>>712879508
I wouldn't call it anything at all. Can't we just let something simply be, without autistically categorizing it? It's a style with a certain je ne sais quoi, and you cheapen its organic authenticity by forcibly giving it a name 20 years after the fact.
Furthermore, you also open it up to corporate exploitation. Take for example the picture here
>>712821273. To you and me this communicates a specific style, je ne sais quoi, period of time. But an out of touch corpo marketing nigger sees a picture like that and has no idea what to make of it on its own. But then, if you start captioning that picture and others like it with "FrUtIgEr AeRo", then suddenly the corpo marketing nigger has a starting point from which to exploit and pander and corrupt. I don't want that.
