Yikes

how does it compare to a 3ds screen

who actually cares? what, you need super fast reactions for mario kart? you can just plug it into a gaming monitor if you need an uber fast display anyway

I thought something felt off with mine

>>713665494 (OP)
Well obviously, its a portable console
This is why it has a docked mode where you can connect it to any screen, duh

Dock it.

>>713665567
>>713665683
>>713665693
the tendie cope
>its okay if it has an awful screen worse than a tv

They know it's like this, they did it so they can upsell millions of people a revision withva proper OLED in a couple of years

>>713665792
>worse than a tv
Ok. Can you bring your tv on public transporty? No? So shut the fuck up and dock it.

>>713666138
You can, but some nigger would stab you and take it.

>>713666240
well...you're not wrong there

>>713665494 (OP)
Buy the oled model again next year, tendies

>>713666138
that's the problem
I can't bring my tv
I can't bring my monitor
I have to bring a dogshit screen worse than switch 1 because they made an awful screen.

wtf is your argument?

>>713665567
>>713665683
>>713665693
So portability matters until it doesn’t, just like OLED mattered until it didn’t.

>>713665494 (OP)
120hz ain't bad for a goy tablet, it's better than the troonix goydeck.

>>713669380
You‘re a retarded ape who can‘t think beyond refresh rates and resolutions

>>713669639
I just said it's not bad for a goy tablet, you troonix faggot.

>>713665494 (OP)
Pure FUD. The screen looks and feels 10x better than the switch 1 screen.

>>713666996
OLED never mattered fag

>>713665683
Its slower than the switch 1 screen

The screen has marginally faster pixel response times than the PSP1000, which was so ghosty that games used a trick where they would move the camera back and forth by one pixel to simulate anti-aliasing.

>>713665494 (OP)
Works on my machine. Never noticed a single issue and games run at smooth 60fps. And I'm not some mongoloid console only gamer, I play games at 120fps on PC regularly.

>>713670046
>I'm not some mongoloid
Clearly you are since you‘re talking about framerates when that‘s completely irrelevant in this context

>"testing" says 60hz
>switch 2 display is 120hz
Mmmmm

>>713665567
>what, you need super fast reactions for mario kart?
yes. mario kart has more inputs than modern fighting games

>>713670253
But if the framerate is smooth and I'm seeing zero ghosting or artifacts then what are we even talking about? It's like calling a millionaire broke because billionaires exist. The screen literally looks good and is way better than the switch 1 screen. Some digital foundry chart is irrelevant because whatever the issue is it is not perceivable.

>ITT paralysis my analysis
dont care comfy switch 2 for 8 years incoming.

>>713669801
coooooope

>>713666952
My argument is nintendo is my best friend and the idol I worship.

>>713665494 (OP)
Do they mean 1/10 as fast?

>>713665494 (OP)
How much slower is it than an iPad?

>>713670439
We're talking about the fact that you drive a car with a turbocharged 4 Cylinder when V8 Hellcats exist, you poorfag.

>>713665494 (OP)
i actually got mindfucked, nah the response of the screen is instantaneous.

>>713665494 (OP)
Nintendo is probably well aware of this and knows it doesn't matter because you retards will buy it anyway

>>713669801
It did, and you will say it matters again when they announce the 2 OLED.

>>713670439
You're not a reliable source as you would excuse 30fps as "just fine". You aren't aware of what the discussion is about. You aren't aware of what the feel of a modern system is. You are the poster child of a peon who walked into a room and began trying to argue with people over a topic he couldn't even fathom.

You've already demonstrated you don't even understand the topic, so nothing you say has any relevance—taking tech talking points from a guy who replies to discussions about slow draw times with "I have 60fps though" is the last thing anyone would do. Your continued involvement makes you a laughing stock.

>>713665494 (OP)
Is that a fucking mouse? How come they didn't have this idea the first time?

>>713672332
>You're not a reliable source
>They found the Switch 2 returned an average pixel response time of 33 ms at 60 Hz
>PC Gamer

That's analogue tier of response, it's extremely fucking fast. To put into perspective:

The SNES has 50ms of delay.

The PS5 controller has a response of 80-120ms

Why are they trying to grift the switch 2 like this? Maybe Jeremy Laird from PCGamer is under someone's pocket? seems likely since most review sites are going under. Hey buy an ad

>>713672838
>>713672838
please reply Jeremy
>>713672332
>>713672332

>we used thousands of dollars of equipment to perform a multi day analysis which confirmed that some numbers are slightly smaller than other numbers

>>713671976
NOPE. ill be laughing at everyone playing the OLED tax.

>>713665494 (OP)
>hype up the screen as some huge improvement
>no oled
>fake hdr
>somehow bttom of the barrel latency and ghosting
There's always a catch or three.

