Thread 719260424

YOU VILL USE AI OR YOU VILL BE FIRED SIR
How do you enjoy the current ai dystopia we live in? Surely thanks to ai games will be cheaper and better!

oh no not the company i've never heard of whatever will we do now king bros

never said shit about indians taking your jobs

>>719260521
they are the Candy Crush developers

Adapt or die.

How the fuck would you even check that anyone is doing this?

Are they making managers check their peoples browser history every day for chatgpt?

>>719260724
Maybe make a good game

>>719260731
Microsoft owns copilot, they see the usage metrics.

>>719260769
My mom and sister like candy crush so they definitely hit the right target audience.

>>719260424 (OP)
>mobile devs
Good, suffer more. They couldn't have picked a more worthless type of dev to test this garbage on.

>>719260852
>Sorry, I use Gemini
What's stopping an employee from saying that?

>>719260724
>adapt to the arbitrary rules the company made up or die
If AI made their job easier, then why would you need to force them to use it? Wouldn't they just use it on their own?

they don't make a product i care about so i don't care if they shoot themselves in the foot.

>>719260996
The pink slip they get for telling their boss they are feeding sensitive company information to a competitor's artificial intelligence.

>>719260852
Isn't that the one screenshotting your desktop
who the fuck asked for that in the first place

>>719260961
>>719261057
>test
It's a company-wide thing, literally everything that microsoft owns. This includes windows and no you don't actually use linux for vidya i dont believe you

It's their company, if you don't want to follow protocol, you can find a new job.

>>719260492
>erp
I just use it as a text based adventure game

>>719261296
yeah, an erotic text based adventure game

>>719261030
mmmh... rrrrhh.... shut up! LUDDITE! Leftist! Tranny!

>>719261030
AI requires usage before it is allowed to make the job easier. It must be trained on what it's supposed to do. Most places enforce AI usage to ensure that the AI is properly learning everything it needs to. The company I work for belongs to Oracle, and they force everyone to use AI so that they can replace the shitty Indians they fired actual English speakers for. I'm supposed to reference it to make sure it would do the same things I do. But I just let it do everything for me and pretend to work, since it comes to the same solutions but in 60 seconds instead of 5 days. It's gonna replace me anyway, so now I play Path of Achra on my laptop at work.

>>719260424 (OP)
Luddites do not belong at a tech company. Not purging activist would be failing a ceos fiduciary duty

>>719261345
To be fair sometimes when you make a character watch you murder their friends and family they start flirting with you afterwards

>>719261401
>Oracle

>>719260424 (OP)
Xisters! We can't let those AIchuds win, resist!

>>719260424 (OP)
people will keep buying shit
more shit will be sold
it will be harder to filter it all

>>719261404
One day we shall all walk the luddic path
Even you brother
Mashallah

>>719260521
This is the company that makes more money than Activision and Blizzard

>>719260424 (OP)
I think it rules because it makes faggots like you seethe when I don't care.

>>719260424 (OP)
no one besides pajeets care about microshart
pajeets flooded and ruined a good company

global "financial" system is just Muslims finding and killing Jesus Christ, the "Malik al Amlak"

>>719261059
> sensitive company information
Lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
said literally no one.

>>719260521
its only the company that sold activision-blizzard their social phrenology software which they then used to design overwatch characters

>>719261835
bill gates is a space criminal

>>719261720
>muslims
>finding and killing jesus christ
muslims recognize jesus christ as a very important prophet, just not the son of christ.

you're thinking the tiny hat tribe who killed him in the first place.

>>719260731
The purpose of all this is to get your employees to use AI so the AI can learn how people use AI meaning AI can replace them. Then you can get rid of more people.

>>719261404
maybe the amish are onto something after all

>>719261981
he is a criminal tho, as is ballmer, as is this new pajeet dikshit guy, all CEOs of microsoft are criminals because Microsoft has been flagrantly breaking the law ever since their lawsuit they just ignored in the 90s and continue to ignore to this day .

one of the hallmarks of living in a third world country is that laws only apply to poor people, and it's why literally every third world shithole is a lawless land of slaughter where famine and excess sit side-by-side: if you know someone then laws work on the honor code. We're just entering that stage right now because none of us want to kill these companies that occasionally make golden geese.

