Thread 719983619

what rectangle do you use for game-videos?

>>719983619 (OP)
pic related. it's a great 1080p monitor.

wish they would make these without the gayming looks

i use a 1920x1080p laptop :)

>>719983752
just so you know this thread is gonna be flooded with people trying to style on you because
>1080p
but the truth is its still viable and perfectly fine. the only resolutions people should look down on are sub-1080p ones unless theres a reason for it like its a crt or older screen or something

>>719983879
>>719983752
you are brown

>>719983619 (OP)
I haven't bought any new hardware in years because I'm saving for a hair transplant. I just want to not look fucking balding anymore but I keep hitting roadblocks

>surgeon wants me to pay for a psychological evaluation before I get the transplant
>additional cost of like £600

FUCK THIS SHIT

>go to turkey
i didn't save for years just to get botched

>>719983830
for me its smart tvs. i would kill for a really good tv that has zero smart features but its near impossible to find
>>719983857
sorry i meant standalone rectangles. yours is an attached rectangle

I've used this cheap TCL tv for years and its great. 4K 60 Hz HDR 10 etc what else could i possibly want?

>>719983950
And you aren’t 4channy. 1080p is the official gigachad resolution for real gamers. 1080p 144 Hz, let me guess, you need more? Based! King, I kneel. They were all kneeling in respect.

>>719983619 (OP)
A panasonic plasma for all my modern shit.
A sony consumer CRT for everything else (dedicated emulation pc with component transcoder)

>>719983619 (OP)
idk one that turns on and works

>>719983619 (OP)
>He boughted samsung
Enjoy your expensive not working trash 1 day after warranty ends or even sooner than that

>>719984739
Good colors maybe?

>>719984085
im sorry but ultrawide is a meme

if 1080p is so shit why do all god gamers run 1080p res?
checkmate secondaries

What do we think about cheap chink monitors like xiaomi or ktc? My current one is 1080p without HDR and kinda want to upgrade but with how shitty optimization in games is I might just stick to full hd.

Dell P2418D. It just works.
I actually completely forgot this thing has a pivot feature until I searched for an image for this post. Maybe I'll turn it into a secondary one some day.

Some shitty 13 year old one that is basically screaming PLEASE KILL ME every time I turn it on

>>719985783
>why do all god gamers run 1080p res?
They don't

Dell 27" G2724D, people like to shit on Dell and Alienware but hey are actually very good at making monitors with great ergonomics

I need a new monitor that does 120fps and has low lag
what do I get

Still using ASUS Tuff & LG whatever, both are 1440p 16:9 144hz monitors, were $500 (bought in 2017). No problems with them at all (yet?). I've since bought 2 ultrawides which weren't as good for response time but decent enough. I have 2 of each since I used to live in 2 separate places for work and used the screens for work also.

I'm guessing I'll make a new build within 3 years, at which point I'm going to look for a good ultrawide, with all my current screens as backups/extensions.

>>719985783
Because comp games wants to reduce GPU intensity to maximize frames dumb nigger.

4x M32U from Gigabyte and 1 wacom tablet 4k.

>>719987897
this nigga think he FBI

>>719986495
>120FPS
Do they even make those as real monitors?

>>719988059
i doubt it

>>719985543
Nah it's cool.

>>719990068
>MSi

>>719990143
Brand loyalty is for midwits. They accidentally made one of the best monitors out there.

>>719990426
realizing that MSi is shit is not brand loyalty

>>719990463
I guess "brand reputation absolutism" would be more accurate. Anyway if you're evaluating things solely by the name on the box, rather than if the product itself is good or not, you're retarded.

G274QPF it was good while it lasted but now that the warranty has expired the thing has gone to shit. First it started with a few black lines showing up the task bar, today? Most of the monitor has horizontal lines going across it top to bottom. Normally leaving it on for a bit makes the issue go away but it has been hours. Gonna go buy a 42 inch C5 to replace it in an hour.

>>719983619 (OP)
I use a 5070 + random ass Philips va 1080p panel:)
>poor
Don't care. DLAA is good enough, in older games I'll just use dsr/dldsr. In most games at 1080p I'm only looking at a 10%-15% improvement going to a 5070ti or upwards to 30ish% going to a 5090.
I use 4k 60 screens for movies and multitasking.

