Thread 714988924

@grok is this real?

>>714988924 (OP)
Because firthy fakking gaijin shourd just shut up and pray what they are tord to pray.

>>714988924 (OP)
anybody who has ever had a job knows this childish tantrum is nonsense.

>>714988924 (OP)
They're anti consumer

>>714988924 (OP)
Imagine you're a company and you've JUST outwaited last-gen to be done with Destiny, and you wanted to make NintenDestiny but now there's lawmakers on a governmental level saying "You can't make NintenDestiny, you must make it offline too."

I'd be pissed if I was making Zelda: Breath of the Destiny, and I suddenly couldn't justify my plan to monetize and drip-feed a AAA game's worth of content over 1 year at a time and ask for 40 extra bucks each time a year passes.

>>714988924 (OP)
Because nintendo is the disney of video games now. Capitalistic, devoid of standards.

>>714988924 (OP)
>Snoy vision

All penises cum on OP

>>714988924 (OP)
>Why is the most antiquated company known for absolutely hating their customers lobbying for fucking their customers over?

Don't worry sweetie, look the at the pretty bing bing wahoo jingling keys

>>714989202
Kek
>>714989328
>>714991248
So true

>>714989515
Kek, it do be like that

>>714988924 (OP)
>Why are women against "grape"?

Nintendo are possibly the least "Stop Killing Games" friendly company in the industry.

Not everything is worth preserving

>>714988924 (OP)
Just like Sony, or Microsoft, they hate theirs consumers

Games are goods
Nuff said

>>714988924 (OP)
Nortubel isn't

>>714993791
But we all know full well that Nintendo takes active steps against anyone trying to preserve things that are "worth preserving".
The success of SKG would mean that the things that are worth preserving, will be preserved.

>>714992936
Why?

>>714989515
It's only bad if Nintendo does it

>>714988924 (OP)
Because they want to kill games.

>>714988924 (OP)
because ERIC and SNOY and ERIC and SNOY and ERIC and SNOY and ERIC and SNOY and ERIC and SNOY and ERIC and SNOY and ERIC and SNOY and ERIC and SNOY and ERIC

They are run by Tengu's.

>why is the greediest video game company against something that’s pro consumer
No fucking clue mate.

>because ER-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>a-a-a-and SN-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>a-a-a-a-a-a-a-and ER-
HAVE A ROTTEN DAY!

>>714995976
This tendie hates it when someone shits on his friends at Nintendo

>>714995747
Eric sure likes exposing himself when no one is talking about him

allowing people to host and profit off another mans work is a race to the bottom

>>714996423
This. We must defend corporations at all costs.

>T-This tendie hat-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>h-h-hates it when some-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>s-shits on his frien-
HAVE A ROTTEN DAY!

>>714996638
Absolute pathetic faggot
Par the course for the average tendie

I'm not a Nintendo dick sucker, but they did do exactly what SKG wants with Pocket Camp after they discontinued support. On the flip side, didn't they completely kill Dragalia Lost?

>A-Absolute pathe-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-faggot
WAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>P-P-P-Par the cou-
HURRY UP
>f-f-f-for the aver-
HAVE A ROTTEN DAY

>>714996863
You forgot you gay little avatar

>>714996897
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iKfMVh4mQM

>>714996974
>he defends Nintendo for hours on end for free
Grim

>>714996784
Cygames killed it, not Nintendo

>>714996638
>>714996863
>>714996974
Why do tendies defend bad business practices?

>h-h-h-h-h-he defends Ninte-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>f-f-f-f-for hours on en-
HURRY UP!
>G-Gri-
HAVE A ROTTEN DAY!

>>714997171
What part of “they’re in a cult” did you think was hyperbole?

this whole board is retarded adults punching down on actual children

>>714997248
Despite how they act, tendies are not children.

>>714997171
>>714997085
>a minute apart

>>714994879
Try buying any digital title for the Wii or 3DS.
Try playing Mario 35.

>>714997171
>warioposter makes fun of him
>"STOP BOOTLICKING!"
?

>>714997321
Did the Mario clock finally teach you how to tell time? Good for you!