>>719261404
Based saar, ranjeet pantshittr is the person i want using my AI to make "10x code engineer saaar"

speaking of which, where the games? it's almost like microsoft doesn't fucking make anything anymore besides updates to windows built upon a software framework made by "luddites" who didn't have AI at all and were real software engineers with degrees instead of village cow.

>>719260731
they AI for that
the middle managers can look at copilot AI useage stats and then report it to the AI that microsoft CEO uses

>>719262232
I don't think any manager would trust an AI to do their job. That's the big reason this shit is 95% unprofitable: the people who it could actually replace, nobody trusts it to do it. The people it can't replace it gets hamfisted into trying to replace because they have no power like low-level programmers and QA Monkeys. Everyone who has used it for any period of time knows it will lie to you at the drop of a hat and no Manager wants to turn in work riddled with lies.

>>719261401
The trick is to use the AI, but use it incorrectly
So the AI is trained incorrectly
At a glance the employee is doing everything correctly, but the result is a poor AI that cannot be used to replace the average worker

>>719262085
This is the correct answer

AI 2027 might be closer than we thought desu

>>719260424 (OP)
>you WILL erp with chatbots on company time
how do you respond without sounding mad?

>>719260424 (OP)
Yes, famously very good company KING totally isn't choosing to use AI and blaming Microsoft...

>>719260521
Retard

>>719262371
You can use very simple tools like Selenium to make two AI's talk to one another. Make Gemini or JeetPT talk to copilot and it both poisons their training data and makes you look like you're having very long, healthy conversations with it.

And the best part is that it's undetectable, to a casual observer: you're just googling a bunch of shit as you talk to the AI.

>>719262370
Literally hundreds of thousands of people have lost their jobs to AI mate.

>>719260424 (OP)
>"Please use our AI. We've spent billions on this thing and all we have are memes and sex chatbots."

>>719260424 (OP)
>Disgruntle fired employees complain about microsoft

Macrohard will save us.

>>719262509
those are code monkey jobs being lost to indians, not ai, MATE. AI is dogshit at replicating any technical work that scales and has ruined multiple companies with imbeciles relying on it too heavily.

>>719262385
based AGI two weeks thanks Sam Altman, I'm sure you aren't pumping and dumping just like you did with all those companies before.

>>719260424 (OP)
I have no idea what "King" is.

>>719262509
>Literally hundreds of thousands of people have lost their jobs to AI mate.
None of them are managers. A manager isn't going to order himself to train his AI replacement, that's for people in QA who are entry level workers to begin with.

>>719262616
>those are code monkey jobs being lost to indians
If you count Indians it's probably millions of people but that's going into t he third world where we have no statistics.
I was talking about western countries. High paying jobs.

>>719260424 (OP)
>YOU VILL USE AI OR YOU VILL BE FIRED SIR
Get a different job if you don't like it grandpa, nobody is going to pay you to crush rocks with your skull like a caveman.

>Surely thanks to ai games will be cheaper and better!
They're unplayable now so can't get any worse.

>>719260424 (OP)
>microsoft wants its employees to train the models that will replace them

>>719262656
remember candy crush

remember all those fag mobile games on your start menu when you installed Windows 10 or Windows 11 home for your relatives?


King makes those.

>>719262706
Keep telling yourself that.

>>719262447
No, normal. Retard is obsessing over random game devs.

>>719262713
>I was talking about western countries. High paying jobs.
not applicable.

>>719262504
that's an excellent suggestion
thank you anon

>>719262860
I will:
So will MIT apparently.