>>713665494 (OP)
This shit again? How many threads we had today? Four?

>>713665494 (OP)
Look, I know some anons are whining about the Switch 2’s LCD refresh rate being a bit on the slow side, but come on, it’s a handheld console, not a PC gaming rig. The colors are vibrant, battery life is solid, and the screen’s perfect for chilling with Mario or Zelda on the go.

Plus, that LCD tech keeps costs down, meaning more games and accessories instead of overpriced specs. Who needs 120Hz when you’re couch co-oping with friends or flying through Hyrule? Sometimes slow and steady wins the race, and let’s be honest, that buttery Nintendo gameplay smooths over a lot.

So yeah, the screen isn’t a speed demon, but it’s exactly what the Switch 2 needs to keep delivering those classic Nintendo vibes. Just sayin’.

>>713665567
>>713665532
>>713665494 (OP)
>According to independent testing

Why aren't you posting the results, OP?

>>713665494 (OP)
These are certainly numbers, but do they mean anything to anyone who isn't seeking comparisons? Like if Joe Schmoe turned on his Switch 2 and played it in handheld mode, would it even register to him?

>>713666996
>>713666952
>>713666334
>>713666103
>>713669801
>>713671976
Look at the sales of Switch OLED. Nobody fucking bought it because only genuine faggots care about that. This isn't like IPS vs TN 3DS days.

>>713674626
this must be bait

>>713674796
b8? Nah, just someone who actually plays the thing instead of armchair tech experts whining about specs. Maybe if you spent less time complaining and more time enjoying the games, you’d get it. But hey, keep screaming “b8” while missing out on the fun. Your call.

>>713674757
easiest way to think about it is that the numbers are worst out of any screen made for gamers in decades and that it should be technically easy to fix it via overdrive, and nintendo is being very odd releasing this product as is

Yes many joes will go onto claim the display is best and works fine and so on, but those same people would feel the benefit if nintendo wasnt being a freak about it.

>>713674890
Nah, I think you’re blowing it way out of proportion. It's a handheld Nintendo console, not an esports monitor. The Switch 2 isn't trying to compete with 240Hz OLEDs, it's trying to deliver solid gameplay, battery life, and affordability in a hybrid system.

Yeah, the screen might not be cutting-edge, but it's far from “worst in decades.” People said the same thing about the OG Switch and guess what? It sold like crack at a middle school. Most players aren’t gonna notice or care — they just want to play Mario and Pokémon without it looking like a flip phone.

Nintendo knows their audience, and frankly, the “overdrive” fix crowd is acting like they’re buying a $2K rig instead of a toy for playing Zelda on the bus.

Touch grass.

>>713675167
>, but it's far from “worst in decades
pixel response wise it is.

The normal ips today would be <10 ms using conservative overdrive, not 33 of switch 2. It causes a lot of ghost images as the screen tries to change at 60hz but the pixels are only fast enough for 30hz.
Switch 1 was 20 ish ms and wasn't great experience to begin with.

the psp 1000 from 2004 had better response time.

wow FAKE NEWS i can legally inundate all THAT as much as i want as leader of Nintendo

>>713665494 (OP)
nintenxisters... our response?

>>713665494 (OP)
>he boughted day 1
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>360p resolution
>33 ms response time
it's over

>unlikely to be an early miracle hack like there was with switch 1
>using a brand new custom gpu architecture, so no piggybacking off of known tegra specs and existing 3ds emulators which use a similar but not identical tegra chip
>significant difference in power, making it far more difficult to brute force through emulator flaws
>90% of the current crop of "programmers" are retarded tranny zoomers who have to ask ai to do things for them
>the few competent people left are likely spooked after what happened with yuzu/ryujinx
>even if an emulator starts making traction, retarded zoomers will literally tag nintendo in posts about it as some sort of "own", causing it to be shut down before it winds up in an acceptable state
Switch 2 emulation is fucked

>>713665494 (OP)
Why are the Japanese so cheap now making low quality goods?

>"you are gonna HATE the switch 2 because it won't be nearly as powerful as the steam deck!"
>blows it out of the water in every meaningful metric
>"uuhhh... the joycon connectors are gonna snap! GOTCHA!!"
>they don't
>"you HAVE to feel bad now!! the... uhh... pixels are slower at 60hz!!!"

>>713677521
>Due to Wayland forcing VSync, the Deck has 2 screen refreshes of unavoidable latency - ~33.3ms at 60hz to ~50ms at 40hz

Something tells me that's how fast 90% of LCD screens are able to display pixels.

