>>714457802
>so some american nobody says "there are no laws about this" and uses it as a debunk of "we want laws about this"
You've got some pretty shitty reading comprehension if that's your interpretation of what he said, considering he said literally the opposite multiple times in that blog.
>after it has expired, in which case you need to remove or acquire a new license for that IP
And thus illegal to continue using that IP if the changes aren't made. Congratulations on repeating what was said in different words.
>it demands an expectation of durability for something that is functionally sold as a good
And thus asking the government to legislate and regulate how games are made. Man, your reading comprehension really does suck ass.
> i know for a fact that every single pussy ass publisher is going to kneel and deal with it
You don't know shit, then. They'll fight tooth and nail to be able to continue to not spend money on shit they don't want to spend money on. Kind of the whole purpose of SKG is to force the support til something is functionally standalone, yeah?
>cry about it
Sure thing, Internet Tough Guy. Wanna meet in the parking lot and settle this after work? Also, the page isn't mine, I was just sharing someone else's perspective on the whole thing.
>no one is asking for indefinite service
>no one is asking for the games to be playable forever, even when they were online games to begin with
>he thinks online games just function without servers to keep them running
>he thinks running servers is free or cheap
Ah, you also lack the ability to think deeper than surface level.
>EULA isn't law and can't actually be enforced
I 100% agree with that and always have.
>terminally online moron deflection calling something AI because too lazy to read and think
