>>718820459 (OP)
No, they made nearly every wrong decision.
>Bad marketing
>Going back to dual analog
>Going back to single body controllers
>Pointless touchscreen
>Face buttons all the same size in a gay, conformist diamond
>>718821783
On paper it was an excellent idea, it was just let down by its half-baked state on release and the console practice of not letting you rebind your controls. The marketing giving everyone under 80 IQ the impression that it was all about 1:1 mimicking real movements didn't help.
>normal controller to that shit? yet it managed to work. if you did that now you'd be laughed at.
People are morons, the current controllers all suck ass.
>>718824313
>I mean the wii has a crock of shit gimmick in hindsight and gimmicks are just bad to begin with -- instead of forcing games to be designed around consoles the consoles should be designed to be as suitable to as many good games as they can
Dual analog is a gimmick that needs to be replaced with something else, it is unsuitable to almost every game. If they were concerned with no using gimmicks, then they would just let you play on mouse and keyboard. The Wii's gimmick was already demonstrating massive utility by being suited to playing fun games properly, instead of needing to boil everything down until you can play normal PC games, but with simplified gameplay and aim assist.
>>718832462
Physical media is a meme and so are home consoles.
Just download cracked or DRM-less games on your PC, don't be a speculative hoarder convinced that his sloppy seconds are going to be worth their weight in gold.
There is no point to them trying again and "getting it right", because "getting it right" entails not trying at all.