Thread 713894515

>AMD RDNA 3: Were Buyers Screwed Over in Hindsight?

7900 XTX bros, are we toast?

>>713894515 (OP)
It would be nice if AMD would actually fucking try. AMD GPU shills are basically nintendofags now, they'll lap up any shitty subpar product they get.

why is it impossible for poojeets to stick to the board topic?

>>713894825
Hardware and GPUs are tangentially related to video games. Do you think we should also ban threads about consoles?

>>713894749
not wrong
I have a switch 2 and full amd system

>>713894515 (OP)
Amd cucks eternally btfo

>>713894515 (OP)
Qrd of the video?

>>713894515 (OP)
in short: yes.
no cuda, no ai, no rt. it was obsolete on release.
only fools bought amd. hence why nvidia gpu share rose above 90% and amd fell to record low.

>>713899567
>snakeoil snakeoil snakeoil
Did the card actually fall off in performance or are you just shilling for the latest iteration of fake frames?
Not watching your gay video of 2 dudes talking into a camera for 40 minutes.

>>713894515 (OP)
>50 minute video where the two fags sit painfully close to each other and laugh it out
haha
hahaha
AUSSIE FAGGOTS

>>713894515 (OP)
>>713900481
>elbows almost touching
>no marriage rings on either one of them
>one of them is clearly a bottom
yep, certified fags

6900XT and happy here

any intel arc enjoyers here ?

>>713902483
>any enjoyers of the gpu that is a total waste outside of the 6 intel-curated games?
no

>>713902483
Is DX11 even working on that thing? I don't play new games much.

>>713902483
Ultra meme.

>>713897789
>It is bad now because the 9070XT and 9060XT are similarly price/performance and have FSR4.
>They like FSR4.
You can hack FSR4 onto a 7900XTX, but it performs terribly. AMD is working on FSR3.5 or porting FSR4 to 7000 series.

>>713894515 (OP)
Anyone who didnt buy a 6800xt was a moron and will have to wait for 10+ years before upgrading

Thats how dogshit current gen GPUs are. Thats what you idiots get for paying $1500 for a cut die DLSS upscaler. Last gen GPUs out perform current gen counterparts because they cut down dies and reduced raster performance.

>>713900717
They're aussies. No straight man has lived there since the 90s.

My XTX can run all the games I like at true 4K so I'm a winner as far as I'm concerned.

>>713905256
Not for long.

i have nvidia. i want to gt amd because theyre cheaper but i use stablediffusion and as far as i know amd is just not as good for that

>>713905256
I regret not getting a 7900XTX for $820, that is the price of a 9070XT now. I have yet to play and game with Ray tracing or FSR.

>>713894515 (OP)
>/v/ when it's 2023 and i tell them older RDNA cards are not the best buy because they're feature-starved while being overpriced, and as soon as AMD finally makes some tech progress the older RDNA cards will be unable to use it
SHUT THE FUCK UP PAID SHILL SCHIZO
>/v/ when it's 2025 and Youtubers tell them older RDNA cards were not the best buy because they were feature-starved while being overpriced, and as soon as AMD finally made some tech progress the older RDNA cards ended up being unable to use it
omg so true!

>>713906662
Okay, but smart people are waiting for UDNA.

>>713906732
this
currently on RDNA1 and will switch to UDNA1 then I wait for NextDNA1
I'm 1 with the GPU

>>713906732
>2027 UDNA is ready to release
>Delay release to after NVIDIA 7000 series to price it as high as possible
>Stop producing RDNA4 cards 6 months before release so there is no supply of previous gen before release
>Price it 10% better price/performance >Software stack still not comparable to NVIDIA
>Market share shrinks furthur
I'm so hyped for UDNA

I still have my 6900xt and I couldnt care less

>>713894515 (OP)
>bought my XTX for $820 back in October when stock wasn't an issue
>enjoy 24GB of VRAM and good Linux performance
>watch as Noviyda users have been dealing with 12VHPWR, missing ROPs, stock issues and scalpers

>>713907364
Don't forget the novideo drivers, all my games were hanging for 2-3 minutes before they launch until I rolled back the driver again.

>>713906662
You never predicted these things.

Only reason we "need" DLSS/FSR4 is because UE5 is trash.

>>713908017
Interesting how DLSS went from being an add-on feature to help older 2060s/2070s punch above their weight class to being mandatory on new games to get 60fps...

>>713894515 (OP)
No. Next question.

>>713902793
And that hack is done by third-parties. Why's AMD taking their time? Surely, they'd have something between XeSS and FSR4 out by now.

>>713908319
>Interesting how DLSS went from being an add-on feature to help older 2060s/2070s punch above their weight class
DLSS was never ever this. DLSS was originally built as an antialiasing solution and then advertised as a way to help xx80/xx90 cards still have playable frames when activating raytracing at 4k.
This "DLSS actually exists to help my prehistoric card stay relevant for a year or two longer" thing is made up, co-opted by poorfags who love to misuse tech just like with most technology.

These aussie pricks who play nothing other than fortnite forgot that other games require graphics and clarity only nvidia can render

At the end of the day only 10% are idiots so nvidia has 90% market share

>>713908402
https://youtu.be/_G4ymGTnoTo?t=525
Said hack in action. Low compatibility, but that's rapid progress considering just about a week ago, it was full of graphical glitches. FSR 4.0.1 is half the performance of FSR 4.0.0, though. I'm not going to pretend I know why.

>>713897789
https://youtu.be/k1mDbbwtMm0?t=707
Basically the only relevant bit in it.

>>713908860
>>713896689
Average malding Nvot.
>No! I'm not mad! FUCK! YOU ARE! YOU!
HAHAHAHAHAHA

>>713894515 (OP)
Is using DLSS/FSR a good alternative to using AA?

>>713910462
Depends on the game, on your resolution, and on which DLSS/FSR version you're using. It's not a "just turn it on and forget about it" solution yet.

>>713910582
>It's not a "just turn it on and forget about it" solution yet.
Then I don't think people on RDNA3 were duped.

>>713911037
They were because their FSR version is dogshit, or they're stuck using TAA which is also dogshit. FSR4 takes a bit more tinkering to get it working right but when you get it working right, it's got much better IQ than what RDNA3 gets you.

>>713908402
Isnt it that they can emulate fsr4.0 on 7xxx but it runs like shit and glitches because, just like nvidia, uses hardware to do it?
Which is pretty funny because the last decade its all been
>lol you dont need hardware for upscaling amd showed them
>well yeah ok, its a bit shit but you dont need it, they'l fix it with fsr 3
>well yeah, fsr 3 is still fucking shit but at least I'm not getting scammed by nvidia
>Fsr4 is here and it looks a lot better because it used new hardware so we cant use it in old hardware lmao
>this is fine

>>713902793
>AMD is working on FSR3.5 or porting FSR4 to 7000 series.
They probably aren't. All they've said is they'll look into it but that's corpo speak for "I can't say no otherwise no one will buy the stock that still exists in retail"
It's pure copium from AMDfags like always

>>713911773
I wouldn't trust them even if they said they were working on it officially. In the best cases, AMD takes a LONG time to deliver software.

>>713910462
DLSS and FSR4 are essentially modern TAA but really good
DLSS transformer model especially

>>713894515 (OP)
Considering that the GPU market it's absolutely shit regarding improvements from one gen to another, making a upgrade from 4060 to 5080 next month will probably buy a lot of time for me, though 16GB VRAM absolutely sucks since GayTracing devours VRAM.

anyone who buys AMD anything might as well just get "bellend" tattoo'd to their forehead