>>719983619 (OP)
I got a card that could do 4K easy in games before current gen but I'm hesitant to buy a new monitor just for that. I'd like to also upgrade to an OLED monitor but they're all double or three times what I paid for the card. So I'm in a place where I'd like a better monitor but am not willing to bite for anything.

>>719990610
MSi is known by all to be shit. they use cheap materials and are a literal chinkshit company

>>719992719
get an oled tv a lot of them are heavily discounted. try to get a LG C4 or a Samsung S90D theyre the two top models
>double or three times what I paid for the card.
what card?

>>719992851
4060 Ti 16GB.

>>719987897
>M32U
I have this and it has image retention. If I open a bright window for a while then part of the screen will remain bright even after closing it.

>IPS: shit contrast
>VA: shit smearing
>OLED: shit lifespan
Wtf are you supposed to get

>>719993547
return

27" QD-OLED
4K 240Hz
It's pretty nice.

For me its the rokid max

>>719994207
this nigga in the future

Nitro XV1 XV271U. First monitor for my first PC build, IPS 27" 1440p, very happy with it. I might buy a second one as soon as I figure out how to make more space on my desk.

>>719992719
>>719992851
I agree with the tv route, look at the PG27UCDM apparently the best OLED monitor out there. But people that bought it and compare it to their OLED TVs think it looks worse. QD OLED should look better than the C4/5s WOLED but that isn't the case because it's a computer monitor that has to make compromises. Get a 42 inch OLED TV and save a couple hundred bucks for something that is better than any monitor.

>>719983879
>the only resolutions people should look down on are sub-1080p ones unless theres a reason for it like its a crt or older screen or something
a good computer CRT can easily do 1080-equivalent resolutions. I get that kids these days weren't alive back then but not all CRT were those piece of shit TV boxes that did 240p

>>719983619 (OP)
A very old flat-panel TV and a small chink display tablet (a Huion Kamvas Pro). Neither is at eye level so I have to slouch or crane my head upwards. Pretty shitty.

>>719995163
how much ?

>>719992743
NTA, their motherboards are the only ones that have never fucked me over once through several rigs. Every other well-known brand gave me a problem somehow, all brand-new.

>>719996886
$199 on Amazon according to pcpartspicker, I'm mexican so I got it for like $220, which was still a good price.

best 1080p 280hhz monitor?

>>719983619 (OP)
a pair of HP X27qc, they are not remotely high end but are surprisingly good cost to performance ratio, they are discontinued now but:

1440p
1ms
165hz
VA Panel (this is likely the weakest part about it)
Curved (also subjectively bad but i don't mind)
$199.99 when i bought them.

all i needed to do was drop the backlight down to about 15% to significantly reduce backlight bleed then adjust the red down a bit so colors are 255/255/245 and been golden ever since.

Eizo CS2420, I no longer buy monitors not made by Eizo.

>>719985543
This t. wish I hadn't gotten it.
Sometimes it's nice but it's rare and still unnecessary

should I get an OLED?

>1440p 27 inch IPS for web browsing
>4k 32 inch OLED for vidya and movies

tfw too poor to afford a new rectangle

>>719999676
>>719999861
Too early

>>719993329
why are you running it in hdr in desktop use?

OLED is shit

>>719993792
Post the original

>>720001373
are you new to photoshop or something

>>720001373
Works on my pc

>>719993547
I went the VA route. Got a cheapo one with terrible smearing, returned day one. Samsung Neo G7 has no smearing, it's great. Would not buy an IPS in a million years after getting used to proper contrast.

Nitro XV3
Got it for an amazing sale last year. Only paid $140 for it, which is less than I paid for my old 1080p monitor.
4k is really the only way to escape the awful dithered hair and greasy smear of games now. I still keep my 1080p screen around to play a couple old games which do not scale to 4k well at all.

Also have a 1440p monitor lying around but was kinda unimpressed; it seems like the worst of both worlds compared to 1080p and 4k.

Old assed ASUS VG248 and VG245. Been looking for a new monitor.

>>719983752
I'm also on 1080p and I feel like I don't understand how not to be. All these new monitors with high refresh rates are requiring you to be on 1080p to get those refresh rates. In some games the aliasing is kinda bad, especially modern titles where MSAA doesn't work so good, but I'm mostly playing older games that actually utilize the high refresh rate anyway.

