>At the end of the day, "Woke" is just a term that gamers use to describe games with ugly people as NPCs and protagonist.

You can't prove this wrong

Lara's tight pitpussy suck and fuck.
On another note kill all phoneposters.

Ugly women are central to the leftist religion. Feminism is at the core of leftism, and a core pillar of feminism is inflating the sexual and social value of ugly and fat women. They hope to accomplish this by elevating women above men in every social and legal way, and by social engineering methods (ie media and games). So, yes, ugly "people" (it's just the women that are ugly) in games is the definition of woke.

>>712783424
very insightful.

>>712783314 (OP)
shes filthy, i wanna wash her clean, dry her off and put her in clean clothes.

>>712783314 (OP)
I don't want to prove that wrong

>>712783314 (OP)
terrible form

>>712783605
Your definition of feminism is skewed. Feminists want women in general to be considered equal to men in all socio-economic aspects. It has nothing to so with ugly women pr beautiful women.

>>712783723
This. Her finger would have burnt.

>>712783730
This isn't the 1900s anymore anon. Get up to date on feminism.

Woke is intersectionality.

>>712783812
can you substantiate your claims on how feminism has changed ?

>>712783314 (OP)
Why do retards persist in acting like woke is ill defined?
A game is woke when it's used for leftist idpol messaging at the expense of aesthetics, design, plot, or any combination of those things.
It's called this because during the 2010's people lauded such on-the-nose political slacktivism as 'woke' and they considered this a compliment, only acting as if they didn't understand the term once people who opposed them used it as an identifier for what they disliked.

>>712783730
>"equal"
I don't see them advocating for equality in family courts, government jobs, teaching jobs, reproduction (all things clearly in their favor). I don't see them advocating for equality in undesirable and dangerous jobs. They only want "equality" in outcome at the highest level of success. Every woman thinks she deserves the same financial success as a CEO, the same social success as Chad super model, and the same preference under the law as a jewish lawyer. Women outnumber men in secondary education almost 2 to 1 now, and their response to this is to mock men for it, rather than cry about "systemic inequality". When boys are failed by public institutions it's because they're inferior, when women are, it's because they're being oppressed.

>>712783901
>woke is intersectionality
>"intersectionality : A feminist sociological methodology of studying the relationships among multiple dimensions and modalities of social relationships and subject formations"
What exactly is wrong with this?

>>712784102
Perhaps "equity" would have been a better term to use instead of "equality" in >>712783730.

>>712784074
>Why do retards persist in acting like woke is ill defined?
Because it is. For example: people like stellar blade is "anti-woke" when it absolutely nothing but have attractive women in it. That by itself implies "woke = ugly, not-woke = sexy". That's all there is to it.

>>712784187
Because intersectionality is just individualism that stops halfway through the reasoning and chooses arbitrary and superficial criteria to divide people into groups that are pitted against one another.

>>712783730
Hot women have it good, hot men have it good, ugly men can work their way to success albeit with a handicap, ugly women are worthless to everyone. Promoting ugly women so the social hierarchy goes hot women = ugly women > hot men > ugly men is literally what feminism is about.

>>712783605
it's not even new.

>>712784843
>ugly women are worthless to everyone
clearly you haven't been to any modern day tech workplace. Even the ugliest of women have a much easier time getting promoted than a man.

>>712784408
It's anti-woke (which is a dumb term) because it doesn't do what I just now fucking defined for you, it doesn't push leftist idpol messaging at the expense of aesthetics or design.
Whether the women are ugly or pretty is only tertiarily important to that.
Banjo kazooie isn't woke because Grunty is an ugly woman, because there isn't any fucking political messaging. Her being ugly isn't there to serve some grandstanding notion of representation or the deconstruction of the male gaze.

>>712783314 (OP)
I honestly don't care if a game is woke or not, if it looks interesting then I'm going to play it, and if it's good then I'll enjoy it. As far as games that made /v/ seethe because of wokeness go, I liked AC Shadows, Tales of Kenzera, South of Midnight and the new Indiana Jones.
I'm capable of enjoying woke games, but it doesn't seem like wokies are capable of enjoying games that aren't made for them, as demonstrated by them shitting on Stellar Blade since its announcementlast year. Sure, I'll admit Stellar Blade has a forgettable plot and bland characters, but I've yet to see a legitimate argument being made against its combat, level design and music, which more than make up for the weak story.

>>712784932
They naturally have no value. You're just proving that feminism is achieving their goal of putting all women above men.

>>712784965
yet you don't see Banjo Kazooie being paraded as the beacon of anti-woke. Don't you see the disparity?

>>712784268
Equity exclusively for women with the most successful men. That's the definition of feminism. Not even equity with average men, as they already have vastly better treatment and outcome to the average man.

>>712783424
Phoneposters are based though, they can just dodge all bans at will and all jannies can do is seethe.
Observe:
Niggers will NEVER be human.

