>>16745213
This doesn't address the original point at all, which is about the reflexive property of equality. Bringing up 2+2=5 is a non sequitur. it’s not logically connected to the statement 1 = 1. Mathematical truths are derived from formal systems of logic and are not a matter of belief. The reflexive property is a foundational axiom in math. It's universally accepted because it's necessary for coherent reasoning. Introducing irrelevant slogans like 2+2=5 or ambiguous notions of “belief” doesn’t refute this principle. You're just derailing into pseudo-intellectual vagueness. If you want to challenge the axiom, you’d have to reject standard logic systems altogether,and if you do that then you’re no longer engaging in reasoned argument, just incoherent wordplay.