HERE I GO!
>W-why do t-tendies def-
EEEHEHEHEHE
>W-What part of "they're i-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>t-t-this whole boar-
YA HOO
>D-D-Despite how th-
HURRY UP!
>D-Did the Mario clo-
HAVE A ROTTEN DAY!

I'MMA WARIO, I'MMA GONNA WIN!

>>714997418
>someone else shat on my total epic wario posts defending Nintendo
>must have been the same guy!
grim and sad

>>714997429
so how big is your CP folder, eric?

>s-s-someone else shat on my tot-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>m-m-m-must have been the sa-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>g-g-g-grim and sa-
HAVE A ROTTEN DAY!

>>714989202
Basically this. The Japanese hate westerners because they aren’t corporate dick suckers. It’s probably unfathomable to them.

>>714997527
How is the warioposter defending nintendo actually?

>inb4 "STOP DEFENDING NINTENDO!!!"

>>714988924 (OP)
because it means they will lose all their lawsuit power they been using, hell SKG might even screw up their attempt to get rid of palworld.

>>714997304
It's a loosely moderated message board about video games on the internet m8, guaranteed a bulk of posters here are like 13

>snoys so butt ravaged they're fighting an obvious shitposter
grim, yet funny

>>714998069
how?

>>714997978
He does the same pathetic posts in every single thread even remotely critical of Nintendo. This isn’t the first or even fifth time I’ve seen him do this. For free btw.

>>714997795
they basically value hierarchy, the collective, and social harmony.
Hell that's basically the real reason why you see the power of friendship in anime and JRPG, basically their way to tell you to conform.

>H-He does the sam-
WAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>e-every single threa-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>T-T-T-This isn't the firs-
HAVE A ROTTEN DAY!

>>714989515
netflix makes games?

>>714989515
Lol

>>714998354
Have you seen those recent threads on how Ubisoft’s EULA states that you need to destroy your physical copies if you don’t agree to the EULA or if it’s terminated? Japs would unironically do that.
They made some great media but they’re fucking bugmen.

>>714989515
>sony's on the list
>B-B-BUT NINTENDO

>>714996638
Based

>Wario makes Eric seethe
Kek

/v/ should get a new rule for faggots MAKING THINGS UP

>>714998124
There's nothing in their posts that says "Leave nintendo alone!"

>>714998956
Alright dude

>>714998667
These wario postings are funnier than the kid pauline posting

I kneel, Wario-sama

>>714999070
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWw0RSKQnoQ

>>714999089
It’s so weird how this group of tendies all started showing up at the same time to defend their favorite corporation.

>>714999562
Still seething huh?

>It's so wei-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>t-t-this group of tendi-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-defend their favori-
HAVE A ROTTEN DAY

>>714999881
What do you think will be Nintendos next $80 game? I want them to make money more than anything. Think we’ll be lucky enough for them to release a $90 soon?

>>714988924 (OP)
Nintendo would salivate at the ability to destroy all their old games and force everyone to buy new versions.

>W-What do you think wil-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>I-I-I want them to make mo-
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
>T-T-Think we'll be luc-
HAVE A ROTTEN DAY!

>>714999986
Keep seething anon then wonder why the other anons are making fun of you lol

>>715000012
I mean they did that with the switch. It was carried by Wii U ports almost entirely. At full price too. I’m legit surprised they allowed digital transfers from the switch to the switch 2.

>>714989515
>>714992479
>>714995657
>>714998624
>Tendies: "Nintendo is right to go after roms, hacks, and emulators!"
>Also Tendies: "WHY ARE PEOPLE ONLY TALKING ABOUT NINTENDO IN THE SKG DISCUSSION!? THAT'S SO UNFAIR!!!"

>>715000297
Defending their friends is more important than being consistent anon.

tomorrow is going to be fun.

>>715000465
What happens tomorrow?
Donkey Kong doesn’t release for another week.

>>715000297
Let me translate:
>IT'S OK IF SONY DOES IT

>>714988924 (OP)
Because Nintendo wants to pull support for a game, and make you buy it again in 20 years

>>715000550
famitsu. If he is seething this much now, he is going to be melting down all day.

