>>719911303
>a single digit percentage of the people that bought the games keep playing them for years
and that's being 'kept alive'? how?
here's the deal, retard-kun, this doesn"t bring in money
this does not appeal to publishers
this does not appeal to anyone wanting to spend any money on the genre
do you know why? because how the fuck are you meant to make your money back?
the multiplayer aspect is a meme, it's all just the usual minority voicing their pointless opinion that doesn't matter because in the end, you don't bring them more money than any other purchase would, you're not special for it, quite the opposite because when they decide to release a sequel, then you might end up sticking to the old game instead of spending money on the new one
now, I understand the feeling, but from a business perspective, you're absolutely fucking retarded and yes, you're the reason the genre is dead, because the people that did want to make money looked at your retarded ass and thought 'hey how about we shove a bunch of microtransactions and add a bunch of retarded online only services to make more money from them' and then everyone fucking hated it and the genre died, and you're still here showing pictures from games that released decades ago with barely any numbers to them as if it's a proof that 'this is why the genre is alive', when clearly, if it was alive, your screenshot wouldn't be showing a single fucking game that released within the decade
fucking faggot, bring back single player focused campaigns and you can get fucked