>>724875508
I hate this as well, but anon, that's just normal relationship discourse among males. Never talk about your emotional needs (what are you, a pussy?), focus only on sex like a real man. I think it's less pronounced nowadays (or maybe I'm just out of touch), but when I was growing up, as a teenager, romance was exclusively a thing for girls. Enjoying something like Shakugan no Shana was 'girly'. Even though things like Shakugan no Shana themselves were cope, letting me pretend I was watching for cool action when really it was the cute romance that grabbed me.
I've since broken free of those retarded social standards, but I very much understand why others still feel insecure when they're not talking about being sexually dominant. See
>>724860854 for an equivalent, less sexually charged thread, and you'll find that most posters are posting ironically, a well-known defense tactic people use when they don't feel very confident.
In addition, industry-wide, there's the problem where hardcore perversion has its own niche which is properly isolated from the outside world which condemns it, whereas something like
>>724862830 would get people really up in arms. Consider how we can relatively easily get uncensored loli porn, yet the Switch version of the wholesome classic Kanon got heavily censored, gutting the romance aspects because the character designs looked 'too young'. Wholesome loli romance just isn't allowed to exist, sadly.