>>715000628
What?

>>715000297
>"WHY WON'T NINTENDO LET ME PIRATE?"
and there it is

>>715000917
>stop hurting Nintendo’s bottom line NOW!
And there it is

>>715000996
>>715000917
>POO POO SPRAAAAYYYY?
and there it is

>>714988924 (OP)
Nintendo doesn't even let you hook up a monitor to the switch 2 without first plugging it into a 130 dollar "dock". You really think they'd want you to be able to preserve games without paying for a new copy every console cycle?

>>715001325
Lmao man I forgot Nintendo charges you $130 for an hdmi.

>>714988924 (OP)
Same reason I am: nothingburger.

>>715001325
>>715001391
wuts blud yapping about now?

Explain to me this whole "stop killing games" thing and what's nintendo has to do with it

>>714998486
Netflix has games on it.

>>715000297
Nintendo doesn't make a single game that would be affected by SKG shilling

Why are you guys acting like Nintendo said anything about Stop Killing Games? They haven't. The companies listed in tweets like >>714989515 are part of an industry regulation group called Video Games Europe, and they are the ones who explicitly made a statement against Stop Killing Games. Nintendo of Europe does have someone on their board, but industry group stances on stuff like this are rarely unanimous. Maybe the Nintendo of Europe representative was frothing at the mouth angry about SKG, but more than likely it was brought up in an email chain that he barely glanced at, and probably didn't forward to the Japanese home branch.

>>715001557
F zero 99?

>>715000564
>>715000917
>Proving anon right.
Tendies can't contain themselves, can they?

>>715001487
>what's nintendo has to do with it
Just an excuse for shitskins to make a nintendo seethe thread

>>715001487
SKG is a stepping stone for "game preservation" shills fruitless endeavor to autistically preserve everything. It's also being used by commies and ancaps to persuade anti capitalistic views in society.

>>715001557
>Tell me lies
>Tell me, tell me lies
>Oh no-no, you can't disguise
>You can't disguise
>No, you can't disguise
>Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies

>>714997389
neither of those examples have anything to do with SKG

>>715001749
Legitimate question: why are you tendies so against pro consumer anything?

>>715001838
Not my problem.

>>714988924 (OP)
Nintendo own several gachas and have a multiplayer focused series of games with drip feed style updates. Anyone who isn’t a retard would realize this long before posting a thread or asking this dumb question unironically

>>715001910
SKG isn't pro consumer
>>715001838
>I can't play single player offline mario
Yes you can.

>>715002032
Such a disingenuous tendie. Make believe I never asked you a question.

>>715001557
drag x drive might be the first one, doesn't seem like it has offline modes

>>715002129
Glad to be done discussing this with you.

I'm not following this stop killing games drama. What is this about? Eruofags wanting to play gacha offline? Who gives a fuck about these free to play games

>>715002032
Anon, Super Mario Bros. 35 is a battle royale game where 35 different Marios play Super Mario Bros, on the same screen, facing off against each other.
How do you get the same experience playing Super Mario Bros. single-player?

>>715002182
Likewise cultist. Good luck on your crusade.

>>715002201
They're mad that online games eventually end so they want a blank offline server. I'm not joking.

>>715002248
He’s a tendie anon. Don’t bother, he’s here to defend his friends.

>>715002272
Yeah I don't see this happening...

>>715002272
Why don't they just host private servers of their own? That's what happens with most defunct MMOs.

>>715002248
But that's the fucking point. SKG isn't keeping games alive and active, it's giving you an offline single player content when the game gets pulled.

>>715002272
Wow, people are whining over nothing

>>714988924 (OP)
Has Nintendo said anything specific? Or is it just because they're part of a group that includes all big video game companies? Why single them out?

>>715002394
What's the answer? I don't like riddles

>>715002272
Is there a point in repeating this when it's already over?

>>715002493
the latter.

>>715002272
Don't forget, they're also demanding the impossible task of predicting the future.

>>715000297
>roms, hacks, and emulators
What does this have to do with SKG?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cc5ill3OboE

That will be +10$

>>715002436
No, it also give players the option to make private servers (or bots) for games were multiplayer is the focus.