>>719983619 (OP)
I should probably check for burn in because I've made the mistake of leaving my screen on a static image overnight a few times now. I do think the babysitting aspect sucks when people still talk of that as you being moronic for doing the wrong thing. But I'll have to pull up the slides.

>>720003227
Just enable a screensaver

>>719984018
turkey literally has better doctors because being good at something actually means doing it a lot.

>>719983619 (OP)
I use this, I also own a 5090.

>>720003773
>240Hz
I sleep

>>719999039
never heard of that company before. are they really that good

>>720003773
>4K
>OLED
>240hz
Trifecta of scam bullshit

>>720004872
I own the same thing almost>>720003227
There's more uses for 240hz then you're aware of. Situational thing. Certain games run better than others and there other uses for high refresh rates that i can't explain to you other than it can be used in combination with certain applications to reduce motion blur.

>>719983619 (OP)
75" 120hz Hisense tv. Keyboard/mouse cords are long enough to reach the coffee table.

>>720006250
that retard doesnt know that you dont need to actually play a game at 240fps to get the benefit of 240hz

>people still using 1080p monitors
>the resolution used 20 years ago
LOL

>>719985543
nah it's based
I love seeing stuff in games 16:9ers will never see

>>720007253
We used 480i for twice that long and we damn well liked it.

>>719983752
OP didint mention it, but it kinda goes without saying. poorfags shouldnt reply. nobody cares about your $20 1080p monitor. nobody cares.

its alright, first ultrawide. was great for some game-videos, worse for others

msi G244F E2
LG C2 42"
Dell S2421HS
Dell S2721Q

>>719983752
2 days ago I ordered a KTC 24 Inch 1080p monitor

>>719986429
They do,1440p is underutilized and 4k is a joke

>>720007553
I got this one too. Only problem is that it's not curved. I wanted it to not be curved but now that I have it I realize the benefits.

>>719983619 (OP)
The really wide rectangle that curves

>>720007996
>curves

>>720007942
yeah thats my takeaway from this model too
we'll get em next time, champ

>>720008096
>blue light reduction
this nigga scared of some light lmao

>>720008334
It's gone now

someone redpill me on HDR

Sony M10S. Chad display. 1440p 480hz. They had a shit 1 year warranty at release but have since upped it to 3 years. The base is based and there's no homo branding like every other chinkshit company cranking out gaming displays. They were on sale randomly in July for about $700 new so I snagged one. Love me frames.

>>720001373
>The same picture for the 4th year in a row
lmao at this "widespread" issue.

>>720008967
It is playing a single channel, something many people do

>>720009039
that must be why you have so many more pictures to show us.

>>720009102
lulz

>>719983619 (OP)
a $200 165 hz 1440 chinese one

Nice to see great quality monitors for an actually good price instead of overpriced hunks of junk

>>719985543
I bought a new monitor because my old one was literally dying and ultrawide is fucking SICK. I have no idea why anyone would deprive themselves of this given the choice.

>>720009862
I dunno
Tried ultrawide for about a month just wasn't for me

>>719983619 (OP)
Phone or Plasma.
3D is good. If I had to get another TV it'd be a 3D TV.

ultrawide users are literally prey

>>720009576
Whats the point of these images? Yes, I know if I buy an OLED it might not last as long as my regular monitors if I don't take really good care of it. have you seen an OLED screen in person? For me the difference is night and day in a game like QuakeWorld. Even on a lower refresh rate, the blur of a fast moving player is super reduced compared to other panel types.

>>720008532
HDR is a meme. It's treated as such by most developers. If you calibrate your monitor in windows it may still not be enough for some games and require more fiddling around with. Sometimes the HDR implementations need to fixed entirely by using Reshade, which is unreliable garbage because i couldn't get it to work properly sometimes. RTX HDR still isn't apparently doing the correct thing either.

There's nothing particularly important about HDR and you should just play your games in SDR because of it being a meme.

