>>713126886>Main things I don't know about either one is which one is longer (i.e. more content) and what's less irritating about DLC (the less paid small DLC the better, expansions are fine).3 houses is significantly longer than engage, even before considering multiple playthroughs being sorta viable through the different houses.
Both have a season pass full of shit tier dlc, and one "expansion" tier side story.
3 Houses' is meh, skippable, Engage's is unironically one of the most disgraceful pieces of software you will ever purchase.
Honestly, both are better without buying the dlc, because the dlc gives you a bunch of op shit that upsets the balance of the game.
The plot for 3 houses is palatable if bleh, Engage I genuinely would advise skipping the cutscenes, they actively bring the experience down, they are that bad.
If the rings in Engage sound like a bad fit for for you, avoid. They ARE the core mechanic of the game, full stop, and the rings often actually matter more than who they are equipped to.
Engage flows a bit more like a traditional FE game, while 3 Houses is a bit more its own thing, in case that matters to you.
I would reccomend 3 Houses over Engage in general, but, with the considerations you're making, I'd say almost full stop, Engage will probably just annoy you. Unless 3 Houses really looks that bad, I guess, but, I've never been someone who felt really compelled one way or another by the way a game looks, so can't comment on that.