from the 70s, maybe even number 1. Hard to think of 10 more from that decade to compete with it

>>215198321
The few, the proud, the 18th Century kinos.

Barry Lyndon
Amadeus
Master & Commander
Rob Roy
Treasure Island
Les Miserables
1776
Glory
The Patriot
Last of the Mohicans

Please let me know if I have overlooked a kino.

>>215198833
isn't master and commander 19th century and isn't les miserables too

>>215198865
Forgive me.

>>215198833
yeah glory and amadeus are 19th century too brobro

>>215199011
Thank you for the correction. Now please excuse me, I must be going to commit seppuku.

>>215199055
lol don't sweat it brawdog

>>215198833
>>215199055
1776 is also 19th century.

>>215199082
Much obliged.

>>215199097
Begone, troll.

>>215196547
maybe, maybe not

>>215196547
Barry Lyndon is slightly more ironic so its worse.

>It was in the reign of George III that the aforesaid personages lived and quarreled; good or bad, handsome or ugly, rich or poor they are all equal now
I cum

>>215199294
Say more. I didn’t think it was ironic, but it’s Kubrick doing a British period piece, so that doesn’t seem out of the question. Educate me.

>>215196547
100%
but only if you fuck

>>215196844
this

>>215196451 (OP)
k i n o

>>215196616
That TV is barely bigger than a laptop. Is this in some god-forgotten b&b ran by a 70 year old woman?

How period accurate was it with the makeup and costumes?

>>215198833
Count of Monte Cristo takes place in the early 19th century around 1815-1830, some of the older film versions are pretty kino like the 1975 version with Richard Chamberlain.
Captain Blood is 17th century around 1685-88. The 1935 film with Basil Rathbone and a young Errol Flynn feels very dated audio/visual wise but it's still fun.

>>215199482
>>>/lgbt/

>>215196451 (OP)
An actual time portal to the past.

>>215196672
This

>>215196672
this except it's actually funny and interesting

>>215199482
Some of the costumes were literally museum pieces from the period, not replicas

>>215199474
In a couple months I’m going to be living on a ship so this is pretty luxurious

Just finished it… definitely wasn’t boring for a three hour movie. Beautiful shot and satisfying

>>215199319
they dont make em like this no more

>>215198833
Welp, since the time periods are all fucked up I’ll throw this into the mix
Good list either way