>>715002201
You sound like the kind of person who defended horse armor.

>>715002714
Gaming preservation.

>>715001838
This was a limited-timed event that was free though. I don't even think any of SKG would apply to it.

>>715002394
>Why don't they just host private servers of their own?
They're too retarded to make them on their own.

>>715002905
SKG isn't about preservation, it's about blindly buying like a slave.

>>715002493
>Why single them out?
Nintendo Derangement Syndrome.

>>715002812
Get ready to be charged for private servers

>>715000917
It really is pathetic that it always goes back to that. Like no shit they don't want you pirating or emulating current gen games / systems, are these people fucking retarded? And then they act like having basic fucking common sense means you're a cultist or something. It's super dumb

>>715002858
What horse armor? Are you talking about Skyrim or something? I actually have no idea what you mean.

>>715002905
>>715003005
See, this is why I can't take anti-SKG retards seriously. I've never seen a single coherent, let alone good, argument against it and you can't even properly answer a simple question about your positions.

You're either paid shills or too stupid to understand anything other than how to spew whatever retarded narrative "your side" puts out.

>>715003152
>understand anything other than how to spew whatever retarded narrative "your side" puts out.
Oh the ironing.

>>715003139
I know you don't, because you either aren't a gamer or are too young to remember what gaming was like before it was ruined by corporate greed.

>>715003152
Answer >>715002394 then.

>>715003205
>No U
0.2 rupees have been deposited into your account.

because skggers just want a legal back door to re-sell other peoples shit that they had no hand in making

its really that fucking simple

>>715003228
>Gamer
I'm not in a gay cult. I'm just me. I just wanted to know what this was about.

>>715003253
>Everyone who wants to own a game they own needs to reverse engineer custom server architecture and hack their own games. No, you can't share them, that would be illegal.

>>715003152
>I've never seen a single coherent, let alone good, argument against it and you can't even properly answer a simple question about your positions.
That's because you're not mature enough for this conversation so you just ignore them.

>>715002394
if they already paid for the game and paid a monthly subscription, why should they continue to pay for a hosted server?

>>714989075
It's called MechaHitler now

>>714989515
I don't understand what the 'gotcha' here is. Yes, Nintendo is the most noteable name on there.

>>715003347
I can tell you don't play video games Rajesh. At least this is better than you spending your time scamming old ladies out of their pensions.

>>715003367
You can't own a service

>>715003475
And you can't be racist against white people.

>>715003438
Nintendo is not more notable than fucking Microsoft

>>715003138
Yeah, it's the one thing that's always kinda stupid, along with the arguments the make too.
>"It's about game presentation!"
>>is pirating brand new games, refuses to play anything "old"
>"it's because they're too expensive/I can't afford games!"
>>he said from his $4000 PC while eating $40 DoorDash for the 6th time that day

>>714998486
There's gaming side of Netlix, but hardly anyone knows it even exists.

>>715001487
third worldies basically want the good old days back when they could pirate your software, then host their "private" servers, then turn right the fuck back around and do the same shit the developers were doing. Make no mistake. It's just a greed move. We've seen what kind of eco-system skggers create when they had their way in 90's/2000's. A fucking wasteland where legitimate product races to the bottom.

Skggers want open borders and infinity pajeets, if you needed the simplest of analogies.

>>715003550
Yes? they own Pokemon.

>>715003531
Ok

We all know why sony is against stop killing games and its because all sony has is live service slop that SKG will gun directly for
NoE has no influence at all so the real Nintendo should tard wrangle them

>>715003390
If you can't articulate a single intelligent thought that's fine. It just makes you an average SKG shill

>>715003602
Not exactly.

>>715003152
Want to know the irony?
There is no anti-skg side, everyone against it has their own reason, be it the fact that it's just a bunch of people who don't want to accept responsibility for their own actions, the fact that it ultimately won't fix anything since companies could freely kill games and just sell an offline version or the fact that there's a cabal of youtuber driven shills pushing it without actually thinking, you're just "too stupid to understand anything other than how to spew whatever retarded narrative "your side" puts out".