>>713672838
>The PS5 controller has a response of 80-120ms
DS4 and DS5 are some of the fastest controllers you can get for PC with 1 ms input lag and that's wireless

>>713677862
why would i care about this when my reaction time is 200ms on a good day

>>713677924
So that your final reaction is 201 ms instead of 320 ms

>>713678003
literally unnoticeable difference

>>713665494 (OP)
Looks fine to me. Only issue is dark screens are dark blue as with all LCDs instead of black like with OLEDs. Maybe we have a 3DS situation with different displays, but it's probably another YouTube grifter needs clicks episode.

>>713665532
It compares to the cheapest POS LCD of around the timeframe the 3DS launched

>>713678112
I can't even play shooters on mouse with v-sync on because of the input lag

>*proceeds playing games on Deck with 3x fake frames and 100ms lag*

>>713678393
good thing we are talking about joysticks then

>>713674776
No one bought it because everyone and their grandma owned a switch already. It also released the year after Covid when the free government bucks ended and people were forced back to work.
An oled switch 2 will do about the same in sales, but it costs Nintendo nothing to produce these things well after the fact in small quantities to get a boost in switch 2 sales in a few years. Their goal isn’t to sell tens of millions with oled versions, anon. Stop coping and admit people do care about oled and the switch 2 should have launched with it but Nintendo faggots will eat whatever shit they’re served.

>>713665494 (OP)
How does Nintendo, time and time AGAIN, find these absolutely rubbish bargain bin aliexpress parts for their consoles?

>all this crying about something that could easily be fixed through a firmware update

>>713677862
how come the ps5 has 100+ ms of delay then? Is the machine faulty?

>>713665494 (OP)
They're trying so hard to FUD this shit. People fell for the fud with Wii U but I don't think it's working now. Even the picture they used there just makes Switch 2 look really cool and fun

>>713666996
> just like OLED mattered until it didn’t.
That's where your wrong. OLED matters, it matters a lot actually. It's the entire reason Nintendo will be releasing a Switch 2 OLED as mid-gen refresh. Nintendo knows that a good amount of people will double dip and buy the OLED once it's available and there surely some people waiting for an OLED model to buy a Switch 2.

>>713678786
How does Sony after 30 years still have no in-house first party games. You'd think they might invest in some software R&D? All they seem to be capable of doing is buying studios like Bungie and then every game Bungie made since was pure ass

>>713673779
its the new tax we’re on about

>>713665494 (OP)
Nintendo could shit in a box, call it the switcheroo 3 and people would be on it like flies. People don't deserve good games because they are shitheads lacking in taste that will buy the newest slop like a pavlov dog trained to salivate on a bell ring.

>>713665567
>who actually cares? what, you need mario kart?
no

>>713674776

>oled
what about new switch? everyone keeps banging on about the old one

Most tendies are too fucking stupid to even understand the difference between input lag and pixel response time, so I think Nintendo made exactly the right product for the right audience.

>>713679308
the average eye can see 250 fps, but the typical nintendo brain only lets some process 33ms of that

>>713679308
Last time I asked you what response time actually affected and you couldn't even give me answer lmao

>>713679224
So why did the wiiU flop?

>>713672838
I’m under(in) the pocket of nobody, thanks,

>>713679413
This is what it affects, dumbass. There should be 1 frame visible of the game at any time. Instead you get fucking FIVE smeared ghosty frames on each other.
>it's free motion blur!

>>713679451
Because of jewish owned gaming press trying to FUD kino exactly like the OP's post
Anyone who owned a Wii U knows it has some of the best games and the best console design in general

>>713679591
>cameras pick up LCD screens the same as my eyes

>>713679308
>input lag and pixel response time
the entire monitor industry has been poisoned by this misconception which is why all gamer monitors advertise 1ms response times

>>713679621
That doesn’t explain why it flopped

According to you, tendies should buy anything nintendo makes, yet they didnt

>>713679308
Let's not kid ourselves, you'll be buying a Switch 2 in a few years when you realize it's the only platform that has any games

>>713678940
Basically Sony's OS, yeah. The reason Bloodborne runs at infamously bad framepacing was not to use PS4's built in 30 fps cap, since it significantly increases input lag.

If you have hacked PS4, there's a patch for Bloodborne to use syscall that forces 30 fps cap on game, which actually makes it look smooth to play (for 30 fps) but the input lag is too much.

>>713679670
It's from a 240 FPS video, it's objectively representative, holy SHIT you're so fucking STUPID

>>713679719
Yes it does faggot. I still remember when IGN.com convinced all you dipshits that Star Fox Zero was a bad game. It's like a 9 at worst, a really good game actually. Definitely better than most PS4 slop they were telling you to buy. You really are some gullible morons.

>>713679750
He's mentally ill, he probably has 2 of them already

>>713679803
are you a bot? What does star fox zero have to do with anything?

