Seek Roydeemption and you shall Jayfully find it
LAST THREAD: >>40520948
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40520948/#40520948
Get relaxed and get weird with it, because Roy Jay is kicking up some steam both in the Spanish and English speaking communities.
>Will /ROYJAY/ be filled with annoying Zoomers and Latinos looking for their next Jeff the Killer and Slenderman?
Always have been.
>Will Roy Jay finally be revealed to be some Eccentric Flop or AI Demon?
IDK lmao.
>And will the Real Roy Jay PLEASE stand up?

MANDATORY WATCH:
>Roy's 1983 Bob Monkhouse performance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxWHy4f9W30
>Roy's full self-titled album
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mKuFWsRft4
>Roy's Schweppes ad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8LBJJVnyB4
>Roy's original song, "Spookin' Down the Street"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4auD1Y7d_7M
THE GAY SLOPTENT DOCS SO FAR
TheGrayyman : https://youtu.be/F4fHknX0AVE
The Perfect Citizen : https://youtu.be/EyOgdGnO7IQ
COOP :https://youtu.be/XtVtovghPgQ
Some beaners idgaf :https://youtu.be/7qqIFVG65U8
https://youtu.be/YSAY0utcqTQ
https://youtu.be/7Em2dP-ucbE

A speedy disco roydown on the situation so far:
>An anon posts a thread on April 4, 2025, titled "this is a demon writing itself retroactively into pop culture history", with an image of a man in pajamas
>The OP explains that "you'll remember him from your childhoods soon enough"
>Anons begin searching for Roy Jay, but no Wikipedia page is found, no image results, nothing
>Within a couple of days, Roy Jay content flooded the internet and anons began finding increasingly older references to Roy Jay
>He suddenly has a Wikipedia page, photos, TV spots, albums, and even a Facebook fan page
>Much of the content is bizarre: stories range from Roy flashing a family crowd with his massive penis, to deep frying a slipper while working a food van (and working naked from the waist down)
>Replies to Roy's content online seem overwhelmingly fake: odd profiles of dubiously real people all claiming to have known Roy personally
>An anon bought and provided photos of a vinyl and news clipping, both (potentially) proving Roy Jay's past existence upon this earth
>A different anon emailed the crematorium where Roy's funeral was supposedly held, only to be told there is no record of Roy Jay's funeral there
>Many new photos have emerged on Roy's Facebook page, despite not being there when investigations started weeks ago
>A YouTuber named "Grayy Man" released a video briefly explaining the current circumstances, only to be bombarded by more NPC profiles claiming to have known Roy
>the content continues to grow, with more evidence of Roy's existence popping up every day

Hi weirdos

Who here relaxed?

its dead brah

I've only been half assed paying attention, not this is interesting, I actually like his monk house performance whether it's real or not, but I did find this in the comment section of the guy who ripped off greyyman.
Can bong confirm this?

Spook!

>>40538840
bro these retarda weren't convinced roy was real when some guy bought multiple albums and took timestamped pics of them. this isn't even the first book roy was mentioned in, its the third or fourth. these mutts are braindead and nothing will convince them. sad part is there is something legitimately weird going on with google tampering with dead peoples online history but these zoomer retards aren't doing any research and now they're turning this guy's life into a creepypasta.

I also asked my bother who worked for Johnny Carson and had been in television since the 80's about it.
(I'm also suggesting he edits him into old episodes of this is possible, probably not. Maybe Roy will get a reference in a new episode. Sneed.)

>>40538883
Like I said, I'm half assed paying attention. I haven't seen proof he's real yet. I think it's a mix of real and fake content.
I'm getting lasagna cat vibes more than anything.

I'm finding videos of him that weren't there 3 days ago that are older that 3 months.

Roy Jay
Joy Ray
You're my ray of joy, Roy Jay.

>>40538940
Show the class laddie

>>40538631 (OP)
Probably nothing but this guy William J. Hartman was made NSA Director on April 3rd, only one day before the original thread about Roy (pic unrelated) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_J._Hartman

https://youtu.be/JLlkGEyDug0?si=OnqNbyymqsDcwqdG
Not exactly related, but...
>We're cold slither and you'll be joining us soon
Very similar.

What the fuck does slither mean? And unrelaxed. I think it's funny and I want to start using them but I don't know the context. Cheers.

>>40538985
One slithers when they want to get closer, and those who are unrelaxed don't drink you know who

>>40538979
https://youtu.be/zYoWvmo20-Q?si=MCaB_n0DqDQKhULm
This wasn't there 3 days ago. To be fair I was using a third party app and this is the android YouTube app results so that could explain why I didn't find it okay time. I'll check on my other app again later.