And you won't take this to heart and think "wow, maybe I am the problem" you'll cry and whine just like you are right now.

>>715003390
The fact you posted this instead of an argument just proves I'm right.

>>715003745
Case in point.

>>715003715
>UMM IT WON'T FIX ANYTHING SO DON'T EVEN TRY!
Shut up, EA.

>>715003792
Case in point.

>>715003441
>You are lee poopoo brown jeet!
Ok so you are calling me names now, so go kill yourself then. I'm not wasting my time replying your dirty ass again.

>>715003792
>Still hasn't made that argument.
The fact that your first instinct is to assert you're right rather than prove me wrong shows how empty and shallow your position is.

>>715003818
What's broken? Keep in mind you can't own a service as a consumer of the service.

>>715003715
>There is no anti-skg side, everyone against it has their own reason
The sad thing is, this isn't even the most retarded thing I've seen one of you tards post.

Why are SKG shills so bad at handling criticism of their eceleb drama?

>>715003845
It's not name calling to say someone suffering mental retardation is a retard.

>>715003367
Custom game servers are not nearly as complex as you are making them out to be. And anyways, is the goal to make these games single player? Because most online games are designed around these games having many players - single player exclusive World of Warcraft would be a dismal, if not completely unplayable experience.

>>715003873
Look around you anon, look at the replies the person who made an argument got.
Why would we try talking to people with the maturity of a toddler?

>>715004154
What's the answer?

>>715004154
>Why would we try talking to people with the maturity of a toddler?
Because it's fun to watch you retards flail about.

>>715002272
This is the stupidest shit ever

>>715004028
Because they don't know what they're fighting for and they're legitimate fucking retards.
I remember reading a post from a pro SKGer who was trying to defend their right to not think about their purchases or research it before hand.

I was done with them from that point on.

>>715004301
I am sure that is an accurate representation of what he said.

>>715004149
>And anyways, is the goal to make these games single player?
no you fucking retard, its to make online games available all the time with a dedicated server so that people can play whenever they want regardless of when they found out about the game, and ending idiotic developer induced end of life shit for a game that players pay out the ass for
if we own a game, its ours. simple as

>>714993791
(You) aren't worth preserving.

>>715004420
It's almost verbatim what they said.

>>715004484
>if we own a game, its ours. simple as
Yeah, only you bought a game with DRM.

Di$ney if of the land of the rising sun.

>buy game
>play game
>dev decides they can running the server anymore
>game now unplayable

Yeah, fuck Nintendo.

>>715005250
When has Nintendo ever done this?

>admit you don't play video games
>Call others shills.
The sad part is, they ARE sending their best.

>>715004484
That sounds really, really unfeasible, and it still doesn't really answer why user-hosted private servers aren't an option, since they are free by necessity.

>>715005250
sony killed a game less than a week after it launched.

>>715004149
Cool, make one for Hex.

>>715005531
Well the one thing no SKGfag will ever address is how it affects copyright. In that server software/binary rights would have to be altered. Which of course would have a knock on effect with software in general.

Who says Nintendo is against game preservation?

>>714988924 (OP)
If Nintendo could destroy every copy of its games over five years old it would. This is the antithesis of what Nintendo actually wants.

>>715005678
>Reverting the standards to P2P connections would DESTROY COPYRIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!1!
How did copyright handle the 2000s?

>>715005689
Macacos just needed a reason to make a nintendo seethe thread since they ran out of things to complain about the switch 2

>>715005834
There were more online connections made to the Pokemon DS games than total copies sold. You can see a measurable decline in PSP game sales after easy mod tools came out. They sold R4s in suburban shopping malls. Everyone even mildly tech savvy had a piracy site bookmarked. The 00s was pirate heaven, Anon.

>>715002272
Yup. It's "anticonsumer" for games to fail so they demand servers for themselves that they can monitize illegally and call it "anticonsumer" when their profiteering racket gets shut down. See: literally anything relating to piracy and emulation

>>715003138
>>715003551
You know what is more pathetic, anons? Removing ROMs of games that Nintendo is no longer selling and is not present in its online services, so people have no way to experience these anymore.
But thats, somehow, "takes money from Nintendo!!! so it's not allowed!"

