Thread 719898987

>30FPS locked
>full RT (higher detail than full consoles in some cases)
>zero cutbacks
>all of this using 10W (instead of 350W+ like consoles)
apologize

>>719898987 (OP)
faggot

10 watts at 360p you should be pre 5.

>>719898987 (OP)
I can see the ghosting in that photo alone. So no thanks.

>>719899161
Why am I homosexual for posting about the technical achievements of this port?

nobody cared about this game until it was on the switch 2. fuckin hate tendies

>>719898987 (OP)
The wattage is completely irrelevant. I don't care if it uses less power than a flashlight. It's still running at an unplayable framerate and my PC isn't, so I'll go with my PC.

>>719900621
nobody said it's a good game
it's just that no one expected a current gen game to run at all on shitch poo

>zero cutbacks
>look up a video comparison
>cutbacks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoC1MdyERb0
Also all that time and care wasted on outlaws, fuck sake.
They should have ported Mirage instead

>screen size
where are the 4k faggots?

>>719898987 (OP)
Despite all of that, it's still Star Wars Outlaws

You can play at AAA games on handhelds now, all it takes is extreme ghosting

>>719898987 (OP)
Waiting for the Steam Deck 2 for the real comparisons.

>>719898987 (OP)
>dlss working so hard you see doubles of everything
kino. its like getting 2 games in one

>>719902640
That's not DLSS that's the display. You'll have the same problem no matter what you play on that thing, with DLSS or not.

>>719902754
even better

>>719898987 (OP)
Why would people want to play this game anyway?
>>719899757
Heh

>>719898987 (OP)
>zero cutbacks
>looks like someone smeared vaseline all over the screen
Okay anon, enjoy! I'm gunna be playing real video games instead.

retards itt not realizing that regardless of anything else having full RTGI running on a 10w device is astounding. don't give a shit about this slop game or the switch 2 but it's impressive.

>>719903180
Why would it be? This isn't a particularly graphically impressive game to begin with, in fact it was maligned for being ugly. The extent ray tracing is used is quite minimal, and even then it's not like its a good version of ray tracing.

>>719902754
how are people not pissed off at them skimping on the screen like that

>>719902525
Waiting for switch 3 to destroy your deck 2

Judge tech by today. Tomorrows tech will almost always be better

>>719904080
They will lower their standards as much as it is needed to avoid criticizing their beloved corporation

>>719898987 (OP)
>zero cutbacks
Texture quality and shadows have been paid back and some models have been changed slightly.
It still looks good and is proof that the Switch 2 is a competitive system, but don't lie

>>719903840
Anon it's using about as much energy as a fucking lamp.
They use 10-20 times as much energy

>>719904592
*the current gen consoles

>>719898987 (OP)
>It runs worse and Looks worse... but i get to PLAY IT ON THE GO and its on NINTENDO™! so its better.

Only Nitolders are capable of being ok whit 30 fps in fucking 2025. Hell even 60 fps is outdated but at lest its bare minimum for a game to be fully playable.

>>719904173
so sad

>>719904676
>

>>719904592
Anon, it's running at 540p. A smartphone uses half of that. 10w for 540p is not impressive. This is a marketing stunt.

>>719900621
You should not have gone out and said it was running like shit to get more negative switch 2 misinfo in, if you'd just ignored it no one would be pointing out how great it looks and runs doubly so when compared to the deck lmao

surely this will sell our shitty game

>>719898987 (OP)
>that ghosting
do bingers really?

>>719905252
there's none

I always thought the switch was like an "oh I also have a PS5" or "oh I also have a PC" kind of console so what is the point of this who will actually buy this
Are there really people out there with only a switch and will play games like this as their first and only experience with them?

>>719906328
Yes, does that scare you?

>>719906408
nah thats just kind of sad honestly

>>719904080
Because most people play on a normal TV, sorry but you lost

>>719905252
stop looking at Series S' FSR

>>719906328
>Are there really people out there with only a switch and will play games like this as their first and only experience with them?
unironically yes
it's not me, but i personally know several people whose switch is their only console (somehow)

>>719906689
does that scare you?

>>719906846
see >>719906549

>>719898987 (OP)
snowdrop is a damn good game engine

>>719898987 (OP)
Wait didn't some early testers say it was bad? Is it actually a good port?

>>719907013
A bunch of largely Jewish journalists claimed it ran poorly

>>719904676
Most new games on ps5 are 30fps though.

>>719907013
>>719907067
the Digital Foundry video addresses it, looks like they did some sweet crunching time to fix the issues before release