>>712784981
>I'm capable of enjoying woke games, but it doesn't seem like wokies are capable of enjoying games that aren't made for them
Because they don't play video games, regardless of being made for them or not.

>>712785176
You say that as if ban evading is somewhat difficult on a desktop.

>>712784074
>Why do retards persist in acting like woke is ill defined?
They are bad faith leftoids and centroid sympathizers trying to muddy the waters for their own social engineering.
Of course, there are genuinely low iq normieniggers out there who probably don't get it either, but they dont usually care enough to get into a pissing war on the internet over it.

>>712783314 (OP)
This is wrong. Ren and Stimpy is a cartoon that may predates wokeness, but also does not register as woke whatsoever despite the deliberately grotesque characters and animations. The grotesque has been a part of art for as long as art as been around having deliberately grotesque protagonists has been around just as long.

The thing that defines wokeness is not presenting ugliness, but normalizing it. Characters are obese, women are deliberately made unappealing, despite any real eroticism at all there is lots of pro-gay signaling, etc. Wokeness is almost daring you to notice the ugliness so you can be socially punished for it.

>>712785253
They do, though, that's why Deltarune is selling like hot cakes

>>712783314 (OP)
nu tomb raider is fun and hot
fuck you

>>712783424
>On another note kill all phoneposters.
I cannot die.

>>712785057
Because it's not a new release, you obtuse dingbat.
People don't need to parade around old games and say how they weren't woke, it's completely safe assumption because this is a new thing.
A current thing.
So obviously when something deviates from the current thing - which is apparently being a smug virtue signalling git that ruins your own game for brownie points - then people talk about it, and hold it up and say
>Look, it IS possible to make a game in 2025 that isn't patronizingly talking down to my sensibilities, it turns out a video game can just be a fucking piece of entertainment!

>>712785307
My desktop IP isn't variable and I haven't cared enough to find solutions I don't have to pay for.
I just cycle airplane mode, clear cookies, and picture the fat brown jannies seething helplessly over it.
It just wurks

>>712785353
Deltarune is just teen drama, a genre that's been consistently popular since the 80s.

>>712783314 (OP)
I want more plain or even ugly looking npcs. Not everyone in a setting is a supermodel or has access to makeup or plastic surgery

>>712785464
>My desktop IP isn't variable

>>712785568
Xfinity sucks but its what I've got, what can I say
I'm sure there's solutions out there but like I said, I'm not paying and I'm too lazy to look
A phone with a Bluetooth keyboard is about as good for shitposting with anyway

>>712783314 (OP)
>games with ugly people
Hilarious if comment is real. It just means they finally admit their games are ugly.

>>712783314 (OP)
Characters can be ugly without it being a gay political ideology-driven decision, which is very obviously when that's the case, and normal people are in the right for having an issue with this.

>>712783730
>Feminists want women in general to be considered equal to men
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

>>712785464
What the fuck? In first world countries you have to pay extra for static IP so you don't host shit.
Dynamic IPs are the standard.

>>712783314 (OP)
In the coming years you will see trannies grow more and more desperate to define what woke means. This of course comes after them saying it didn’t exist in the first place and was completely made up. They will do everything they can to avoid the cultural marxist and idpol bullshit because they know they can’t defend it.

>>712783314 (OP)
woke is when a game is being preachy in the modern day and it takes you out of the immersion

>>712783314 (OP)
"woke" is when a game's developer even suggests that treating ppl with basic fucking respect is Good Actually

>>712785853
If it is dynamic (not like I memorize my IP number, so maybe its changing and I simply haven't noticed) it doesn't switch more often than every 3 days since I always have to wait those bans out on my desktop
/v/ - ban evasion discussion

>>712786041
Y'all are right but remember these mfs picked a literal nazi to run this country.

>>712783791
And the feather fletches would get tangled in her hair

>>712783730
That was first and second wave feminism. Third and fourth wave want to make women have more rights than men.

>>712786042
Have you even tried restarting your modem? Same fucking thing as airplane mode.
I hate phoneposters so fucking much it's unreal. You zoomer faggots are just as tech illiterate as boomers.

>>712785960
>>712785950
yall are just mad that noone wanted to come to the orange fascist dipshit's birthday party

>>712786263
Treating women better than men was always end goal. Some feminists are just more upfront about it than others nothing has changed.

>>712786263
All four were wrong and doomed the country, which Jewish figures gleefully aided as best they could.

>>712786041
No one on the internet know anything about basic respect.

>>712786127
Trump's too stupid to be a definitive nazi. He's doing a lot of dumb shit, but he's pretty much speed running a half-assed and that includes the inevitable overthrowing.

>>712784913
Medusa back in Archaic greek times was suppose to be hideously disgusting, and they turned her into a sexy snake lady feminist symbol lol

>>712786345
>Have you even tried restarting your modem?

Your solution is to inhibit my desktop internet for 3-5 minutes (and that of anyone else in my household) instead of just cycling the IP on a dedicated internet connection I just for shitposting, from which I can smoothly and easily ban evade, and then you act smug over it?