>>719262875
>As artificial intelligence permeates workplaces in 2025, middle managers are finding themselves at the epicenter of a seismic shift. Once the backbone of organizational structure, these roles are increasingly vulnerable to automation, with AI tools streamlining decision-making and oversight that traditionally required human intervention. According to a recent report from McKinsey, nearly all companies are investing in AI, yet only 1% feel they’ve reached maturity in its application, highlighting a gap that’s accelerating changes in management layers.

>Ultimately, the AI impact on middle management in 2025 is a double-edged sword: a catalyst for efficiency and a disruptor of careers. Drawing from Fortune’s August 2025 coverage, over 10,000 layoffs this year link directly to AI, shrinking opportunities for entry-level and mid-tier roles. Yet, as the Sydney Morning Herald challenges, if AI prunes ineffective layers, it might foster more agile organizations.

>>719260521
it's a multi billion dollar company with one of the most well known mobile ips of the last decade+

>>719262085
right on the money
another factor is they've invested serval billion into AI and forcing employees to use it is an easy way to pump up usage metrics to show shareholders that actually that was a good investment

>>719260424 (OP)
generally yeah, companies expect you to use tech that makes work go faster. imagine trying to argue you don't need to learn excel because you can use a pencil and paper to keep track of data, you'd be fired on the spot.

When did 4chan turn into such sheep that they will accept AI so uncritically? In spite of how unprofitable this shit all is in the end.
I'm not even really against it because fuck copy right and all that shit but still.

>>719262963
read https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/mit-study-shatters-ai-hype-95-of-generative-ai-projects-are-failing-sparking-tech-bubble-jitters/articleshow/123428252.cms
you're an idiot and so is sam altman. your AI dreams are failing and MIT is a real accredited university who popped them while you're regurgitating dead talking points from pump and dump scammers.

>>719262956
None of that has been very profitable tho

>>719263115
if /v/ turned on flags i think that most of the people shilling AI would be from third world countries

>>719263097
a call center job and a QA job is considered white collar.
Those are what's being replaced: marketers and QA folks.

Thanks, I'll listen to MIT instead of "Hyunsoo Rim" who I'm sure is a very accredited person and not another CEO who posted another AI generated article.

>>719263115
>sheep for accepting AI
the current popular opinion is to hate AI anon.

>>719263202
Replacing the cruft of all industry with AI is borne to failure because you can replace a small portion of it, you still need a human to validate it at the end of the day. Two AIs can't check one another because they are far too open to accepting each other's hallucinations. One just has to watch Claude play Pokemon for a few minutes to realize how catastrophic one AI hallucinating can spiral out of control into entire made up realities. You need someone who lives in reality to give them reality checks and the rush to replace low-status white collar jobs with it is backfiring.

>>719263069
Do superficial statistics like that really affect investor confidence? I don't think that aspect would be that relevant when Microsoft is building nuclear facilities, making breakthroughs in quantum computing, and steadily making progress with AI stuff.
But yeah the way AI works is that it needs training data and using AI is supplinyg a form of training data. If you want an AI to be able to do something you just train it to do it. It's like with AI art, if you want it to make FFT styled images like me you feed it examples of that and then it can do it very well. If you want it to do the job of an employee you give it examples of what that employee does, then it can take that guy's job. Basically anyway.

>>719261030
>If AI made their job easier, then why would you need to force them to use it? Wouldn't they just use it on their own?
Most people with admin-role on a game company thinks everyone else like idiots so they feel the need to make up shit like this thinking that they know how to do other people's job better.

>>719263267
Literally this is a new trend and most normalfags like AI because you can cybersex it. We haven't gotten to the actual AI hate stage. We're still at the "cautiously optimistic" stage because of problems like >>719262875

>>719263124
>your facts don't matter, only this STUDY does
>this study shows that 5% is winning bigly, which is all that matters
retard

>>719263463
nah, i've looked at reddit, normalfags still rabidly hate AI, or at least they claim to in public.

>>719263447
>Do superficial statistics like that really affect investor confidence?
we're now to the point where we just argue that this is a pyramid scheme for investors who are ready to do their next pump and dump IPO scam on unwitting pension holders.

