>>725139938
>Bro. I think AI is going to really take off soon
It already has. But specialized AI agents trained for specific purpose and the general purpose mass consoomer "AI" like chat gpt are different.
>we are going to see a bunch of AI made video games within the next couple years.
Yes. And it is a good thing.
>100%, I think there will be a WW2 game with chicks in bikinis running around.
It will have 1.5 players as gooners. Straight Males are the main audience for videogames. Straight Males are oftentimes into all of the military stuff. A chick in bikini on a battlefield sounds incredibly fucking retarded, because bikini is very far from being the best outfit. It isn't revealing enough nor is it practical enough, which is to say, there are better options than bikini to wear, esp. on a battlefield. Also, no pockets. Where is the second magazine?
TL;DR is: bikini in a war is a retarded idea of a braindead coomer and it will flop.
>That sort of stuff can't get made today because you aren't going to convince a boardroom full of suits that it's a good idea to invest money into
And the suits are correct, because the idea is utterly fucking stupid.
>but I think we will see something like that with AI generated video games.
I'm pretty sure flop liek that already exists, but nobody is playing it, becacuse nobody gives a shit about this braindead bullshit.
Look, straight males play the shit out of the games Counter-Strike, PUBG, Stalker, Battlefield, Call of Duty, and plenty of other shooters, both good and bad. None of them use the chicks in bikini mods and yet I'm pretty sure that those mods exist.
TL;DR: You just don't understand that we don't play games just to coom. Which is why your niche idea will flop and die off fast.