>>720008532
turn it on and see?
>>720010325
most importantly dont listen to schizos spouting shit like this one.
just try it and see how you like it. any current monitor has it and if you dont like it turn it off.
I think its cool

>>719983619 (OP)
>ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG apparently comes out next month
>first true black and glossy OLED tech
>immediately going to invalidate the other ROG models on the market and even the competitors of those models
>same price as them (high, but will likely cause them to drop)
Does anyone else care? I probably won't get it myself, but I'm really excited to see they just dealt with the whole blacks turning to purple due to any outside light issue.

>>720010325
"HDR" is degenerate. The Xbox1 & up's 12 bit colour mode is excellent though, and has nothing to do with "HDR"

>>719992743
Not him, but what would you consider a better competitor objectively? Asus has terrible customer service and will outright try to fuck you (literally damage your monitor and claim it was brought in that way) out of your warranty. LG has had major issues that resulted in recalls. It literally depends on the product and how well it was made. This brand bullshit is retarded.

>>720010563
https://aoc.com/us/gaming/agon-pro

Some hunk of shit 1440 144hz Pixio monitor. It gets the job done

>>720010696
>literal who budget brand

>>720010823
>literal who thirdworlder

>>720010424
>dont listen to schizos spouting shit like this one.
You know I'm right. And i still have trouble with getting renoDX to work correctly (no problems with other reshade plugins) so I've settled on trashing HDR entirely for being a waste of money.

>>720011112
I know youre wrong. But somehow you still spout bullshit on a basket weaving forum

>>720001373
>>720008967
that first lg pic is shopped look at the edges of the display vs the bezel

>>720011245
lol

>>720007694
I bought that one as well and have not had any issues. There is some ips bleed but its not egregious.

>>720011548
>gsync

>>720011478
why do you watch the same news channel on loop every single day for 20 hours at max brightness for several years?

>>720011816
Because there's only one news station worth watching anymore

>>719984959
>that seam near the eyes
Your image emanates dark juju.

What are the cons of using a tv as a monitor?

>>720012042
almost always locked to 60Hz or less and a bad response time

>>720010460
glossy is such a fucking meme bro. i dont use my pc in a pitch black cave

>>719983619 (OP)
Got the Acer SA272U for like $150. Happy with it, but I also cap fps to 60 and prefer 1080p whenever possible. 1440 UI is too small for my old man eyes.

Sceptre E275B-QPT168

Wanted a 1440p high refresh-rate monitor on a budget, got what I asked for. Works great still. About $150 for a 1440p 165hz panel with VESA mounting is still really good to this day.

I kinda want to upgrade to 4k to see what its like, but I hate the idea of spending the same kind of dosh on a monitor that I would for a graphics card.

>>719983619 (OP)
Whatever the cheapest non chinkshit 1080p 144hz monitor was on Amazon, some LG one.
>LG Ultragear 24GL600F-B
that one
I have only had 1 issue with it and that's the HDMI 2.1 cable that came with it somehow died slowly over time at first I thought my GPU was dying because I didn't expect the cable from such a well known company to just slowly kill itself.

>>720012430
It's enormously overrated honestly. Stick with 1440p.

>>719983619 (OP)
MSI MAG 275F
Yea there's a little bit of IPS glow but it's only noticeable when the screen is totally black so it doesn't really bother me.

>>720012481
why bother with 144hz if youre using hdmi

>>720012735
HDMI 2.0/2.1 can do 144Hz

>>720007253
I would go up to 1440p but none of the monitors appeal to me.

>>720012735
this anon is retarded

hdmi 2.1 allows up to like 360 or 480hz

Bravia 9

>>720011613
problem, officer?

>>720012042
literally nothing. pc fags on here are delusional
>>720012042
LG and Samsung 4K OLEDs are 120 Hz. Some are even 144

>>720007253
>/v/ told me 1440p was a small improvement from 1080p
>finally get one because even budget monitors are 1440p now
>difference is huge

>>720007253
1080p makes it easier to achieve stable high framerates in vidya. Even flagship GPUs still struggle with 4K vidya, and 1440p isn't really enough of a jump to be worth the expense.
Also I use 3 monitors so upgrading them all gets pricey, and have mismatched resolutions among them is not ideal.

There's also less support from video content for 4K, and almost none for 1440p.

>>720014801
>pc fags on here are delusional
Yet your TV can't do 240hz and beyond. So monitors are better for gaming.