>I-IT'S FINE YOU PATHETIC LOSERS.... THE HUMAN EYE CAN'T SEE BLUR ANYWAY..... I'M LITERALLY NOT SEEING ANY PROBLEMS ON MINE.... HA-HAAA.....

>>713679942
Nobodys seeing the problem except for this one tester who’s slowing it down 500% of its normal speed

>>713670439
>Press a button
>Wait
>Wait longer
>Action finally happens on screen
>This is fine as long as it's smooth
You're a retard, huh?

>>713678832
And you know that for a fact how? Did you design and manufacture the screen?

>>713679991
I have one and I immediately noticed it's blurry as shit. I still play on it but it's very disappointing.

>>713680080
Post your switch then

>>713680053
Yes.

>>713665494 (OP)
I'm still buying Donkey Kong Bananza

screen looks amazing that guy is smoking ps5 overheating fumes

>>713665494 (OP)
i just connect the dock to my PC monitor

>>713680162

Yeah, it's one thing to say "that's true but it doesn't really bother me" but defending the choice to use that bottom of the barrel screen, espcially after they specifically marketed Switch 2 as having peak turbo fast peak lcd with vrr, hdr and other buzzwords, is just sad.
Don't have S2 since I don't care about mario kart that much, I'll just wait for the inevitable OLED at this point.
Have a photo of my physical Switch games btw, before someone calls me a snoy.

>x times slower
what's the unit of measurement for slowness?

>>713680759
Milliseconds you dumb fuck

>>713680453
the screen is nice and big, but yeah, should wait for the OLED release

>>713680857
so what is 10ms but "ten times slower"? ten times 10 is 100 but slower implies negative so -90?

>>713681071
>slower implies negative
tendies.

it's weird Nintendo markets the Switch 2 screen as 120Hz but every game is locked at 60Hz. you can only do 120Hz when you dock it and plug it to external screen... fake marketing?

>>713680453
Not seeing any ghosting here

>>713681131
you are esl in addition of being a poor eric bootlicker?

>>713681263
>no ghosting on a static screen
wowwwwww

>>713681228
That's a camera motion capture. Cameras see more blur than human eyes so this is basically a lie.

>>713674776
the gap between oled + base switch and ips vs TN 3ds is not even remotely comparable. oled fucking mogs lcd

>>713681574
Only bad cameras

>>713681228
So far only one game supports 120 fps on Switch 2, and it's a demo...

This is now a sony hate thread.
Post any and all screen caps of sony getting btfo from their hubris or greed.
Don't feed the nigger faggot who makes these bait threads every hour.

>>713679224
>with 4k
doesnt world only do 2k?

>>713671976
I never bought the oled, just the larger batter switch.
OLED is a meme to scam retards much like 4k.

>>713665494 (OP)

>>713665494 (OP)
>overpriced
>$80 games
>keycards
>can brick at any time
>only major game just patched the one RNG mode keeping it alive
>now this

Man, DK Bananza better be worth it.

>>713682379
Switch 2 is already the best selling video game system of all time and Donkey Kong looks like GOTY. And we still have Metorid Prime 4.

What's happening on PS5 and Xbox?

>>713680453
updog the brightness or downdog the natural light

>>713682476
Pekora

>>713682541
What the fuck are you even talking about? Nobody is discussing display brightness in this thread.

>>713682639
Someones malding

>>713682476
Doesn't matter to me personally, quality-wise it's off to a very bad start. Especially what they did to MK8; way to kill your game unless if they're planning on bringing back traditional 3-lap races in an emergency free update.

>>713682359
dude, that's PSP 1000 tier display

>>713682359
Kek'd OP BTFO

>>713682693
Sure what ever helps you cope

>>713682476
This have anything to do with what the other guy said.
Wouldn't be the first or the last time a poor product sells well.

Seriously, how the fuck did they manage to find IPS that is slower than bad VA display?

Response time is the main benefit of IPS. They could get generic VA display and at least it would have much deeper black colors.

>>713682948
only guess is lack of overdrive mode because it takes more energy and sw2 battery is 50% of the size of steam decks

I honestly cannot trust youtube videos when it comes to hardware anymore. The fact that every channel doing this shit relies so heavily on view count really makes me wonder if it's all just bait.
If it IS an issue, that's fine, but these channels know that fanboys will click on every video to try and denounce what they're saying, so it's easy to get those views.
I would need to test one in real life to see before i believe any of these D and C tier channels.

>>713665494 (OP)
>LCD screen attached to a budget gaming experience under $500 powering itself off a 25watts is less impressive than $400 gaming monitor hooked up to $1000 rig that powers itself on x10 to x20 the wattage amount.

I think people are missing the plot here.

