This rumor has been floating around for a while, but it's looking closer to being all but confirmed. A few indicators:
-The preexisting discussion around Jason possibly being a cop, and Lucia strictly watched with an ankle monitor could be setting pretext as to why their killing of civilians would be unlikely/unavailable.
-In RDR2, some of the more realistic aspects of deaths were removed from RDR1, such as characters grabbing on to environmental items as they die and fall. This would be in keeping with this general trend away from gratuitious murder.
-Another precedent was set by Rockstar in LA Noire, where NPCs would jump quickly away from cars intending to hit them, and it was another title wherein killing was sometimes expected while being prohibited against civilians.
Never planned on playing it
Worthless thread ;/
-Another precedent was set by Rockstar in LA Noire, where NPCs would jump quickly away from cars intending to hit them, and it was another title wherein killing was sometimes expected while being prohibited against civilians.
-Given the advances in realism, Rockstar has no desire to see YouTube compilations of the murder of hyperrealistic black folks or similar.
So on May 26, 2026, be ready to be able to shoot cops & robbers as usual, but also expect this new evolution of the Rockstar formula.
>>716167869Ok, except it's obviously going to be the most played game in history, so your opinion can be pretty safely ignored
>>716167773 (OP)>LA NoireWell, you did play as a copper. I'd rather have NPC's jump out of the way than a lame game over screen. GTA without the possibility of random violence would be very strange. Not saying it's outside the realm of possibilities but this series started out by rewarding you for mowing down a line of civilians. So fuck me, that would probably be the weirdest development I ever witnessed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_DcnkOeslA
>>716168564stop entertaining a bait post, LA Noire isn't even a Rockstar developed game
>>716168732Rockstar was the publisher. Do you think they don't have influence over development? Duhhhh. Get your troll shit out of here
>>716168517>most played game in historyOof, don't care, page 10 ;/
>>716170847But we just established why your opinion is extra irrelevant?
>>716171553As relevant as you're thread
>>716173496*your. You have a really lame writing style too. Don't you think you're kind of retarded and just shouldn't post?
>>716173928Could care less about your faggy opinion ;/
>>716167773 (OP)It's going to be the same as gta 5 where no matter the damage you do to the npc, a ambulance can come along and revive them. Unless you're a story character you can't canonically die in gta, MC's and npcs are functionally immortal.
>>716168517>most played game in history>but can’t kill civilians like Saints RowGod I can’t wait for this Saints Row tiered flop to happen
You wont be able to fuck hookers. 100%
This game will flop and bomb worse than Saints Row Reboot
Screencap this post once they reveal civilians cannot be killed
>>716167773 (OP)Nigger you can shoot a npc in the throat in RDR2 and watch them gurgle and choke on their blood while grasping at their neck
This game will be a failure but in the sense that they spent 2 billion, so even if millions buy it it still not enough
>>716174093I heard some rumors in which the game will feature the same gore mechanics as RDR2, so I think they will just pick up the dead bodies.
>>716167773 (OP)>This rumor has been floating around for a while, but it's looking closer to being all but confirmedIt's not confirmed because the gaming "rumors" are just circlejerking retards like yourself who take something another retard like yourself pulled out of his ass and posted somewhere and run with it
>>716174392This one I could believe. If it happens we should all screech about how prostitution is heckin valid and it's sexist not to recognize the existence of their profession
>>716168148>-Given the advances in realism, Rockstar has no desire to see YouTube compilations of the murder of hyperrealistic black folks or similar.where there's a will there's a way
if they have a driveable firetruck with a water cannon like in V, you could drive down the beach hosing down negros
>>716174691I think they'll be able to.
I saw a youtube in which they said there will be a relationship bar like RDR 2s honor bar.
My dad works at Rockstar and he says cars and guns will be removed from GTA VI, instead you'll only be allowed to ride your bicycle at the approved speed.
>>716174941Hot Coffee 2 is all but confirmed
>>716174093Paramedics don't revive dead NPCs in GTA V, they don't even collect bodies. You're thinking of every other GTA besides V.
/v/ doesn't play video games.
>>716173986>Could care lessThe phrase is "couldn't care less". How does your dumb ass manage to be wrong in every single post lol
>>716174976Based. It would be cool if when you break the law you have to pay your dues to society and sit in county for a month (realtime) and successfully complete probation and community service
>>716175272>You're thinking of every other GTA besides V.They revive in GTA 1 and 2?