>>720015032
>There's also less support from video content for 4K
are you retarded
>Flagship GPUs struggle to run 4K in vidya
>I MUUUUUUUUUST PLAY EVERY SINGLE BRAND NEW UE5 SLOP GAME AT 4K 120FPS OR ITS A BUST
What is dlss, what is fsr, what is xess, what is render scale, what is changing resolution for those games where your GPU cant actually handle playing the games?

You guys are actually retarded.

>>720015270
>What is dlss, what is fsr, what is xess, what is render scale, what is changing resolution for those games where your GPU cant actually handle playing the games?
Inferior to naively displaying a game at a set resolution with where you don't get artifacts and inconsistencies from upscaling bullshit. 1080p with subpixel info actually rendered well is easily good enough for any detail games give you.

>>719983619 (OP)
A cheap philips 1440p 100hz monitor

>>720015270
Yes, every game should run at a stable 120FPS or higher. That isn't always possible but if I can't hit 120 at 1080p then it would be even worse at 1440p or 4K.
DLSS/FSR/etc all introduce ghosting and other artifacts. Dropping below native resolution to run a game is eye cancer and largely defeats the purpose of having the higher resolution display to begin with.

>>720015468
4K with DLSS look better than 1080p native by a fucking mile. I played Cyberpunk with PT at 4K Performance (1080p) and never noticed any difference between 4K native and DLSS Perf besides DISTANT details and detail behind mesh fences looking off while moving fast. The rest of the game looked the same.

Also changing the actual res to 1440p have literally no cons on a 4K display unless you're talking about very small fonts such as 16px but no game have such small fonts.

>>720015753
DLSS4 have barely any ghosting whatsoever, if anything its less than TAA (which is what native is nowadays)

>>720015753
I can tell you have never actually had a 4K display. You can integer scale 1080p on a 4K display thats literally pixel perfect scaling. And 1440p looks more than fine, still better than 1080p native thanks to the DPI.

Get a 4K monitor and come back. You wont because you're poor and probably have no good return policies like we do in first world countries.

resolution doesn't matter graphics don't matter what matters is if the game is fun

>>720016207
but nintendo have no good games

>>720016207
It is fun when the game is more responsive and not so blurry.

>>720004676
Yes. I'm still using an Eizo display that's 24 years old daily as my second display. This is quality like nothing else. Obviously 24 year old IPS tech is outdated, but it works and is fit for purpose.

>>720003268
>and just hide your taskbar
>and just use it at a low brightness
>and just don't have any static content on screen
OLEDs are great

>>720008532
It makes everything look more real

>>720020147
Literally just have the screen go dim after 15 seconds and black after 30. It's not that hard.

>>720010823
>AOC
>literal who
retard, AOC is the only brand that makes good budget monitors, and they own a giant factory that manufactures panels for other brands

>>719984085
have this right now. ultrawide is sweet. 27inch fags need not apply.

>>719985543
there is barely any actual drawbacks to ultrawide unless you exclusively play old games with no ultrawide support.

>>720001373
at least use the burnt in ones from the actal oled threads (yes these are the new gen ones. no they still burn in). it boggles the mind that people defend having to baby a 1000+ usd monitor

>>719983619 (OP)
I have an OLED TV (LG C2) for kino and vidya, but only just that. My daily driver is a 1440p IPS monitor.

>>720012430
>high refresh > 4k
4k is overrated

>>719983619 (OP)
When is the industry going to evolve and normalize 16:10

>>719990426
>240 hz
>>719983619 (OP)
>180 hz

>>720001912
>same monitor
>same keyboard
>same headset
what the fuck

I got odyssey g6 VA couple years back, great contrast levels and fast enough pixel response times to game cs2 on it. Hopefully a 4k 32" qd oled will be better still.

why do you people buy ips, even when you're poor you should've bought that odyssey g6 to not have to suffer gray blacks.

>>720021384
Very attentive.

>>720020147
You really don't got to do all that.
Turned all the safety features off and the brightness limiter 6 months ago. OLEDs are retard proof now and there's a ton of tests done online showing little to practically no screen deformity after 24/7 use at maximum brightness.

>>720008532
Looks fantastic when (if) it works. Games look better when bright things can actually be displayed bright instead of being constrained to the same brightness you'd get out of a Microsoft Word document, and unlike higher FPS or more intensive graphical settings, it costs basically nothing.

