>>714303813 (OP)Forget Netflix vs Blockbuster. Steam's rise beats the ever loving shit out of it.
Anon, what do PCs run on? Windows. Windows. The PC market was dependent on Windows. It still is, but infrastructure exists now to make it easier to get off windows. That just wasn't a thing in the 2000s. No, Steam in this scenario is like if Netflix appeared as one of dozens of other proto storefronts while the US postal service also had their own storefront, but they went all in on consoles so hard with Xbox they forgot to make Games for Windows Live actually good, abandoned it completely, and let the random jackasses that made Half-Life take over everything.
Valve came out of fucking nowhere.
Had Microsoft said 'lol, we're going act like PC is a console and monopolize what's on the platform harder than Nintendo did on the NES" the PC market's response would have been to suck off Microsoft until they became Macrohard. Instead, they fucked off for a decade, letting Valve build up the money and infrastructure to where now you almost can't succeed on PC without daddy Gaben's approval. The rest of the market at the time? What were faggots like Pitchford doing? What was Tim Sweeny saying?
>"Oh, we're done with PC. PC gaming is dead."Ten years too late to the party, they realize they fucked up, but then push their own gay little storefronts with half the features and twice the ass, now with jackasses like Pitchford saying...
>"Oh yeah, Steam will probably be a dead storefront in 5-10 years."Valve didn't climb to the top of all storefronts. Everyone else just dug themselves into holes. There are only a handful of niche storefronts more consumer friendly than Steam (like GoG). Speaking of, why is GoG even on here alongside EA and Ubisoft? Forget your recency bias and go back to when CDPR was a AA studio making Witcher 2. EA had like a 15 year headstart, so why is GoG outperforming Origin at all?