Functionally cycling my phone IP and my modem is the same thing, but doing one impacts my usage more than the other. Get it?

It takes a genuine autistic retard to suggest a solution that inconveniences the user *more* and then act smug over it to boot.

>>712783314 (OP)
Woke on paper: being aware of injustices be they social, racial, economical etc and being willing to call it out and try to ellicit change where possible.

Woke in practice:
Misandric (and ironically enough misogynistic, since they're trying to erase women) activism pushed by feminists (lol) and the lgbt+w/h, that bastardizes and mutilates the works of others, piggybacking off of it, shoving minorities, pronouns, gay and trannyshit everywhere cause why not? 9/10 ending in failure. Only keeps being made because of fucking Blackrock, GLAAD, Soros and formerly USAID money. Recent examples: Anything Star Wars, Rings of Power, Tomb Raider, Dragon Age Veilguard, Suicide Squad Kill the justice League, Unknown 9, Lightyear, Cowboy Bebop live action, Ghostbusters, She Hulk, Latest Dr Who, Snow White, AC Shadows, Dustborn, Concord

>>712783314 (OP)
liberal crime squad, the other game made by toady (of dwarf fortress fame) is described as woke, and theres no ugly people.

its text based. text. there is literally no picture of any of the characters.

>>712786730
>Phoneposters are based though, they can just dodge all bans at will and all jannies can do is seethe.
You were too fucking stupid to figure it out and thought that it could only be done on phones but I'm the one that's acting smug?
You are a meme spouting 14 year old, fuck off and kill yourself.

>>712786917
Like I said, hasn't worked because of the nature of my IP provider, you aren't smart for suggesting it, and you definitely aren't smart in light of what I just said.
But keep impotently seething, I guess, lmao.

>>712786626
Yep. the No Kings protest was attended by millions of Americans of all ages, races, and genders. We may actually get a democrat president by the end of the year. Hopefully the MAGApedes finally kill themselves once that happens.

>>712787029
In light of what you said? That you are too fucking incompetent to look up solutions to your problem?
You zoomer faggots spend all day on your phones having most of human knowledge at your fingertips yet you are too incompetent to use it.
No wonder your favorite pastime is complaining about shit that has nothing to do with you.

>>712786791
The problem is have with retards calling everything woke is where does the line end. Isn't woke ultimately now used as a catch-all term by the far-right to refer to literally any minority they don't like? You can't put the genie back in the bottle.

>>712786626
He's literally planning on sending us to die for Israel lolz
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-hints-possible-us-entry-war-amid-stepped-israeli-daytime-attacks-tehran
>Trump Hints At 'Possible' US Entry Into War Amid Stepped-Up Israeli Daytime Attacks On Tehran

>>712783424
Based.

>>712786345
No, they're fucking not. Jesus fuck, I may be old, but I was fucking taught how IP addresses worked in school.
That nigger is just a retarded child.

>>712783314 (OP)
I don't care. I still won't play as a woman.

>>712787261
Blame the people who rubbed the lamp for so long then.

>>712787213
>In light of what you said? That you are too fucking incompetent to look up solutions to your problem?
What problem? I don't have a problem because I've solved it via phoneposting. You are the one with a problem here.
>No wonder your favorite pastime is complaining about shit that has nothing to do with you.
Goddamn that is some of the most on the nose projectiom I have ever seen, lmao.

>>712783314 (OP)
Who are you quoting?

>>712787998
I'm sure you don't have a problem, that's why you are so defensive about being a phoneposting underage newfag.

>>712787261
The line won't end because just as trannies keep coming out with genders and pronouns, so do they keep finding new ways to ruin normal things and thus "that's woke!"

>>712788131
How am I being defensive? I explained my situation and explained why I don't care to find a different solution.
I think you are just looking to argue for no real reason than some superiority complex, which is deeply misfounded for reasons explained earlier.

>>712787175
>two more weeks

Nope. Woke is what pussy ass conservative homos call anti-White, philosemitic faggot shit. that's what woke is, anything that's anti-White, philosemitic faggot shit.

>>712788246
>I think you are just looking to argue for no real reason than some superiority complex
No, it's out of boredom. Phonetoddlers are easy to trigger.

>>712788383
>u mad
no u

>>712783730
Something is what it does and feminism doesn't do that

>>712783314 (OP)
Yes, but unironically.
I hate seeing ugly people. I want to escape from ugly reality into something beautiful.

>>712788447
If I wanted my own comeback I would have wiped it off of your mother's chin last night.

>>712788680
My mother isn't a kleenex wipe, you take that back right now. :(

>>712783730
>feminists want "in general"
See, there's the problem that belies your ignorance of feminism. I promise you I've done more reading on it than you, and I can prove it because you said:
>feminists want in general
See, there is no "general" feminism. There is a complex array of contradictory theorem of varying quality in feminists thought and almost none of it can be considered general.
Even the idea of equality is debated and inside that debate, there varying ideas of what is and isn't equal. For instance medical spending being something that people don't want equality on, because women get pregnant and that should skew spending in a just world.

