>>215283643
listen man, this isn't even close to my subject of study or interest, but if you really want to learn about the origins and teological justifications of christian aniconism, i've read this like 15 years ago for a course. I'm not gonna go bring up a 2000 page book I had to read parts of to elaborate, but as I've said before: neither calvinism nor greek orthodoxy were worried with idolatry, they had the same pov as Mohammed that ALL figurative art was a challenge to god. The way you try to dismiss calvinism as some sort of niche fundamentalism when A) it is still very influential in protestantism worldwide and B) catholics, lutherans and anglicans all at some point had some issue with icons and images, ranging from accusations of idolatry to the above-mentioned total anti-art stance and C) muslim art, both representative and abstract exist regardless of hadiths (which I never read) (with C.1 being that the vast majority of christians, including calvinism, simply don't follow every rule to the letter), I think you don't want clarification as much as you want to believe that every muslim is some type of caveman scared of drawings.
This is a /tv/ board and 71 one posts in no one bought Abbas Kiarostami up, that should tell everyone something about how much you retards know about a muslim being allowed to produce images or not.