The loser is going to be the one who falls first and this is an attempt to keep the plane aloft by blowing on the wings.

>>719263267
AI = another indian
good reason to hate it

>>719263447
investors typically don't look much deeper than methodology wrt gathering the stats in the first place.
If you can claim that a ton of people use it daily and that's technically true it's all that matters

>>719263536
>this study shows that 5% is winning bigly, which is all that matters
>95% DOESN'T MATTER, STATISTICAL ANOMALY
>The 5% are in research fields like pharmacy where people aren't getting replaced and is treated as another tool.
retard.

>>719263447
>investor confidence
Who cares about investor confidence? Investors pumping money into something is not gonna automatically make it successful.

>>719263536
>>this study shows that 5% is winning bigly,
what about the other 95%, why does that not matter?

in case you seem to be thick which you appear to be australian because you addressed us with 'mate' so I get if this isn't your strong point: 95% is most and 5% is some. 5% would only be the companies who haven't failed yet while 95% would be everyone else.

>>719263675
>Who cares about investor confidence?
probably the investors pumping money into the scheme fucktard

>>719263660
Another thing is that they would already have copilot stats stretching far beyond Microsoft employee usage, I don't think the latter would matter than much in comparison to the former, but what do I know.

>>719263675
Yeah.

Microsoft is desperate to find a path to profitability for its AI investment. They have dumped an absurd amount of money and all they have is a glorified chat bot to show for it and nobody is willing to pay them for it. So they foist it on all their employees to convince shareholders it is adding value and they didn't dump billions of dollars into a money pit.

Watch me predict the future: within 10 years it will come out that "AI" was a massive ponzi scheme run by Sam Altman and everybody involved in perpetuating it will be trying to avoid being caught in his fall from grace. Altman will have long since absconded to some tax haven with no extradition agreements.

>>719263391
I think the article someone posted said that there is a "Verification tax" that would if anything just create more jobs, as people try to act like idiot wranglers for AI. Which I guess a lot of indians do anyways.
>>719263267
I don't really hate AI, but I really don't think they should be used for anything more than "Bitch work"

>>719260724
>an AI prompter is 10x as productive as a traditional white collar worker
>AI prompting is unskilled labor that anyone can get good at with practice
this means the white collar job market will shrink to a tenth of its pre-AI size, and vibe coders/QA/accountants/etc. will get shit pay because it's unskilled work that anyone can do.
go ahead and adapt, then accept pay cuts all the way to minimum wage or get replaced by an outsourced Indian that wouldn't mind it.

>>719263536
>your facts don't matter, only this STUDY does
studies are facts, you posted two AI generated articles because you're lying m80

you'd make a great sam altmann impersonator if you included some reference to Terminator tho

>>719263863
>anyone can get good at with practice
Thats literally all white collar work....

In a very petty way, I think that the over adoption for AI will burn the republicans and magafags quite harshly as all of their credibility when it comes to being anti-establishment evaporates. Dark Woke or some sort of mutation of it will be adopted by the left and eventually the script will flip on who is the edgelords and who is the normalfags.

>>719263670
>>719263760
You idiots. It doesn't matter that literal fucking who companies like synthesia.io is failing, it matters that Google is succeeding. The 95% of companies grabbing the low hanging fruit are completely irrelevant. It's like comparing a corner store owned by some boomers to Amazon and implying the corner store is relevant.
Some random ass AI gen company making no money when Midjourney is raking in money is meaningless. Nobody cares and that failure doesn't affect anyone except the irrelevant company.

>>719262371
AI can't be used to replace workers anyway because it has no initiative, no critical thinking skills, and is actually incapable of learning or understanding what it "knows". LLMs are not actual artificial intelligences, they are word association bots with large "contexts" that give the illusion of thinking without actual comprehension. Once the context reaches its cap the "AI" starts purging old context to make room for new, but because it doesn't actually comprehend the stuff in its context it can't accurately judge what is okay to delete and what isn't.