I don't know bro, if you want to talk about this do more reading.

>>712788856
>See, there is no "general" feminism.
Sure there is, and its captured in the phrase "women should have equal rights as men." That's why they say it.
But to utter it is to deny the differences between the sexes. Why should unequal beings have equal rights? Children don't have the same rights as adults, so clearly the idea that unequal beings have unequal rights is not completely alien to western law.

But yes, start to finish its a deeply harmful idea. The notion that all human beings are completely like-for-like interchangeable parts in the greater machine of society is a deeply poisonous notion that has plagued western civilization every since it accepted it as given. Read >>712786408 if you care about why and how it is harmful.

>>712785450
This is just false. There are so many games in 2025 which don't have any woke agenda in them and yet go unnoticed.

>>712788856
This is absurd. There are various sects within any ideology. It doesn't mean they can't be generalized.

>>712788036
me. I said that.

>>712789351
It's a gradient. Leftoid values are accepted as given. Some games are most of political agendas pushing talking points (Dustborn), some simply take diversity as givens and people such as myself find it distasteful (Exp33)
But hey if you can point me to a game with a cast of white characters where no niggers randomly show up to talk about how globalism is good and normal actually, theres not one line about 'innocent refugees', no muh evil fascism communism good, then point me to it and I'll be happy to give that game a sale.

>>712783314 (OP)
No. "Woke" is anything that makes the most obnoxious faggots screech like pod people if they think that something either contains or is liked by people thought to approve of buzzwords they've been programmed to hate.

It was really funny to watch Bayonetta go from being considered overly sexualized to serve the 'male gaze', over the top, and very problematic and offensive by the equally obnoxious tumblrinas and resetera types, to watch these morons start screaming it was "woke" because Bayo was somehow supposed to be fa tranny (or idealized by trannies) and the the vague tension with Jeanne, and sperging out about Rodin.... only to turn around and deem it "anti-woke" again after Bayo 3's official art shows her settling down with Luca and thus it offended the queers.

The content of the games didn't change one fucking iota, but this distilled culture war shit is more about raging about what you you think the "other side" thinks about the game . I can think of a better definition, something like
-A game that is being self, publisher, or otherwise censored to meet the approval of internal content policy, hired consultancy specifically for this purpose, or external potential playerbase, particularly fear of being seen as offensive by social media leading to PR issues.
but that doesn't mean that anyone else using the term will be using it in the same way Lacking a unified, objective definition and with examples like that ghastly
>woke content detector
site and steam group that is either a parody or so fucking unhinged that it may as well be, I don't know if there's any way to see any value in the term at this point.

>>712789351
That's more a function of oversaturation more than anything.
There were 18,992 games added to steam last year, less than 1% of them were noticed or discussed.
But of the ones with big marketing pushes that people were actually aware of and discussing? Yes, the expectation was that they were 'current thing'.

>>712783314 (OP)
Why would I need to?

>>712787213
>That you are too fucking incompetent to look up solutions to your problem?
this here lies the problem. getting around a ip ban? absolutely trivial, anyone who knows anything can do it.

our userbase is not that. our current userbase is...people born after smartphones, who have never used a desktop, and does not know what a file manager is. which is fine, this weeds out the fucking retards real fast, we didnt want people who didnt know how to beat an ip address ban.

but then mobile phones became a thing and the entry barrier to "beating an ip address ban" changed to "pass out drunk on your bathroom floor shitposting till your mobile phone dies, wake up, recharge the phone and get a new i.p adress". ergo, the gate keeping gate, became...a gate as wide and open as mexican border between the us.

>the barrier to entry here on this website is REALLY LOW, who could NOT figure out how to reset their ROUTER.
yeah, those fucking retards. they are here anyways because they didnt even have to know how to do that. their fucking phones do it for them.

>Stuff I dislike
Woke
>Stuff I like
Not woke
Prove me wrong

>>712789815
The 'current thing' explanation just doesn't cut it. I posit that the very reason why stellar blade or say marvel rivals are chosen as "the anti-woke" games are because of attractive character design when technically there is absolutely nothing that makes them more "anti-woke" than say farming simulator 2025.

>>712788365
Extremely based and accurate
Cuckservatism ultimately fails because it is too scared to call out what the problems actually are

>>712784045
That's pol's department. But late third wave feminisim, and all of fourth wave feminisim, as well as whatever they end up calling post trans feminisim have explicitly abandoned that position in favor of intersectionality, and replacing equal treatment to continuous postitve treatement for women and negative treatment for men in the name of equity.

Followup, of course fucks off to pol.

>>712790021
>farming simulator 2025
Farming your own food is woke. Real men hunt.

>>712784074
Because they want to control and recontextualize it. It's why you had a 500 post thread claiming some nobody's steam curation who is crazier than pol was the true definition of woke. And that thread gets spammed all the time.