>>716167773 (OP)>Can't kill civilians Why do you go on the internet and tell lies?
Do you fake leakers not even do two seconds of research and look up all the leaked shit from 2 years ago???
>>716174093Not quite true for GTA 5 but this is facts
>>716175384>Do you fake leakers not even do two seconds of research and look up all the leaked shit from 2 years ago???There isn't a single civilian killed in any of the leaks which is another point in the favor of this leak dumbass
>>716175374If I recall, if they weren't blown to bits, yes they will.
>>716175710I know for a fact they do. You can't trick me, faggot.
>>716175949I'm sorry GTA V 5 was your first.
>>716167773 (OP)Don’t care. I don’t play nog glorifying games
>>716167773 (OP)GTA6 is vaporware and will be "delayed" again
>>716174093They did that in saint row 2 and it was awesome.
>>716167773 (OP)you only kill le heckin wrongthink white pepo
Can you at least try to make your fake shit a tiny little believable?
why does /v/ have a dedicated low effort GTA6 spammer? what's the point of making this thread every day?
Chuds make up shit just to get mad about
>>716174248>flopYou can't seriously believe this? Worst case scenario VI will at least make its absurd budget back. The hype surrounding this is enormous, you're just too insulated from normalfags to know it.
>>716178343whats the point of coca cola advertising?
>>716167773 (OP)Stop calling it woke GTA has always been globohomo except san andreas,yes the girl is gonna be more important and yes the game will be 120 usda
>>716178516>make shit upNo, no you misunderstand, it's something some other anon made up and which this one slavishly reposted.
>>716178752You have literally zero evidence or rebuttal against this well-supported leak so you should probably stfu until you get some
I'm pretty sure when RDR2 released it was clear that they'd hastily removed the ability to get a handjob or sex of somekind from the bathhouse whores
>>716178580>he thinks this will be successfulKEKAROOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
You are literally delusional if you think
Reminds me of the shit friends at school would say about the next GTA at that time (we were in like 6th grade)
>BRO GTA 4 ISN'T GONNA COME ON A DISK, IT'LL BE AN XBOX 360 HARD DRIVE YOU PUT ON YOUR SYSTEM, IT'S GONNA HAVE THE WHOLE MAP OF THE UNITED STATES
>>716167773 (OP)My dad is John Rockstar and he says you can't hijack cars in GTA 6.
>>716167773 (OP)i dont even care for gta games the last one i played was 3 lol but even i can see that this is bullshit fakenews
>>716167773 (OP)My dad works at Rockstar and he says there's a dubstep gun that makes peoples heads explode and it uses blood as ammo so you have to do melee kills to reload and their really violent like fatalities from mortal combat. There's also a button to give people the middle finger but if its a hot girl you flirt with her instead
Beyond LA Noire, Rockstar’s Bully also restricted violence against certain NPCs (e.g., younger students or authority figures) to maintain a specific tone and avoid excessive controversy. This shows Rockstar’s history of tailoring mechanics to fit narrative and thematic goals. In GTA 6, restricting civilian deaths is going to align with a more grounded crime story, focusing on heists and targeted conflicts rather than open world mayhem
>>716186226dudebros... were going home...
The "my dad works at Rockstar" posts are super funny. It's awesome that you all can't think of anything other than the same joke
>>716186545My dad works at Rockstar and he says he saw you sucking cocks in the bathroom during lunch break
>>716186365ask chatgpt why youre a nigger
>>716186226Haha, freakin DUBSTEP!!! This probably would have been funny as fuck when that was a relevant subject in 2012. Millenial bitch ass
>>716186889It's still pretty relevant, fellow zoomy.
>>716186889You think these gen X execs are more in touch with the youth culture?
>you won't be able to kill in gta
Sure thing bud
>>716168517I doubt gta5 is that so why would gta6?
>>716188686Please learn to read. You'll be able to kill people shooting at you, e.g. police and other criminals. Just not civilians
>>716167773 (OP)I'll believe your fake leaks OP.
>>716188889GTA 5 was the second best selling video game of all time. 6 has vastly more hype
>>716167773 (OP)Causing mayhem and fucking around while not bothering with missions is what made GTA fun. Now it's going to be shit
>>716188775Dude seems to know an awful lot about reddit...
>>716167773 (OP)Why do people play or think about these overrated Rockstar trash games. Cool, conversations while riding somewhere now make it go on for 60 hours
>>716190693It the ultimate normie game that doesn't involve a ball.
