Anonymous
10/15/2025, 12:03:07 AM
No.215240059
>>215240153
>>215240325
>>215240334
>>215240539
>>215240623
>>215240806
>>215241913
>>215245426
>>215245456
>>215245496
Poetry is superior to film. This is an undeniable fact and you are free to cope as you want. Where is the Milton, Yeats, Pindar, Aeschylus, Shakespeare, Dante, Browning of film? In terms of aesthetical sensitivity and creative pliability, poetry is effortlessly superior to film, because its medium is language itself, and a universal embodiment of the feelings inherent to a language. Almost all cultures have poetry. Meanwhile film is only a series of photographs of reality stacked together. In poetry one has a vision of life, as great and deep as culture itself, echoing throughout the centuries, and an implicit moral standard of conduct for ones own thoughts and actions. But in film one only has entertainment.
>A race may civilize itself BY LANGUAGE, not film. Cat People is filth.
- Ezra Pound's 1942 review of Cat People
>It is only by Art, and especially by Poetry, that the imagination is regulated. Nothing is more frightful than imagination without taste.
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Maxims and Reflections
>A race may civilize itself BY LANGUAGE, not film. Cat People is filth.
- Ezra Pound's 1942 review of Cat People
>It is only by Art, and especially by Poetry, that the imagination is regulated. Nothing is more frightful than imagination without taste.
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Maxims and Reflections