>>713672838
It's the SCREEN RESPONSE TIME not INPUT DELAY you fucking illiterate
You don't fucking know what you're even talking about yet your impulse is to immediately cover for your owners

>>713683272
Seething schizos need something to shitpost about.

eh, doesn't bother me enough.
Just gonna get one later for the holiday season when a few more games are out

>dedicated CRT user for the last 12 years
>branch out and get a steamdeck oled
>selling because of how bad motion clarity is on it

>>713683375
motion clarity on LEDs only gets good at like 200hz+

>>713665494 (OP)
seeing anyone using the joycon as a mouse reminds of when they wanted us to use the Wiimote as things like a microphone or ball

>>713682681
18+ website, kiddo

>>713683546
how would anyone get those numbers on a 4k tv?
i guess just frame generation...

>>713682772
Switch 2 there is literally running a different piece of software with different (improved) graphics
Are you seriously implying the Switch 2 LCD has superior colour reproduction to OLED?
>Nintendo invented the world's first LCD that's better than an OLED
Your retardation is made all the more funny by the fact that it's a terrible LCD.

>>713683790
depends on the game innit

>>713665494 (OP)
10 times slower than a gaming monitor... how does it compare to my old ips monitor play games on but bought mainly for art?

>>713684193
>how does it compare to my old ips monitor play games on but bought mainly for art?
Your display is most likely better.
Switch 2's display is comparable to the first model of PSP when it comes to response times.

>>713683810
>what is HDR?

>>713684389
Top is literally reflecting more light you dumb little drone

>>713684389
Something that the Switch 2 display doesn't support. And in your screenshot, the OLED is set to Standard mode, but the Switch 2 screen is permanently set to the equivalent of the Vivid mode setting of the OLED Switch. You have to set the OLED to Vivid mode and then compare.

>>713684353
yeah i checked and it's 6ms.

I'm waiting for the OoT remake, and even then I probably still won't buy it since there's a very high chance nu-era Nintendo will catastrophically fuck it up.

>>713684798
>Something that the Switch 2 display doesn't support. And in your screenshot, the OLED is set to Standard mode, but the Switch 2 screen is permanently set to the equivalent of the Vivid mode setting of the OLED Switch. You have to set the OLED to Vivid mode and then compare.

Actual schzio gibberish. Switch 2's screen supports HDR10 and there is no such fucking thing as a "Vivid" option for OLED Switch.

Fucking rope yourself lmao

>>713665567
>screen is bad for videogames
>WHO CARES

lol

>>713665567
>you can just plug it into a gaming monitor if you need an uber fast display anyway

it doesn't support variable refresh rate unless you're in portable mode anon

>>713686218
>it doesn't support variable refresh rate unless you're in portable mode

Yet. Probably something they'll add with a firmware update.

>>713686301
hopefully sums up why its stupid to buy a console at release when you have to wait for basic features

>pay current gen console and game prices for previous gen performance
>it's a handheld you can't compare them!
>screen and battery life are garbage
>who even uses it handheld, just keep it docked!

>>713685863
>and there is no such fucking thing as a "Vivid" option for OLED Switch.
LMAO YOU FUUUUCKING RETAAAAARD

>>713685863
Switch 2 screen supports DISPLAYING an HDR10 signal, downsampled to its 8 bit SDR panel
Nintendo lied through their teeth and you believe it, holy lmao

>>713686218
Why the fuck do you need variable refresh rate you retard? That sounds horrible. You Sonyfags are mentally ill

>>713686439
Well shit, mine has been set Vivid as default for years.

Image quality still stands. >>713682772

>>713686509
See >>713682772

And

>>713684389

>>713686656
>Image quality still stands
It doesn't because like I already said you are running two different games. The Switch 2 version has revamped graphics. You have to compare like with like.

>>713665494 (OP)
The perfect Switch 2 will eventually be released. Remember to buy all versions in between in the mean time.

>>713686707
On the second picture literally the only difference is that the OLED has bad reflection on the glass because of the oblique angle. Do you REALLY THINK AN LCD CAN HAVE BETTER COLORS THAN AN OLED? LMAO YOU ARE FUCKING DELUSIONAL BOY

>>713686718
>You have to compare like with like.

I did.
>>713684389

>>713686591
>Why the fuck do you need variable refresh rate you retard
so the games feels smoother and makes use out of your 120hz+ screen? you should ask nintendo themselves since the switch 2 supports it in handheld mode
>You Sonyfags are mentally ill
I don't even have a PS5 but okay faggot

>>713686786
See >>713686765

>>713686765
>what is HDR?

Seethe moar

>>713681852
This is the power of nokia.. I'm impressed

>>713686830
Do you... Do you think a game boy emulator has HDR support? You surely can't be this fucking brain-dead, right? Anon? And also just completely ignoring the massive reflection on the OLED one? Please anon tell me you're not actually this fucking stupid?