>>712785853
It's pretty simple really. Guy and girl find themselves on a deserted island. Maybe they survive a shipwreck or got lost at sea somehow. It doesn't really matter how, all that matters is they wind up on the island.

It isn't as dire as it seems though. They quickly discover that the island has plenty of fresh water and food. They could survive here for years if need be. They have each other, now it is just as matter of waiting to get rescued.

As you can expect, the idea is that the girl in question ends up getting really fat during this "tropical vacation." Even better if at first the girl is really "gung ho" about pulling their weight (no pun intended) and helping their man with all the jobs that need to be done, like building a shelter, gathering food, etc.

But it just end up with them lazing about on the beach getting fatter while their man does all the work and takes care of them.

Maybe to help things along their is a mysterious fruit they find on the island that is almost supernaturally tasty and fattening the girl can't get enough of.

Then the idea is once they are rescued a few months later, everyone would be shocked at how the girl has somehow gained hundreds of pounds stranded on the island.

And of course, with just the two of them, she might also come out of it knocked up as well.

>>712783314 (OP)
Yes. Ban ugliness.

>>712786346
Ah yes the TDS trannies are on the video games board showing they’re just ideologues crying and don’t actually care about quality games.

>>712784074
Ironic when several posts actually agree with the definition in the OP.

>>712790021
Again, anti-woke is a retarded term.
It's the absence of woke, and attractive character designs are just a symptom of that, not a necessary or qualifying factor.

>>712789790
No one was screeching about Bayonetta but you and your fellow trannies. You’re making shit up now because you need to cry and project your bullshit on to your opposition.

>>712783314 (OP)
This is all there is to it. That explains why games with blacks and browns are considered woke immediately even if they actually have any woke idealogy. Look up "the doll experiment" and you'll find that people are conditioned to dislike ugly things. Gamers call these games out as "woke" lacking proper words or rather not wanting to express their true biases out loud.

>>712790801
>hat explains why games with blacks and browns are considered woke immediately even if they actually have any woke idealogy.
That IS the woke ideology.
People know that blacks and browns are ugly, ergo the only reason to put them front and center in your game is if you're trying to make a point.
It's not woke because it's ugly, it's ugly because it's woke.

>>712790801
>actually have
actually don't* have. on a similar note, games with attractive black and brown characters are instantly whitelisted.

>>712783424
fippybippy

>>712790916
>It's not woke because it's ugly
except when it is, amrite? Pic related was called woke even though it had zero narrative or writing shown. For all we know she could be a neo nazi but why did people decry it as "woke" just by appearance?

>>712791138
I'm just going to repeat myself because you either can't read or can't grasp the point I'm making here.
>ugly, ergo the only reason to put them front and center in your game is if you're trying to make a point.

>>712791138
Same with Citi and Witcher 4. People have no issues with Cyberpunk or Witcher 3 and started screaming woke when the only thing we know about Witcher 4 was that it would be about Ciri.

>>712791245
>ugly, ergo the only reason to put them front and center in your game is if you're trying to make a point.
that implied "insidious and evil" point being?

>>712786716
you mean we aren't supposed to want to fuck that monster?

>>712792246
Well Poseidon did

>>712792409
that was before she was turned into a monster thoughbeit

>>712792524
Medusa in the original myths was always a monster, her being turned into one was a roman invention

>>712792657
she was a monster who worshipped Athena in her temple and then was raped by poseidon in the temple so Athena makes her what? It doesn't add up.

>>712791363
>its not true
>okay it is but so what
Just so the casual on looker can keep up with the mental gymnastics of the leftoid at play here

>>712792798
>asking for clarification is a leftoid scheme
Just say that you don't want to explain yourself if you don't want to. okay? This is not a persecution, anon.

>>712783314 (OP)
Woke is:
Making a random character gay
Reducing breast size on a character that had big breasts
Reducing sexyness
Reducing fanservice
Making the woman be main guy in modern warfare
Adding black people in 1800s france[e33]
Adding a black woman with big afro
Adding any lgbtq stuff

It should all be white men for the end of time

>>712790606
>gameplay
Sorry anon, thats not a peer-reviewed source from a preeminent institution so we're going to have to discard it as 'truth' in favor of this kotaku article saying 'dustborn is lowkey kinda good, actually'.

>>712792756
There is no ancient greek source that states that Medusa was a human worshipper of Athena who got turned into a gorgon, but her having (consensual) sex with Poseidon was still a thing. Athena transforming Medusa came from a Roman poet named Ovid

>>712783424
>>712783424
>>712783424
>>712783424
more.....MORE

>>712792947
Spare me the innocence ploy faggot, get a new act.

>>712793079
So without the transformation part, Athena just throws Medusa under the bus to perseus just because she had sex with poseidon in the temple.

>>712793192
*?. forget the question mark

>>712784074
>A game is woke when it's used for leftist idpol messaging at the expense of aesthetics, design, plot, or any combination of those things.
But those things are subjective.
and please define leftist idpol messaging for me cause I'm not clear what that is.

