Thread 718947414

Does this game have any reedeming qualities? Dialogues are cringe and try to be serious too much and the gameplay is pure shit. world is shallow and ubisoft like

yeah loads

>>718947414 (OP)
Makes faggots seethe.

Why are so many witcher fans cucks

>>718947414 (OP)
No.
TW2 already ruined the "series" beyond repair.

TW1:EE is the only GOOD game in the franchise, and the only real ROLE-playing game.
It also makes the woke-fags seethe these days, which is a plus.

>>718947414 (OP)
>and try to be serious too much
no such thing
memefaggotry must be destroyed

>>718947629
All 3 games were designed to be action movie-games
Witcher 2 is the only good one, with the best RPG mechanics while also being the best at being a moviegame.

>>718947652
>no such thing
>memefaggotry must be destroyed

>>718947937
>All 3 games were designed to be action movie-games
Wrong, little underaged waste of cum rags.
TW1 runs on Neverwinter engine, and plays like a point & click CRPG, through and through.

>Witcher 2 is the only good one
Trying too hard, troonie. Fuck off.
TW2 was THE most butchered one by far, with that LITERAL "we want Asscreed and Demon Souls audiences!!" crap.

>>718948210
Yes
If it's not serious then it's shit. It's a hard, unbreakable rule which applies to every single piece of media

It is especially important to enforce now when marvelslop/whedonism destroyed sincerity everywhere - in books, movies, games and so on. A drastic measures must be taken to fix them all and no quarter can be given to memefaggotry

>>718948652
You are devoid of taste and independent thought casual cattle
Witcher 1 has an action based combat system relying on player's dexterity over stats and tactics. It's simply shit and trivial because they couldn't make anything better, there is no depth here. Everything about game was designed to be as cinematic as it is possible, with constant cutscenes just like in sequels. It's not some hardcore cRPG and never was. Moviegames were always what CDPRed wanted to make.
And mentioning Neverwinter slop doesn't help you either, it and kotor are proto-moviegames and black sheeps of crpg genre which killed it until it was revived recently

Witcher 2 is the only one with proper choices and consequences, non-linearity, the only one with a functioning equipment system, the only one retaining any difficulty, the only one with proper combat system to the point that dedicated combat arena and tryhard difficulty mode were added because it worked so well and the only one where movielike values they were always aiming for were properly realized. Other two games are shit.

>>718947414 (OP)
World was pretty cool and very well done. Aside from that its mediocre.

>>718949508
>Witcher 1 has an action based combat system relying on player's dexterity over stats and tactics
No. It's a role-playing game, that like you said: relies on STATS and TACTICS.

2-3 are literally Soulsborne lite made for consoel toddlers, and 2 is literally one linear pipe with none of the RPG elements, freedom and variety of 1.

>>718947567
>Why are so many witcher fans cucks
Poles

>>718949832
Witcher 1 combat lets you manually dodge enemy attacks and is all about clicking attack at the right time. You control your one character in a cinematic over the shoulder 3rd person view. It's literally action combat you delusional retard. There are no tactics here, all locations are flat, empty, linear corridors through which you go through slaughtering endlessly respawning enemies. It's utterly and completely brainded.
You never played any actual cRPG or tactics game in your life.

2nd game is the only nonlinear one which retains choice and consequence through entire game since the very beginning. It's the only one with non shit equipment system which just spams you diablo-loot like W3 or has functionally no equipment system like first game. It has actual choices to make in skill tree even. And is the only one where it's action combat system isn't shit

>>718947414 (OP)
old yen was a dog

>>718950623
>Witcher 1 combat lets you manually dodge enemy attacks and is all about clicking attack at the right time
Lots of talk, but completely ignoring the context and action.

>There are no tactics here, all locations are flat, empty, linear corridors
Tactics =/= environments.
Tactics can mean PREPARATION, such as putting the entire fucking potion and alchemy system in use, prepping for various situations, and then executing those plans.

>You never played any actual cRPG or tactics game in your life.
Incorrect. I've played all of them.

>2nd game is the only nonlinear one
What do you gain by lying? TW2 is just as linear as HL2, with nothing changing in the world.

>b-b-b-but muh A and B route shenanigas!!!
How about FIVE (5) different endings, with a handful of variants for each, and each of the FIVE CHAPTERS changing depending on your actions and performance?
Yeah, that's what TW1 did.

>And is the only one where it's action combat system isn't shit

>>718950623
>And is the only one where it's action combat system isn't shit
It's the worst one of them all.
Literal rollan-on-ground slop + muh traps + QTEs.
And that's all you do in the game.

>>718947414 (OP)
The writing and dialogue is good, the women are hot. That's it. Oh, the graphics are pretty.

>>718951080
>The writing and dialogue is good
On what planet is bullshit woke trash like "Whoa dude! it's the 1600s! Womyn can be anything they want! :^)" exactly ""good writing""??

>the graphics are pretty.
literal downgrades from #2 and 3's E3 footage.

>>718947414 (OP)
None but the WEG sections and le ebin graphix.

>>718951080
Only Triss and random villager npc is hot. The women look and act like trash with no redeeming qualities.

>>718947414 (OP)
>...is pure shit
Stopped reading there
IESLB thread

>>718950995
You are hopelessly retarded. Nobody who actually "played all of them" would spout retardation like this discarding value of environmental design and then defending blatant action combat of Witcher 1 as some sort of tactical "actual" crpg one. Especially since even according to your sorry excuse of an argument Witcher 2 has a significantly larger tactical depth with additional devices like traps you can use or forcing you to actually prepare for combat before starting it.

Not only this, but those routes with completely unique quests and choices through act 1 to act 3 are actually more diverse and impactful than anything in W1

>>718947482
>Fallout 4 beating Bloodborne
That's more humiliating than losing to the Witcher 3 desu

>>718951950
This was before normies gave a shit about it.

>>718947629
Witcher 1 Geralt walks like has a dumptruck for an ass

>>718951950
Bloodborne was what Hollow Knight was to 2017: No awards. It lives rentfree in CDPR shills for some very odd reason since I don't see it brought up in Fallout 4 threads like this.

It's asscreed for cucks.

>>718951914
Not an argument toddlerooni.

TW2 was the most insulting consolifcation-downgrade in the history of games, in every possible manner. Gameplay was trash, everything was turned into Ubishit + Soulslop, and any sort of resemblence of role playing was axed.

>>718947414 (OP)
>Dialogues are cringe
>the gameplay is pure shit
What are you talking about? The Witcher 3 was a great RPG game (especially with Blood and Wine which is top tier DLC and beautiful to look at).
Is this bait? Am I falling for it? What is happening right now?

>>718952462
>t. frog

TW3 is notable for being the open world game with by far the most attractive background NPCs

>>718952310
>in Fallout 4 threads
Those don't exist. FO4 threads are either people shitting on it, or people posting their shitty AGP characters with bouncy physics.