>>717772882 (OP)This thread perfectly demonstrates just how oblivious you retards are to your own biases.
The title of that thread is neutral. It carries no negative connotation.
You have assumed there is because a woman has said it and it's Reddit.
A negative connotation would imply that they are upset about the cleavage, which would mean they are upset at nothing.
But since there is no negative connotation, that means that you retards are upset at nothing.
>You retards are literally the losers you're making fun of. Again.Is the title true or not? Did games back then feature more sexualized characters?
If the title is true, that means you're upset at a factual statement. Which means you're a loser. Again.
If the title is false, that implies there's no difference between characters back then and now, which means current discourse about character design is based on delusion, which means you're a loser. Again.
ITT: absolute losers (other than me as I am the only cool 4chan user)