>>712790916
circular reasoning. It's woke because it's ugly and it's ugly because it's woke is what is mostly going on now (not discounting actually wokism by the way).

>>712790479
And there's a bunch of posts saying they disagree with OP. What's your point?

>>712793192
No, Perseus was tasked to kill Medusa to save his mother from getting married to some king. Athena helped him because she usually helps all the greek heroes

>>712783314 (OP)
>Woke" is just a term that gamers use to describe games with ugly people as NPCs and protagonist
There's more but that's a start. Babby steps. Soon they'll stop eating it with the bucket load and then gaming can truly heal. In a decade or so we will look back at the 2011-2025 period the same way people look at public lobotomy services now. What was the purpose? To protect a few castrated men and ugly women from reality? Save the feelings of minorities with inferiority complexes? Promote homosexuality and transvestites/trannies?
>>712783730
>Feminists want women in general to be considered equal to men in all socio-economic aspects
lol, lmao feminism is a female supremacy movement, you see the results all around in culture, in employment, in marriage and divorce, in preferential legal treatment, in preferential hiring practices, basically everywhere. Where you don't see female supremacy is at the cat food and wine isle and in the tictock reels full of post wall women bawling their eyes out crying because they're alone. I never see videos of men crying because they're alone.
>>712783901
>Woke is intersectionality.
Intersectionality is just the science of breaking down societies with migration and feminism. If i go to china and tell them i'm not privileged because i'm not chinese and don't speak the language, they will tell me
>well yes, this is our country, what are you doing here?
because that's what happens when a country isn't a public urinal tier society because it has sovereignty. There's this new imprialism colonialism strategy of pretending peoples and countries don't exist and you're entitled to go anywhere in the world because the world is basically your bitch, because you're a colonial and you have rights wherever you go, because the planet belongs to you. So when you go to a foreign country and the natives don't exactly present themselves with their buttocks spread for your enjoyment, that's called discrimination and racism and even sexism.

>>712793317
it would imply that all those agreeing with it are leftists trying to subvert the definition when in reality they aren't.

>>712793149
They call it "sealioning".

And of course in this culture the correct response is
>Shut the fuck up, lurk the fuck more.

>>712793286
Shut the fuck up. Lurk the fuck more, specifically in pol.

>>712793336
I'm dumb because I can't make proper sense of this the way you put it. What's the moral/point of the myth if the Roman retelling is false? It just seems like a string of unrelated stuff put together.

>>712793347
>I never see videos of men crying because they're alone.
1st day on the internets? haven't seen any gosling posters?

>>712791363
the point is that ugly people are supposed to know their place and them being protagonists is woke, okay?

>>712793607
>haven't seen any gosling posters?
It's a fucking joker posting
>tfw no gf
but he does nothing to get a gf, so that means he doesn't want one, it's simple.
Meanwhile, i see these women who put on 3 buckets of makeup and then go to their cars to vent publicly about how lonely they are for 30sec to 5 minutes. You will never see this type of exhibitionism from men, because it's self humiliating to publicly say you can't get a woman, but for some reason, publicly announcing that you can't get a man to look at you is somehow empowering and cathartic.

Ugliness is morally wrong

>>712784981
Because they're obviously arguing in bad faith, they don't actually care about how Stellar Blade plays, they saw that it has a sexy female MC and that was enough for them to decide it was bad.

>>712793548
Maternal piety, victory of good looking virtue over evil. Was an impossible task from an evil king.

>>712791363
>that implied "insidious and evil" point being?
That you're a fucking chud if you think Joanna Dark shouldn't look like a manjawed dyke.
These games aren't for you, oversexualized patriarchal gamers, we've removed the male gaze and updated it to be positive representation.

Fuck off, you know exactly what it means when they take a female character and turn down the femininity and/or sex appeal severely.

>>712794194
Yes, unironically. Most white people instinctively know the difference between that which is beautiful and that which is ugly. To glorify the ugly at the cost of the beautiful is immoral.

>>712783314 (OP)
Woke is an ideology/religious cult full of "the good people" on the far left. It's a catch-all term for feminists, neo-marxists, moralizing karens, and other weird/crazy/evil extremists. They're the counterpart to the far right religious/racist extremists. Both sides are extremely racist, tribal, stupid, and controlling. None of these people can think for themselves and they value feelings and power/control over truth and fairness.

>>712783730
Your definition is skewed by our culture. You're literally brainwashed if you believe FEMINISM is about EQUALITY or FAIRNESS. Men have more social issues than women do, especially in 2025, that's just a fact. Men don't even have the right to the skin on their dicks, ffs. Men and women aren't equal and will never be equal because equal means the same. Women's issues are heard and addressed. People actually care about women. (/children, and dogs) No one gives a fuck about men. You're living in a dream world, Neo.

>>712794194
>Ugliness is morally wrong

Define ugly. What if I think you're ugly? Does that mean you have to die?