>>715005818
They make me sick

>>715005425
nope
in fact they go out of their way to keep download servers up so people can still get the DS and wii u games they bought digitally

>>715005834
Back before you were born server data like that was made specifically for one game and developers who gave them out did so of their own volition. And if they didn't people just made their own. Reverse engineering is in fact legal.

This thread proves that the anti-tendies are the same shills as anti-SKG shills and "tranime posters. Really proves that all of /v/'s problems are caused by the same people.

>>715006320
>Back before you were born
Says the anon who doesn't know what horse armor is.

>>715006146
but retard
those roms ARE preserved
in fact on multiple occasions other companies have had to go to nintendo to ask them copies of their their own game's code so they can do re-releases or remasters because nintendo actually preservers games

>>715006472
Game preservation isn't just about preserving the source code, it's also about making these games playable.
Games are an interactive medium, so preservation also needs to take this interaction into account. What's the point of having a game "preserved" inside a company's safe, never to be played again?

>>715003602
No one gives a shit about Pokemon anymore.
No one has for 20 years.

I don't get what the purpose of singling out Nintendo is here. There are still over 30 additional mega corporations against it.

>>715006146
>You know what is more pathetic, anons
Poating console war falseflag wojaks in 2025?

>>715006697
what kind of delusions are you under?

>>715006718
OP likes to sit on /v/ all day antagonizing nintendo fans or anyone that posts in nintendo game threads, its his full time job.

>>715006770
/vp/ talks more about Porn than the games.

>>715001838
Does SKG apply to games that were free? I thought it was for companies that took away games you paid for.

>>715006386
meds

SKG isn't about "gaming preservation" in a general sense, it's specifically about the scenario in which you spend money on a game that can be remotely disabled by the publisher, such as by shutting down drm servers. it has nothing to do with roms or emulators. why do retards itt fail to understand this?

>>715006761
>ESL

>>715006895
That's like 90% of fanbases these days

>>715006680
>instantly starts crying it doesn't count

>>715006462
Horse armor isn't remotely related to this and it's the first time anyone mentioned it in this thread.
You're desperate for an out, aren't you.

>>715006895
Ah you're a forever-online. Well you're wrong, and pokemon remains extremely popular. Touch grass some time.

>>715006942
NTA but probably. Otherwise, "Freemium" games would go away forever too?

>>714988924 (OP)
Sorry, nope.
No one is taking the spot of stupidest reaction to SKG from ubisoft.
Nintendo and such are "there are these troubles, we have licensing bullshit, it would be very challenging" etc while there's a faint kirby item bounce playing.

Meanwhile ubisoft went all BURN THE DISK TO THE GROUND!BURN THE DISK TO THE GROUND!BURN THE DISK TO THE GROUND!BURN THE DISK TO THE GROUND!WOO!BURN THE DISK TO THE GROUND!BURN THE DISK TO THE GROUND!WOOO!triformation!BURN THE DISK TO THE GROUND!BUUURN! BUUURN! BURN THE DISK TO THE GROUND!

>>715006995
Nah I'm USA white, not one of the EU "whites" who speak english as a second language.

>>715007092
>W-well, Pokémon is STILL popular.
>B-but in this web connected world of 2025, you don't see as much of that popularity online anymore!

>>715006942
>>715007118
>While free-to-play games are free for users to try, they are supported by microtransactions, which customers spend money on. When a publisher ends a free-to-play game without providing any recourse to the players, they are effectively robbing those that bought features for the game. Hence, they should be accountable to making the game playable in some fashion once support ends. Our proposed regulations would have no impact on non-commercial games that are 100% free, however.

>>715007118
I guess there's possibly a distinction between games that are free, without any in-game purchases and ones that have them?
I'd have to have another look.

>>715006895
>using 4chan as a representation for anything
Lol
>>715006942
That's a good question. There's already a number of free flash and browser-based games that have been lost to time. SM35 might still count, since you needed an active NSO subscription.