This is a good thread. So much cope from tendies, it's unreal. Grow the fuck up.

>>713685952
It's unbelievable how much shit people are willing to eat just because it has a specific brand on it.

This is a good thread. So much cope from snoys, it's unreal. Grow the fuck up.

>>713686890
>Do you think a game boy emulator has HDR support?
not reading post chain
i'm gonna boot up my mister which goes to my retrotink 4k and inject hdr into it right now because of this

>>713686890
The reflection is on both. Does the picture quality in ambient light not count? Am I supposed to play my Switch understand a blanket?

>>713686830
DELETE THIS

>>713687109
Reflection is not the same on both retard, I have to assume you are a bad faith troll at this point, and the reflection on the OLED one is bad only because it's at a much more oblique angle in the photo. You're either really a 20 IQ retard or just trolling, don't expect more responses from me. Fucking fag.

>>713682359

>thread about display ghosting
>only like two people actually know what it is
One of these is pure, the other one has about 2 frames of motion blur applied (with a decay of 0.67 to bias it towards the fresher frame). I think this is a suitable demonstration of pixel ghosting.
Whether or not this is a nothing burger or if it's the end of the world is ultimately up to you to decide.
Higher quality version that's about 9MB: https://litter.catbox.moe/hvz27m8fxntogys7.webm

Holy fuck,you can power a nuclear power plant using the copium in this thread

>>713687523
Tendieism is a cult

>>713687227
You literally can't see the difference unless you extremely focus on the background lol

>>713687523
Agreed. Snoys are at Chernobyl levels of desperation now.

>>713687864
>Don't focus on the background in a racing game
Retard

>>713687523
You literally can't see the difference unless you extremely focus on the background lol

>>713687227
Top looks clean
bottom looks like a blurry mess holy shit. Reminds me of TAA

is the screen on the Switch 2 really that bad?

>>713688135
You literally can't see a difference unless you pause the video and go slow motion shit frame by frame
Snoys are desperate

Nintendo has always had dogshit screens. I remember when half the DS touch screens had a deep piss coloration and dead pixels were common. Cheap bastards.

>>713665567
Normally I'd agree since le 0.00001 millisecond frame drop is fucking nothing, but for the price Nintendo charges for a Switch 2 it's an expectation that you're buying a premium product, not something worse than a $150 gaming monitor.

Nintendo has always had dogshit screens. I remember when the first Gameboy screens had a deep piss coloration and dead pixels were common. Cheap bastards.

>>713671881
>>713672332
>>713680001
I routinely game on a 144hz monitor hooked up to a 4090. The Switch 2 screen looks good for a handheld system. Better than my steam deck. Seethe and cope.

>>713676527
The original PS Vita from 2012 had an OLED screen. Nintendo is embarrassing.

>>713674435
Oled is a negative on a handheld, not a positive.

>>713679719
>why isnt the state of the world the same as it was in 2013?
Kill yourself, dipshit.

>>713671881
>poorfag
But I thought Switch 2 was only a system richfags could afford? Which is it?

>>713688575
Just because you have a distorted idea of what is okay for a handheld doesn't make it not dogshit.

I love how "PSP 1000" is a term that literally no one has ever heard of in their life yet it's been posted ITT 20 times. Totally organic lmao.

>>713688849
How do I have a distorted idea when I also own a Steam Deck and am routinely exposed to top tier visuals on my PC?

>>713688869
Just because you're underage doesn't mean everyone else is.

>>713688181
nigga the blur is very noticeable
Are you watching the video from a 60hz iPhone or something?

>>713688869
this isn't even a zoomer, it's a fetus at this point

>>713688905
I'm 32. Ad hom. Try again next thread.

>>713688903
The Steam Deck LCD is also famously horrible dogshit. The Switch 2 has measurably worse pixel response times than the fucking Switch 1. How's that for a relevant comparison?

>>713687227
The bottom here looks like absolute shit but the switch 2 screen looks like the top, not the bottom.

Reminder that nobody was complaining about this until YouTube videos pointed it out and all of a sudden people are experts on panels.

>>713689098
Lol no I own one and it really looks like the bottom.

>>713689196
Post pic with Switch 2 and timestamp and the message "Switch 2 screen looks like shit", otherwise you're full of shit.

>>713689281
Already done nigger >>713680453

Sick of this shit.

>>713688920
>nigga the blur is very noticeable

Nobody has said jack shit about it for months hmmmmm.....

>>713689401
>for months
The fucking thing was released 3 weeks ago dumbass

>>713689328
>Post number in the pic doesn't even match the reply post
Holy fucking cope. You guys are actually losing it.

>>713689339
It's obviously paid click bait. Competition is desperate.

