>>714978205 (OP)
why would a successful indie go on sale and degrade the value of his own product anyway?
they don't have share holders to please with bigger sale numbers, they don't have a fat cat boss slamming the desk from not being able to afford a another yacht
people that likes it buys it and people that can't afford pirates
>>714979043 >and degrade the value of his own product anyway?
What kind of retarded take is this? If you lower the price during sale you will get more buyers that would not buy it normally, making you more money in total. Where the fuck is the inherent value in a fucking video game?
>>714978205 (OP)
if you wait for a game to go on sale for over 10 years then at this point you could have just pirated it or payed full price. Hell, I remember the dev being cool with you pirating it.