>>712795673
>People actually care about women

Do you care about women? I don't know why you'd say that unless you did. I've never had a female friend in my life, and I don't play games where you're forced to play as a woman.

>>712783314 (OP)
Ugly women are one of the main staples of woke invaders, but it's not the only one.

>>712795734
>Define ugly.
Here you go.

>>712796262
You didn't even address my entire post, which was one line. I'm filtering your image now. I have the vast majority of the board automatically filtered if you'd like to post in another thread. I think I'll add this thread to the 99% filtered section. Only other thread is page 8, which is nice.

>>712783314 (OP)
>pushing gayfaggot agenda
woke
>not pushing gayfaggot agenda
not woke
simple as

>>712796431
>I have the vast majority of the board automatically filtered
what a bitch xD

>>712786716
She was supposed to be cursed by a jealous Greek god for being too beautiful.

>at the end of the day, [insert buzzword here] is just a term normalfaggots use to describe games with attractive people as NPCs and protagonist
i can do it too
fuck off from my hobby and this plane of existence, troon

>>712796431
I didn't ask and don't care. Cope about it nigger.

>>712786408
that image is retarded but somehow the worst part of it is defending homeschooling. All that talk about protecting the child's growth by having a mother at home but then suggesting to socially stunt them by robbing them of the opportunity to interact in society with different people their age

>>712797012
Yeah wouldn't want to be weird like those homeschooled kids. They don't even believe in the 52 genders!

>>712797093
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zu_eDxflkMc

>>712797093
children need to introduced to society at an early age so you fucking retard. They NEED to have basic social skills with people their age.
If anything that image you posted speaks volumes about the state of american education. If some weird loser at home can compete with actual educational instutions then its obvious tha something has been going wrong with america. Pull up stats from europe or china or japan or brazil or any other country that has a REAL interest in making sure their citizens receive the highest level of education possible

>>712783730
The movement changed shape and meaning many times since then

>>712796631
Correct, correct aaand correct.

>>712794625
you don't even know if it's the same woman or whether dark is just a codename. also, why do you think every woman must be pretty according to your standards ?

>>712795891
I don't, really. But in general I think humanity cares more about women than men. Feminism wouldn't have taken over our entire culture the way it did if people didn't care about women and their social grievances.

>>712797305
I get it, you feel like if kids aren't collectively herded into nigger-riddled jewish indoctrination camps, there's no possible way you could have human interaction.
I'm just here to tell you that your false dichotomy is dumb and you are also dumb.

>>712784408
It isn't, leftard.
Woke is a religion with various talking points.
Christianity isn't many religions or badly defined just because it has 10 commandments

>>712784981
Disingenuous post.
Woke games cannot be good or interesting.
It's like saying "If shit tastes good..."

>>712785404
it's dogshit, alme and ugly
and it's not tomb raider and that shitface is not Lara

>>712785538
>I want more plain or even ugly looking npcs.
keep your mental illness for yourself
>Not everyone in a setting is a supermodel or has access to makeup or plastic surgery
you'll get to make that arguemnt when 99% of characters are supermodel-tier and you are complaiing to have more of your ugly fetish characters

why cant troons just make their own games?
why do they have to infect and corrupt existing ones?

>>712786346
Everyone ovted against you, even "your" side
also thank you for confirming that your interest in this hobby begins and ends with political activism, loser

>>712798723
cause they want to push their gay shit to (you), and if they mark their game as gay you simply won't buy it, see dustborn

>>712786127
I wish retards who use fascism/nazism to indicate people that diagree with their stupid failed religion would actually try a month of the real deal, for some perspective

>>712789967
Not all bad shit is woke
not all non woke shit I like
BTFO, sophist

>>712790021
the opposite of woke is jsut normality.
There is no anti-woke

>>712798806
why do they want to push their gay shit on me?
i aint buying their shit either way

>>712783424
What a poorfag thing to say

>>712783314 (OP)
Don't care; you lost.

>>712783314 (OP)
Wrong. Woke is more than just ugly characters. Its also modern progressive politics, behaviour and gender ideology

>>712798815
Yeah, imagine how bad it would be if jews were legally required to identify themselves, tranny surgical books were burned enmass, and the economy was completely revitalized from one of the worst depressions the world had ever seen.

>>712797781
>It's not happening, and even if it is, why does it matter?
Why make her unattractive if it doesn't matter? Why change her appearance at all? Why keep the same name and hair color if it's a new character?
The answer is fuck you, because you know the entire point of this is to take something people liked and make some misguided stand about it being empowering for a purely fictional CGI woman to be less attractive.
This. This is the essence of woke. Because there is Zero.
Zero fucking reason to change the design (or character) in this way OTHER than to make some dumb fucking sociopolitical point, all you've done is make your game worse.
It's not more marketable. It's not what the fans were calling for.
It's just to virtue signal.

>>712783314 (OP)
If every character in Veilguard were conventionally attractive would "pulling a Bharv" stop being woke bullshit?