>>719263859
>>719263863
>I think the article someone posted said that there is a "Verification tax" that would if anything just create more jobs, as people try to act like idiot wranglers for AI. Which I guess a lot of indians do anyways.
AI has a place but you can't make a project off being an idiot wrangler to an AI, at some point: You need an expert in the field who can look at an AI's hallucinations and say "Nah that's right shit try again electronic asshole"

You don't get experts in the field by graduating from the university of ChatGPT with a minor in googling reddit. You get experts by people who have to do this by hand and recognize the pitfalls presented by casual observers who wouldn't know any better. AI are trained off reddit posts and google results, they are literally the most basic bitch casual observers if you ever had to do ANYTHING with them.

>>719263879
>studies are facts
oh it's a braindead leftist cultist, I should have known.

>>719264040
>You idiots. It doesn't matter that literal fucking who companies like synthesia.io is failing, it matters that Google is succeeding
Yes it fucking does because a 95% failure rate is poison to their actual customers: the shareholders. Everyone except Google and Amazon not failing isn't a strong point for AI, it means they're too big to fail immediately.

all industries judge their health from startups for this reason.

>>719263563
>i've looked at reddit
you've looked at ALL of reddit? every single subreddit and group all using the platform? or did you just look at r/aihate or r/antiai and call it a day

>>719264040
>don't look at how the industry is doing, look at how Google is doing
>ignore a 95% failure rate
Is your post made by copilot? this seems like the kind of midwit take a retarded AI would have.

>>719264153
>studies are leftism
at least we know who is going to be begging for a bailout in a couple years because you thought you were too big to fail.

>>719262221
Stop false flagging AI as le heckin jeets faggot it filters the liberals who want them imported.

>>719264050
That's true
However have you ever met a CEO or other manager that thinks practically? They rarely think beyond their own asses and next quarter.
Gutting their company's workforce has happened before and will happen again, if they think the short term benefits are worth it, before they parachute out.

>>719264079
Also has anyone in this thread actually tried making a large project with AI or is this entirely cryptobro investment scammers fresh off of losing their life savings to another Jeetcoin promising AI to take 100% of jobs in 2 weeks again?

The asshole wouldn't pass Compsci 201 with how fragile it is at making code. Once you hit about 15 files it eats shit and starts pretending the start of the project never happened. This is on commercial grade AI with the highest account tiers and even on the latest models. No one has addressed the fact this shit isn't scalable.


Literally no one, not even the guy defending it in this thread right now, addresses the fact that it's not scalable, they just talk about how much money it makes a very small sliver of investors.

>>719264175
>>719264258
Your IQ is so damn low. It's like this in most businesses. How many search engines or cereal companies exist and what is the market share there? AI isn't much different.

>>719264426
Oh I know this is gonna be a disaster. This is what happens when you let business majors run everything, and then a smooth talking con man like Altman comes along selling them magic beans.

>>719264397
>trying to turn AI into culture war shit
lol you guys are really desperate to prop this up huh?

>>719264050
>it has no initiative, no critical thinking skills, and is actually incapable of learning or understanding what it "knows".
This is literally no different from the average wageslave.

>>719263463
anon... people who goon to AI aren't normalfags
the average joe already moved on after genning a few funny pics to show his friends

>>719264397
Okay but where are the games? Shouldn't these 10x engineers be flooding Xbox with all the games made with the infinite power of AI by now? We keep being told devs are obsolete and all of them will be replaced by AI, but I don't see any games made for these platforms who demand it.

Meanwhile Nintendo, a certified nogaems company, still makes plenty of games while requiring 0 AI be used in development.
bros

is ai


a le scam?

>>719264534
The average wage slave isn't a knowledge worker, programmers, engineers, and researchers have to be able to think critically, and require initiative to work without being micromanaged and told how to do every little thing.

>>719260424 (OP)
I thought you underage faggots loved when people lose their jobs?