>>713689465
I accidentally eyeballed one post lower, that still proves it was me and not a random Google image
You're still BTFO though

>>713689451
and nobody said anything

post a thread from the archive about this issue from before this "analysis" was made, go on

>>713669380
>>713669720
>>713677521
>>713678486
>not a single mention of the steam deck in OP
>still seething
yikes

>>713689451
People have had hands on for months. You're desperately clinging to a microscopic nothingness unnoticeable to the naked eye.

The cope is hysterical.

>>713689678
I'm BTFO yet you're so mad you can't even look at your monitor correctly? lmao

>>713688324
>worse than a $150 gaming monitor.

Remember that the Switch is not only a screen but comes with a whole portable console included. Of course it will be more expensive that just a monitor

>>713689930
it's honestly so fucking dumb. I even went back to look at the damn thing since I play mostly in docked mode and I genuinely cannot see the problem.

I guess I won't be able to play my games in portable mode with binoculars and a 100x slow motion camera, damn...

>>713689995
Is this supposed to be an argument for the Switch 2 having a good screen? Not convinced.

>>713689883
Should I get one just to play older stuff? I doubt Valve will make a Deck 2 simply because the idea already took hold and now all of these devices are going to use SteamOS anyhow.

>>713690079
You would never notice it. It's 0.0001 thousandth of a second. You would have to record footage, slow it down and zoom in to see anything.

But Nintendo hating schizos are beyond mindbroken at this point. Donkey Kong looms on the horizon and the panic is real.

>>713689930
Digital Foundry really dropped the ball with their hands on, they shouldn't have sent blind 60yo retard Richard. They walked back all of those claims you posted and proved with objective measurements that the response time is terrible and HDR is nonexistent. You are a coping paypig retard.

>>713690236
>>713690079
Hello is this the hugbox for idiot Nintendo paycucks?

Reminder that we went from "720,000 pre-orders, panic behind the scenes" to this.

>>713690242
most times when companies gives "hands on" experience to people it's usually the prototype deluxe model they show to everyone, not the model they will ship to store shelves. what they showed to journos back then was probably the oled version and tricked everyone

>>713690079
Same.
Only if I put it side by side with the OLED I see a difference in colour depth and if response time is worse I've yet to notice it.

>>713690242
>the response time is terrible and HDR is nonexistent

Is lying just a coping mechanism?

>>713689339
This clickbait is literally an indication that the Switch 2 is
1) on everyone's mind
2) a greatly desired consumer electronic
3) going to succeed
it's literally kvetching over the negatives of a console basically everyone likes but nobody wants to admit publicly because shitting on the family friendly, overly litigious megacorp is more fashionable than admitting that while you think it's fucked up, you don't give enough of a shit to really boycott it.
It happens all the time in gacha. ZZZ was doomposted to hell and rose out of the ashes in cultural relevance and raw numbers despite being the least accessible of the popular ones. People bitch LOUDLY about stuff they like

>>713690432
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA EVERYONE LAFF AT THIS STUPID ASS. LOOK AT THIS COPE HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>713689930
>pic
So here's the actual experience the average person not obsessed with reductionistic thinking about tech will have.

>>713690079
>>713690236
I have a Switch 2, and you definitely notice it for 2D games. It's literally about 1 frame of ghosting, and it's consistent.
It's bad but nothing a firmware update can't fix. It's also the type of thing you forget about after 5 minutes of getting used to it.

>>713690458
Both of those things are objective and you can watch the DF analysis to check for yourself.

Damn Nintendo shills really are in panic mode here, calling all measurements from Digital Foundry, Monitor Unboxed, chimolog, and Taki Udon lies.

>>713690616
This DF analysis?

>>713690616
Numbers on a paper
>>713689930
vs what people actually experience

>>713690749
You forgot to quote the relevant part bro let me help

>>713690715
It's not a lie, I'm just saying that nobody gave a fuck until people pointed it out so obviously it's not that big of a deal when using the system kek

>>713690575
I'll have to try it with mario wonder to see if can see it, I mostly played mario kart

>>713690838
It's like having a bunch of dead pixels in the corner. Does it make it impossible to enjoy games? No. Is it very fucking distracting and impossible to unsee once you've noticed it? You bet.

>>713690917
most people complaining about it will never ever see the issue because they don't own the console

>>713690835
Sorry bro, but how does this effect the overall opinion of the system?

I will post it again for you.

>>713690007
Feels like cope. Even the PSVita has a better screen and was a third of the price.

>>713691060
>bro how does a dogshit screen hamper your ability to enjoy the system?

>>713691098
Kek yeah go play your PSA Vita lma0o

>>713690917
People really won't give a fuck it's a bunch of sperging tech nerds. The average player have their shit hooked up to a dogshit TV or monitor with post-processing crap that's doing worse things to image quality (plus input lag). I don't really think most people will care about the screen outside of some youtubers farming clicks.

