>>714075002
>It's pretty simple. If an online-only game gets shut down, they should then provide a patch that either enables offline play, LAN play, or simply just release the server code so people can host their own servers.
Already doable with ANY shut down game. You got the game files, that's all you fucking need. Anything else can be coded and set up by a retarded baboon. If NOBODY in the game's community made such simple tools - the game can rightfully stay dead, nobody cares.
>Why should they not?
Why make it harder to make and release a game, tranny? What else must I do, make sure that a European sissy is not crying from bright colors in my game, so I should make it black and white for a EU release? Eat shit.
>If someone pays for a product, they should be able to play it at any point they want
Imagine, there is such a thing as paying for an experience. Movie theaters exist for nearly hundred of years. I bet your mind will literally explode once you hear about paying for a ticked and watching the movie once, then being forced to go home instead of staying and living in the cinema hall.
>even if it's 10 years later
What the fuck are you even doing with your life playing fucking video games 10 years later? People don't live that long, your body start going downhill at 40s and onward, your dick will stop working and you will have no energy. What fucking games. Who the fuck cares.
>You agree that people should be allowed to host their own servers?
Nobody is stopping, nor punishing you for hosting your own servers. Go, tranny, go and be happy. You already have what you are supposedly petitioning for.