>>715007268
Have a (You), troll.

>>715006146
>WAAHHH nintendo took down one out of the billion rom sites. There's no way to play these games anymore
Holy fuck, quit being such a whiny little faggot

>>715006972
Probably because the people trying to push it are needlessly hostile so instead of winning people over you piss people off and so they decide to shit up one of the MANY threads you spam on this every fucking?

>>715007283
So the example the other anon used was wrong.
Thanks anon.

>>715007086
Try and guess what point I was making when I brought it up.

>>715007021
>It counts because... it doesn't matter if you can't play them! And as we know, games exist not to be played, just to float around as code inside a hard drive!
You must be over 18 to post here.

>>715007596
>>715006680
You can't preserve a service becauae you can't own a service

>>715007283
>When a publisher ends a free-to-play game without providing any recourse to the players, they are effectively robbing those that bought features for the game.
Honestly the fact that every gacha gets away with this is the worst thing.

>>715007712
This.
It's the same as wanting that your Cabe TV offer your it's Cabe service forever. It's simply not possible or viable.
Someday, a service ends.

>>715007913
> the same as wanting that your Cabe TV
No it's not.
Cable TV is a constant stream of new content being made, multiplayer servers are literally a computer running a piece of software.
If you get this software and run on a computer you own, you can play it.

Just ask the game that sold 350 million copies.

>>715007426
So... if there are a billion ROM sites and taking down a few won't change anything, why do they take them down? It's better not to bother and not to take down any sites, right?

>>715006972
So essentially making private servers more ubiquitous? Is that the takeaway, to make it easier for users to host servers for their own games?

>>715008195
They take down only the ones that are profiteering. Which they should.

>>715001662
>Why are you guys acting like Nintendo said anything about Stop Killing Games?
Why would they allow their logo to be attached to something like this otherwise?

>>715008462
That's exactly it.
"give the software that users need to host their own servers so they can keep playing it".

>>715001487
Apparently VideogamesEurope speaks for everybody through association, including companies whose main headquarters is not even involved in Europe.

>>715001487
"when you sunset a game, give us the server code so we can keep playing it".

>>715007238
Kek, imagine putting this into your EULA thinking it's in any way enforceable

>>715008810
and then people start injecting viruses into other people's systems.

>>715008669
>give the software that users need to host their own servers so they can profit off of someone elses work"

>>715008810
>"when you sunset a game, give us the server code so we can sell access to it instead"

you want to give trannies their own private splatoon servers to groom children in?

>>714993791
Ok. So let the consumers decide what is worth preserving, not corporations.

I don't really care about SKG, but tell me this; If it wins, will Nintendo be required to put all of their old games on a modern playable console? Because if so, that's funny as hell and I hope it happens.

>>715008983
It's either a 4D chess move or a rage move.

>>715009032
>>715009067
I mean, if you had friends, you would understand the scenario where you can host a server of a old game you guys liked to play but is no longer officially available.

But you don't so ya.

>>715009264
skg has nothing to do with offline games or old games, it's entierely about live service slop

>>715009158
>literal think of the children argument

>>715009265
>ya
In English it's spelled "yeah". Also hosting private servers of Dayz, ARK, Conan, Fallguys, Rocket League, etc etc etc wouldnt matter to my friends and I at all because we never once played offline local.

>>715009402
Stumped you so hard you had to pull out a canned response
Expecting private servers to maintain the same standards that a company like Nintendo does when it comes to child safety is a big deal here, troons are always complaining that Nintendo doesn't let them voice chat with children online

>>715008462
That is the whole point. For online games that rely on a central server, when the game reaches end of life the publishers/devs just turn off the servers and that's it, the game is bricked and you paid for a product you cannot use anymore. Sometimes, years later, users reverse engineer the servers and the game can be played again.

SKG is petitioning the EU for legislation to mandate that game developers must provide end users with the means to either play the game offline or host servers themselves upon the game's end of life. Publishers are whining that this will cost millions, but that's just a cope because the current business model is to turn all games into a service, when one dies you must buy and play the next. They don't want you to keep playing games they can't profit from because they decided to not support them anymore.

