>>715393782Honestly? This whole thing is starting to feel like Sarkeesian 2.0.
You all say itโs about ethics or accountability or consumer advocacy, but at the end of the day, itโs just another excuse to dogpile someone you donโt like. First it was โhe hates Stop Killing Games,โ then itโs โhe cheated at Animal Well,โ now itโs โheโs a furry and cried one timeโ? Youโre not fighting for a cause. Youโre flailing for reasons to justify being cruel.
Same exact tactics:
Take clips out of context
Spin every emotional reaction into โproofโ
Invent some sinister hidden agenda
Make harassment sound like activism
Anita said games affected people and got doxxed for a decade. Jason said review bombing doesn't fix anything and now you want him to disappear from the internet. Only difference is the side of the aisle doing the screaming.
You turned SKG, which started as a genuinely good idea into yet another purity test. If youโre not 100% aligned with the mob, youโre evil. If you disagree publicly, youโre a grifter. If you try to defend yourself, itโs โcope.โ This isnโt consumer advocacy. Itโs just GamerGate with a new coat of paint.
Jason never shut down a game server. He didnโt scam anyone. He didnโt mistreat his team. He spoke up about bad-faith actors weaponizing SKG and now youโre trying to erase his whole career. What the hell is that?
Youโve taken a movement about preserving games and turned it into a harassment campaign to destroy developers.
Congrats, youโve become the thing you claimed to fight.