>>714599460we're probably not in agreement because what you consider "cute art" is probably not what I do either
even whatever 80s disney stuff you might be thinking of doesn't work here. if they want to fuck chip n' dale or sally acorn or whatever, that's not good enough. this needs to be done by people who want to fuck like, 1920s cartoons and 1960s UPA characters but only very specific ones and maybe some 60s european comics like moomin
>>714599606that's all up to you, but to get something that properly vibes with "animal crossing with sex", you need someone who is able to only focus on specific design language elements and I've mostly found furries unable to