>>715009067
Why do you immediately assume it would end up for profit? Current private servers are not for profit outside of free will donation, so what about this would suddenly turn them into scam central?

>>715006972
>why do retards itt fail to understand this?
gotta make everything about and against nintendo!

>>715009664
>Private servers would implement voice chat

>>715010139
Oh you sweet summer child

Everytime i join a thread about nintendo doing something anti consoomer all i see is that its okay that nintendo does it cause other companies do it too and uhhh *posts sales*

why is that? Most of this thread is defending nintendo, why does this site attract the biggest tendie defenders? What do they gain for it?

>>715009664
As it would be nintendo providing the software, and the switch is a locked down platform, they could easily make the private servers only work with 18+ accounts if it's the case, or not implement voice chat.

>>715010187
even being able to advertise their discord in game would be dangerous for younger players
Nintendo does a lot to keep perverted freaks from being able to contact the other players and a privately run server would never maintain the same standards.

I want to still be able to play my games 20 years from now. That's it. THAT'S LITERALLY FUCKING IT!

>>715010552
Not retroactive thoughever.
If Blizzard decided to shut down WoW right after SKG passed, you can't do shit.

>>715010552
A multiplayer game on an empty server with no other users isn't a game. Why can't you get this through your NEET skull?

>>715001878
>what does stop killing games have to do with nintendo killing games

>>715010689
Let me give you a simple scenario.
I own a museum, a gaming museum.
I want to display popular games from say 2010-2020 on it.

I can't do it because it was all burned to the ground.

>>715010867
>not to play it, but to profit off of it
Ok? Sorry you can't profit off of showing off your game library?

>>715010552
wait all you want is…to play the games you liked 20 years ago…when nintendo said thats a bad thing???

ERIC ERIC ERIC SNOY ERIC KYS ERIC WAIT TILL YOU SEE THE FAMITSU SALES TOMORROW SNOY SNOY SNOY ERIC

>>715003550
In the vidya context? No they aren't.

>>715001838
For what its worth, this game has fan made private servers. They're pretty dead so you can almost never get a full lobby, but they work.

>>715011041
I can't do a free museum either.
I can't show the past because you allowed people to burn books, because they want to sell new books.

>>715002518
Private servers are typically created via reverse engineering without any access to the server code and it's also illegal to host them in a lot of jurisdictions IE burgerstan

>>715011394
You also can't play the game either because the game is a community and the community no longer exists. An empty server doesn't change anything.

>>715010552
How are you guys having problems with this? Do you not know how to take care of your shit? Kinda crazy to ask for preservation when you cant take care of games already in your possession.

>>715011454
Good.

>>715011395
and here's what you actually look like

>>715003438
The "gotcha" here is that nintendies immediately locked onto Nintendo's name on there with their eagle eyes while also ignoring every other big name on the list. Because... its only good/bad when their beloved company does it, OKAY!?

>>715011684
>this is who snoys and PC vegans lost to

Honestly, he's a lot like the average /v/ poster. Ugly, contrarian, posterchild for Dunning-Kruger, working on his own game that he barely makes any tangible progress on. He's just like me, frfr.
KEEP killing games, it makes the reddit normalfags seethe. Nintendo doesn't owe you SHIT.

>>715011829
That tweet wasn't made by a tendie. Does your skin tone make you retarded or something?

>>715011130
>Being this mindbroken

>>715010360
>all i see is that its okay that nintendo does it cause other companies do it too
No one ever said that. People are just pointing out the obvious anti-nintendo bias in this thread

>inb4 "STOP DEFENDING NINTENDO!"

Let's see if he starts threatening to murder children again

>>715011684
so the schizos obsessed with eric and calling him a p*do is just themselves deflecting? No wonder diaper tendies hate eric so much, he exposed them for the p*dos they are

I'm guessing tomorrow's famitsu thread is going to be full of SKG garbage

>>714988924 (OP)
Because it's an European initiative. What does this have to do with the Japanese or any of the other Asian markets?

>>715012354
You'll survive

>>715012354
Why are you talking to yourself in third person?