>>718947414
No.
TW2 already ruined the "series" beyond repair.

TW1:EE is the only GOOD game in the franchise, and the only real ROLE-playing game.
It also makes the woke-fags seethe these days, which is a plus.

>>716431534
>What am I in for bros
Beautiful role-playing kino.
Tons of replay value.
Hot chicks to bone.

>also what difficulty should I play on?
Normal.

>>714984972
>Should I start with Witcher 3 or start from the first one?
First one obviously, you moron.
It's a linear series.

Also ignore any and all console TW3 secondaries.
The series got hit hard by these retwards with TW2 already. TW1:EE is literally the only GOOD game in the franchise.

Books > TW1 > > > 3's DLC > 3 itself > > 2.

>>713940082
The books.
Of course ADHD American zoomies would loathe them, as they cannot read.

But as long as you DON'T start with the god-awful console-trash sequels (TW2 and 3), you'll do good. TW1 also has shitton of replay value.

Bitcher 3 is absolute shit, and console trash.
Books > TW1:EE > > > 3's DLC > 3 > 2.

And even then, you'd miss a shitton of far superior games by stopping here.