>>712793303
then keep ugly ugly and plain shit out of entertainment?

>>712786041
Woke means pro human. Anti woke means anti human.

>>712786626
He's stupid enough to be a Nazi but he has no ideological conviction. He's in it for Trump and Trump only.

>>712796431
>>712795734
Human braing evolved for billions of years to be capable of telling the difference between ugly and beautiful.
I'm sorry you were left behind

>>712794194
>People have officially reverted to strawman characters in 90's Disney movies.
Wow.

>why does it matter if a character is hot?
If it doesnt matter, why are progressives championing ugly character so hard

Could have remained with the old standard of everyone being hot if it didnt matter

But it obviously did matter to them big time

>>712802065
only anti SOME "humans". Big difference

>>712797093
Homeschooling has been proven to have demonstrably poor effects on social development, less friends, less chance of romantic fulfillment, and higher rates of suicide.

>>712799819
Nonsequitur
and I'm not one one who believe those regimes never did anything good or didn't build anything. That would be a comunist regime

>>712802318
To be anti some humans is the same thing as being anti human because it means you don't believe in humanity. It's essentially self identifying as a non human.

>>712797781
Because my standards are objective standards we evolved though all history and natural history
and there isn't a single valid reason to not have beautiful things in entertainment
good to look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not good to look at

>>712799819
Mass murder, book burnings, and a economy build 100% on looting and plundering is bad.

>>712800897
obviusly not
>>712802065
lmao since when?

>>712802364
Agree. The point is that the normal way is currently worse

>>712802410
Thanks for confirming to me that the anti white people crowd are anti human. You DO agree with that, right? Right??

>>712802483
>mass murder
Literal fake news
>book burnings
Nah that's good if the books are degenerate filth (which they were)
>an economy build 100% on looting and plundering
You have nothing in your empty skull but post WW2 Jewish propaganda.

>>712802471
>there isn't a single valid reason to not have beautiful things in entertainment
of course there is. Any entertainment true to real life can have ugly people in it.

>>712799863
>OTHER than to make some dumb fucking sociopolitical point
What fucking point? There is no point. How is having a woman who is less attractive to you as a videogame charcater woke?

>>712802471
>Because my standards are objective standards we evolved though all history and natural history
1: Nature fallacy. 2: History fallacy. 3: You are most likely wrong as well.

>>712802778
I would if white was a actual real group that existed. It's not, that's the issue. Discrimination against ethnic groups. White is at best a made up lie, at worst simply an excuse to do evil.

If I made up a group, and then claimed you were discriminating against that group. Would you accept that?

>>712803062
>They killed 27% of the soviet union by accident, anon.
>This is somehow better.
Also holocaust did happen. 6 million Jews died. That is mass murder.

>Nah that's good if the books are degenerate filth (which they were)
Destroying a book is always wrong. I think Hitler is the single greatest monster in human history. But Mein Kampf still needs to be preserved as it's a part of human history. Nazi book burning was inherently anti human behavior and is indicative of a mindset that wanted to destroy human civilization.

The post ww2 propaganda was that the Nazis were a strong state that was barely stopped. In reality it was a failed state sustained by loot and plunder that only lasted as long as it did because France was in worse shape and neither the UK or the USSR was ready for total war.

>>712804478
>6 million

Did the jews have access to dlss way back then?

>>712785342
>almost
I'm not sure I'd add even that caveat in some cases, like that one fuckstick who said he was just doing what he was doing so Musk would get mad, regardless of it was good for the game or not.

>>712790239
Farming and livestock become neccesary past certain population numbers. Hunting alone can barely sustain medium-sized migratory groups.
Unless you're ok with hunting and eating other humans, but hey, whatever floats for you.

>>712783730
>You see, real feminism has never been tried before.

>>712804376
>I would if white was a actual real group that existed.
>It's not
>White is at best a made up lie
No more questions, your grace

>just
I can prove it wrong because what you wrote is an incomplete, one-dimensional definition. it's should also reference tokenism and marxist shitty writing.

>>712805036
That's a historical fact

>>712803770
fiction doesn't care about your "real life"

>>712804035
>How is having food that tastes worse on purpose bad?

>>712804376
you are fucking racist, retard

>>712811353
Fiction should be informed by real life to some degree, and sometimes try to inform real life in return*
* - not for the worse like they do with wokeshit, uglification and shitty remakes though, obviously

>>712811436
>food analogy

>>712812371
Too precise for you?
>>712811638
Fiction should be ideal. Nobody wants ugliness or plainness on screen.
Deal with it

>>712784045
It's when you see a fag whining that a woman is hot, and you wonder what it has to do with equality, but the nu-feminist is convinced it does and hot womyn are evil. Clearly, as a true feminist you want hot womyn in game, and advocate for it, but the fake gay nu-feminist is saying the opposite and therefore a pretender.

>>712813895
>hot womyn are evil.
you forgot "unrealistic"
They say that shit even in front of pictures of hot women who actuall exist

>>712783424
fibbity bippity