>>713690575
Just tried The Dominus Collection and that looked fine.
Might be because it's lower resolution idk.

>>713691151
Alright.

>>713691150
Meanwhile....

>>713690715
This same chart was posted yesterday with Switch 2 at 30 ms

>>713691383
No, that was Hardware Unboxed's chart. They measured 33ms. I was actually being charitable not posting that one (which I think is inaccurate)

Maybe waiting for a hardware revision wouldn't hurt.

When the FUD switches to joycon magnets or some other dumb shit next week it's going to be legendary. Do you guys actually think you're being subtle or convincing anyone? Your shit can be smelled from a mile away. Your argument style reminds me of troons.

>>713691370
A static screen of a game boy emulator is completely irrelevant to either pixel response or lack of HDR.

>>713691554
already done

Why can't tendies just say "yeah the HDR and the motion response are kinda bad but other factors make up for it" instead of being unhinged retards trying to deny objective reality?

>>713691565
Holy cope. Post more cartoons and graphs lmao

>>713691823
You're not very smart are you?

Nintendo should just release a console without its gimmick, like 2DS to 3DS. It should be a small box that you connect to you TV and a regular controller, and the name shall be SWITCHED

>>713691904
You're seething. We get it.

Ya think that Switch 2 emulator will be up and running in time for Donkey Kong?

>>713691993
Do you have some mental condition that only lets you post irrelevant content?

>>713690242
rich has been in the industry too long and has the old media mentality of being a hypeman/partner as much as a critic. always funny to see him sweat when his guys start dumping on nvidia or whatever. pretty sure he even stanned for stadia

>>713690232
Steam Deck is the best UMPC for playing old shit, becuase you have the built-in Steam Controller 2.0 which allows you to map inputs to the trackpads, making keyboard heavy games playable without the keyboard.

>>713692084
>always funny to see him sweat when his guys start dumping on nvidia or whatever.
lol, yes, he's sweating bullets when that happens

>>713665494 (OP)
what is a typical gaming monitor in 2025? 160hz 1ms?

>>713692182
3.3ms if we actually take the 10x value, which is a decently fast monitor

>>713692081
Post more cartoons and graphs to help yourself cope

>>713692328
Why did you post a picture of yourself?

Did snoys really sit through a 2 HOUR Switch 2 hardware review (entitled Switch 2 - A Satisfying Upgrade) to find the one minor nitpick?

Are they mentally ill?

>>713681228
kek what the fuck
i dodged a bullet

>>713687227
god damn bototm looks fucking awful
is that switch 2?

>>713692490
>Are they mentally ill?

Yes.

>>713691615
Why do nips always have pfps like that.
I can't really describe what they're like but it's a pattern.

>>713692818
>he said while denying objective reality

>>713692703
No, it's a synthetic comparison based on Hardware Unboxed's data and video footage.

>Independent testing
Mork?

>>713693449
in english doc

>>713679880
We were talking about Wii U dipshit

i cant tell if the people defending this are being sincere or not

In this thread is the first time I've ever seen Snoys admit the PSP screen was pure ass in all my years shitposting on the internet

So this entire thread is going to be Nintendo animals coping if I scroll up?

>>713693373
He copes.

>>713693845
yes

>>713693845
It's so fucking funny to me seeing tendies blindly defend this by pivoting to other devices and never admitting or addressing the fact that the switch 2 was a giant blunder.

>>713693973
>time slowed down 90%

Whoa

>>713693765
psp was 20 years ago
nintendo shouldn't even be able to be compared to a 20 year old screen
panel technology has become a lot cheaper and oleds exist and are basically perfect
i bought a 1080p 144hz tn panel monitor 10 years ago and i could buy a 1440p 240hz fast ips panel for the same price disregarding inflation

>>713694305
I really think you, a snoy, still don't understand just how shitty the PSP screen actually was. It was horrifyingly bad. A big reason it got mogged by DS which likewise had a poor screen, it just was way less blurry than the PSP one.

>>713694365
and it was 20 years ago
TWENTY YEARS AGO
i'm closer to a tendie if you want to call me names, the last consoles i've owned were a ps3 and a 3ds
there's no excuse for a nintendo consumer to defend not having an oled day one unless you want to get fucked

So your other thread died and you moved to samefag here?

>>713694365
psp does not look blurry at all, it even has scan lines it looks extremely crispy.
i have both ds and psp right now and i don't see that much of a difference. those were also the top of the line screens available for portables unlike now where nintendo cheaps out to clearly make an oled model in the future

>>713665494 (OP)
Shrinkflation. Competence crisis. Season unending.

I'm starting to regret buying a switch 2, bros...