>>719264485
>How many search engines or cereal companies exist and what is the market share there?
Not enough for 95% of the cereal industry to go out of business, maybe if you knew something about business you wouldn't say something so profoundly retarded.

I would genuinely pay an extra 5 bucks per month to any website (Youtube, 4chan, xitter, reddit) to block all Indian traffic.
Blackhole all traffic out of India, hide all posts from Indian IPs, use advanced machine learning to identify all diaspora jeets worldwide and block them from my feed too.

>>719260424 (OP)
They are covering their own arse so they don't get fired for not knowing how to code by getting rid of the good coders that can code without AI.

>>719264534
the average wageslave eventually becomes a senior wageslave. If you don't have senior wageslaves who have senior level knowledge, your company collapses.
that's why this shit is moving to India and China while America is still trying to get a chatbot to do their work for them and then importing H1Bs when it can't.

>>719261616
>pushes AI
>refuses to adopt AI itself
noticing....

>>719264573
good morning saar please do the needful and wait 2 more weeks and vishnu shall bless you with ai game

>>719264485
>It's like this in most businesses.
..No it's not.
https://www.commerceinstitute.com/business-failure-rate/
>According to 2024 data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 20.4% of businesses fail in their first year after opening, 49.4% fail in their first 5 years, and 65.3% fail in their first 10 years.

>That’s a much better survival rate than the frequently cited myth that half of businesses fail in their first year. They don’t. However, the average survival rate of a business does greatly depend its industry.

chatgpt did you google this at all?

>>719264759
>waste your time [with creative endeavours], I'll be busy [consuming]
Imagine taking pride in being genuinely below humanity.

>>719264676
This but Australia

>>719263863
>an AI prompter is 10x as productive as a traditional white collar worker
that's what bullshit peddlers want you to believe

>>719264573
steam has over 10k games listed with using AI

>>719264646
Cereal is inconsequential and what buyers get is subjective, unlike AI.

>>719264790
Big tech businesses*

>>719265008
>Italian brainrot femboy futa shooter 4
buiftul work saar

>>719265112
>>719264790
>>719264646
erm....

>>719262509
>hundreds of thousands of people have lost their job
No, bro.

AI is useless for everyhting except coding.

>>719265140
Remember that the actual number is always higher since most AI will go undisclosed. IE E33 and Stellar Blade used AI but they aren't listed here.

>>719265215
Even 3 years ago tens of thousands were losing their jobs to it and it's only increased every year.

>>719265187
>believing a slop article marketing tagline over the bureau of labor statistics
sometimes I forget i'm talking to the guy who stuck crayons up his nose during econ101 instead of a rockefeller

>>719264483
>Also has anyone in this thread actually tried making a large project with AI
lmao no, the only use I have for AI is porn, non-porn text games in rpg settings (barely using the actual rules because of the token count) and to get quick google search answers that I then verify as right or wrong.
I'm not sure I would trust it with throwaway JS code nevermind actual projects.

I think a lot of these AI pushers are losers who failed to launch and resent people in higher paying careers, and desperately hoping that AI will let them be that person one day. I’m almost 100% sure that’s the majority on this board at least. People who were told they were gifted in high school but never did shit afterwards. Inb4 cope, projecting, etc. Just for another raise and all these AI brained zoomers keep getting rejected from any open recs we have lol.

>>719261401
Why would you train your replacement?

>>719264534
not only have the other replies addressed this retarded jeetpoint "saar AI just as bad as wagie" but you also have fucked up economics to go with it
>AI is incredibly resource intensive and will continue to be more resource intensive than the alternative until we have meaningful hardware breakthroughs and cooling will always be an issue
>AI can't spend on the goods being produced by AI
>the increased productivity will only lead to downsizing which is technically deflationary but combined with expensive maintenance costs it will just create an AI sinkhole that consumes the real economy (we're starting to see this)
it's the most obscene bubble to date and even the people pushing it admit that
they have all the incentives in the world to prolong this bubble to profit from the hype because they know the eventual stagnation will ruin their fucktarded valuations

>>719262371
>We have purposely trained him wrong, as a joke

>>719265610
>AI is incredibly resource intensive
Yeah, people who shill it for actual long-term work and not just refining a mail or whatever clearly haven't used an API outside of free tiers and actually paying for it, if you aren't careful and don't summarize/start over a longer prompt with world info can let you hit $10 easily on a cheap model with just a few replies.
Plebbitors even managed to hit $100+ using Claude after their trials ran out and the average employee likely wouldn't fare better.

