>>11969351
Are you under the impression that inaccurate emulation means that it runs at 60FPS?
>>11969401
Add the cost of an Expansion Pak
Add the cost of a HDMI mod
Add the cost of installing the HDMI mod if you don't have advanced soldering skills
Add the cost of a 4K upscaler
Add the cost of four wireless adapters
Add the cost of a controller
Now make it all cost less than this thing
People still going "B-b-but you can buy an N64" have to be intentionally trolling at this point considering how repeatedly they ignore all of these, not to mention either have no response or go "I don't want all that" which is igoring the fact that the fact that this system comes with all that is a selling point
>>11969416
They haven't said, but I bet it's because they keep finding issues with the N64 emulation
>>11969472
Is every modern product a "nu-something" to you?
Also I love the hypocrisy of calling themselves Analogue but they only put HDMI outputs on their devices now
>>11969671
I know what you mean, many retro products seem to not care about using original media. Even most ODEs designed to be installed in the original consoles require REMOVAL of the disk drive, I absolutely hate that. The only system that regularly has hardware ODEs that let you keep it is the GameCube, likely because it would be more work to remove it than to keep it with how easy it is to hack for ISO loading.