>>723435718 (OP)
Because women are children and that high a female player count means games need to be more mature? A little sexist, but far enough. Tits, ass and violence should be enough to do the trick.
>>723436995
So in order to get rid of children games should have only child friendly things in them. Should games come with free candy scare them away?
>>723437293
In order to make gaming safe for children, women, and other marginalized groups, we have to get rid of what is toxic in gaming, which is anything that caters to the male gaze.
>>723435718 (OP) >what gender you identify as? >female >what games you play and on what system >candy crush on my phone while on the train/bus >you play anything else? >no. Just that >thank you for you time
This is how 41% are women gamers.
>half of gamers are already women >this is why industry needs to change itself to be more inclusive to encourage more women to join the hobby
but it's already half, they don't seem to mind
Obviously it's bullshit and they know they are including candy crush karens into but it's such a retarded circular argument
>>723438842
That's how they got the 1 in 5 women being raped >Hello, this is a study, are you a woman and have you ever had sex while drunk? >"Yes." >[x] Raped
>>723439282
because if you do it based on dollars spent it's like 90% male and also blackrock wants everything woke and gay and they control a lot of assets and don't give a shit about RoI
>>723439075
Your talking like rich white men take orders. This is a poltarded fantasy. Its a matter of maximizing profits. If Candy Crush Karen's can be a consumer for some games, why not more games.
This is why games got gay as wine aunts love Fujo and strong negroes. Its why games are awful now.
What are you going to do though, tell business owners not to profit maximize? I hate it too but thats the reality.