>>719260724
You say
>Adapt or Die
I say
>Use AI and I will keep my money

>>719266152
>>719265610
they have Claude wasting everyone's time playing pokemon 24/7 for almost half a year
the resource nigger tier joke argument is just that a complete joke

>>719260521
Based. I only heard if them because of the Microsoft acquisition. fuck mobileslop

>>719265610
>>719266152

How much longer do I need to hear about AI shit?

>>719265187
Ironically, that's because most startups are worthless, kind of like most AI.
They go hand-in-hand.

>looking up information of company that made 3D cgi commercials in the nineties for sega/nickelodeon/cartoon network
>ai assistant keeps telling me it doesn't exist because when I use a search engine it isn't in the first few results
This shit is so bad

>>719265273
>still trying

AI is one of those fads like the internet or pokemon or bitcoin, it will be dead and gone in a year you'll see
any moment now... it's coooming.... tomorrow... certainly...

>>719266797
And they're irrelevant. It's the 1-10% that are worth something.

>>719260724
If AI makes artists and programers redundant then I want a corresponding drop in prices.

>>719267313
>NFTs are not a fad you stupid luddite
>metaverse is not a fad you stupid luddite

>>719267258
Usually it can suck pretty bad at things like that unless you feed it a context through an llm frontend.
If you want a laugh ask it about lyrics to songs from bands, half the time it'll just make shit up even for popular bands.

>>719267313
Dog shit comparison
Very Dog Shit comparison

>>719267258
>>719267774
I just asked chatgpt for lyrics to a song and it told me it couldn't tell me because it was copyrighted.

>>719266602
you've never used a local model and you certainly haven't been to an actual data center, and the key word here is relative to the alternative
google can play with their methodology all they want but this in no way reflects the economic costs of producing the chips powering the data centers, the cost of cooling, the replacement of outdated hardware and the resulting heaps of e-waste etc
you can't "le own" your way out of a very real issue
sadly the mongoloids jeets will realize this way too late once they make the connection between rising food costs and data centers being built in the middle of bumfuck nowhere

I hope they enjoyed animating that one picture of a white woman playing with her bobs when they can't afford food or electricity
on the other hand copywriters will be very cheap so we'll get 3000 articles about the top 10 places to shit in gujarat

okay boss you got it here's what i worked on today

>>719267258
>>719267983
Dont use AI for information dummies
it doesn't have much factual information in it, and you will never know if it's lying anyway which is very often does if you ask it about info it doesnt have.

jeez i swear every complaint is someone using it in a dumb way
Use it to tell you what to search for. I use it to come up with queries in Japanese to search for stuff I need to find on japanese web.

>>719267983
lol yeah I forgot chatgpt does that. I think you might be able to get it to answer with a jailbreak but I usually just use deepseek or gemini. (the latter is shitting itself right now though)
Both of which will sometimes get it right but sometimes they'll just make up song lyrics based on the name.

>>719268323
>Use it to tell you what to search for.
Why the fuck do I need something to tell me what to search for?
>I use it to come up with queries in Japanese to search for stuff I need to find on japanese web.
Couldn't you just use google translate?

>>719268323
then what the fuck is the point? I know what I am searching for and what I want to know, why would I add a pointless middleman instead of using a fraction of my brain?

>>719268129
you are so mentally ill

>>719268669
How is that an argument? Everything he said was a legitimate concern. Post the actual report or fuck off.

>>719260424 (OP)
>games will be cheaper and better
yes i remember reading the same about steam nearly 25 years ago