>>720021782
I have an oled display with a game UI burned into it.

>>720007409
Seems you cared enough to get offended by it.

>>719983619 (OP)
A CoolerMaster GP27U (4k 27", 160Hz, HDR1000 with like 1200+ nits in practice). It's kind of alright, the HDR looks nice and punchy, comes with all the advantages and disadvantages of local dimming LCD tech. I think the local dimming in SDR mode also does a very good job. I would love to buy something with no disadvantages but display technology is fucking ass and everything sucks in major, deal-breaker ways so you just gotta pick your poison so that's what I did.

I want to say that I'll upgrade when some new tech comes around, but that's probably so far in the future I'll end up upgrading to some other compromised product that's incrementally better in some ways (higher refresh, brightness, more dimming zones and so on) but still doesn't get rid of any fundamental flaws that are actually hard to address.

>>719988059
What do you mean? Like do they make 4k 120Hz+ monitors? Yes, there are shitloads available.

>>720021869
I have an OLED and old Plasma that both were said to not have burn in and I kept them out of torch mode/brightness while mitigating burn in as much as possible. Both have game UI burn in.

>>720008532
It looks great when it works properly, but doing it "properly" is difficult and somewhat nebulous, it's definitely not a "toggle option and enjoy" sort of thing. What it actually does is improve contrast and color range, which just looks better. That doesn't really explain what it really does though, what it does is more like it enables actual differences in brightness to be shown.

If you're in SDR and want to display a white light bulb and a white piece of paper in the same image, all you can do is display both as white which ends up in the same brightness. That's obviously stupid, a light bulb should be much brighter than a piece of paper, but SDR cannot do it beyond just displaying the paper as a shade of grey rather than white. This is what HDR fundamentally fixes. HDR can display the light as white with fuck-high brightness while the paper is white with much lower brightness.

It is hard to explain what this looks like on a screen, but it's a major upgrade when done well. In real life all sorts of things and areas are at different brightness. Seeing some emulation of this on a screen makes it look a lot more natural and for lack of a better word, it makes the display of light in a scene much more plausible and better defined. Like if you've got a bright summer scene with mid-day sun but also some shade, it actually kinda looks like it does IRL. The day looks bright while the shadows are darker but still clearly visible and well lit. You just can't do this sort of shit with SDR, you cannot properly represent "bright sun" in SDR in any way that is actually similar to bright sun IRL.

>>720008532
you buy a tv and sometimes it automatically switches to hdr when watching netflix and you dont notice anything

Was using a 1440p 32" curved one but I really really got sick of VA so got.the cheapest 1440 27" IPS I could find and it's like 900x better for games at least

>>720021782
That's just straight up false

>>720021465
Where is the light on the bottom of yours?

>>719984018
>this nigga didnt get on finasteride
>this nigga thinks he'll get botched in the capital of hair transplants
you deserve to be a bald retard
take the wig off already

>>720023361
Imagine caring about hair. Woman thing. High test = bald

i really wish i bought some pro-grade CRT monitors & BVMs/PVMs like 10-15yrs ago when i knew about them but most people didn't

now a regular 14"+ PVM sells for like $2k (and that's typically with tube degredation) and you can't find them at eg. broadcast stations anymore for pennies like you used to be able to before youtube trend niggers ruined it

what monitor do I get
please help I can't make decisions
it needs to be low input lag for fightan and at least 120hz

1080p is the ideal resoultion. 1440p is meme shit that only works for gaming. Anything else gets upscaled or downscaled. 4k is a meme because you need a fuckton of money and the absolute latest hardware to actually get 4k. Most 4k movie transfers looks like shit. You can go look on capsaholic for instance. Colors always looks like shit compared to bluray. Since i use my monitor for games and movies i like to have something that actually looks good. Therefore i have a VA 1080p monitor. If you have the money you can get a monitor solely for gaming with 1440p but i dont have that kind of money and it seems like a waste. 1440p is a meme resolution.

>>720021782
I can see your taskbar

>>720021869
What game

>>719983752
Which one is this? I know it should be Asus but what exact model name?

OLED on a PC that's on up to 14 hours a day?

>>719983752
I have the 1440p version
Not bad, I like it