>>40538631 (OP)

>"He's real guys, see!! I have an old book and an album!!!"
>"He can't be fake, he always existed!"

...yeah, he always existed NOW. What do you think "inserting yourself into the past" means?? This was established in thread #1.

Can anyone do some audio analysis of this dude. Literally he doesn't sound alike a good chunk of the time. I'm not talking about the accent specifically. Listen to the songs, the Schweppes commercial, and the live performances. Voice sounds absolutely nothing alike.

>>40538998
I think it was in fact there a few days ago, since I saw it a few days ago, but before that I'm not sure because I've never seen anyone post "police officer Roy" until lately somehow.

>>40539595
The problem is that nobody is actually arguing about him being a demon that inserts himself into the past. Everyone is focused on him being "AI". Either he's a demon who can manifest himself digitally and physically and there's absolutely no way to prove anything, or he was really just some forgotten bong boomer comedian who, at worst, had some of his old content fucked with online. The vinyls, news clipping, books etc., all prove that this guy has more than a purely digital presence, so the whole AI argument should be off the table, but they just keep going with it because the audience in this show is retarded.

>>40539862
Yes, especially because the so-called bad AI glitches can be explained by poor compression of 10-17 year old videos, that themselves are from crusty old vhs tapes from the early 80s. Kids today don’t know how lofi early YT was.

>>40539898
The AI shit is scary because it's not just producing fake things, but convincing people that real things are fake. Roy's YT vids are clearly just shitty recordings of 80s TV shows (outside of the one monkhouse vid that somebody literally ran through an AI upscale filter), but because the vids aren't in 4K, these retarded children assume they must be "le AI". This shit has convinced them that life itself is AI. The future is bleak.

>>40539949
https://youtu.be/EPkwt2bXW1A?si=LW6vmcT4EEEnK3rl
I mean,look at what ai can produce at a consumer level now. Imagine what big tech/entertainment corporations and the government even has?

>>40540083
You keep missing the point. It doesn't matter what AI can produce on a digital level, because we have overwhelming physical evidence of his existence. Maybe this dude was used as some AI catalyst, but he existed.

>>40538643
>>Anons begin searching for Roy Jay, but no Wikipedia page is found, no image results, nothing
is there actually proof of this

>>40540171
You know, the "Floigan" angle is sexy. It's like, our cool spooky ARG got hi-jacked by some demented monkey gooner Dreamcast characters, with huge throbbing dongs and swastika tattoos, Floygilizing Roy Jay into Floygray. (Grayymann much?) You can imagine a big floygle BWC slapping against an iPad playing the Swelches commercial on loop. Weird! Unrelaxed. Plus it has like coolkid WORLDCORPS vibes, like imagine you're getting abused by your older brother in the hot dark shower while screams Caillou at you. Roy Floigle goanimate much?

>>40540358
This is not how you slither or floig. Please never post again.

I tried dating Vietnamese Girls… but I just can’t get a Nguyen!
#SPOOK

>>40540680
>iphone poster
oof...

>>40540157
>Physical evidence
That can be faked too.

New video in spanish. Nothing new or interesting, as expected.
https://youtu.be/rNUc-k57EOs?si=r8OYx0WW0GgrTb_P

>>40540968
>autodubbed
That’s insane.

>>40540993
Wait what does that mean?

Oh ok look a YouTube channel! It's a rapper named Roy J! Oh no it isn't? It's some asian rock band with the same name in the same channel with no explanation at all? Oh ok.
https://youtube.com/@jroyvevo9936?si=g2Y6q2n7D5-fhmAS

>>40538631 (OP)
roylets Seethe.

>I sefy someone to say that this isn't Roy Jay
This is a comment from 7 years ago. Why would you say that?

>>40538631 (OP)
y tho
Why all this trouble

>>40540157
>>40540968
Digital photo isn't physical evidence. Is also not too hats to produce an album sleeve and the record itself gives no indication it's Roy.

>>40541313
I could understand altering YouTube dates to fake an election or justify a war, but for someone this trivial?

>>40541313
Why not though?
Why all this derision?

>>40541321
Unless the people in tech know something about him that we don't, there shouldn't be all this hassle

>>40541321
parsing systemic compliance would be done with trivial information

>>40541500
It's not popular enough to accurately gauge engagement

>>40541515
yet

>>40538631 (OP)

>>40541533
It hasn't blown up at all despite the increasing exposure

>>40541515
but it is popular amongst those who normally avoid popular engagement

>>40541321
It is trivial, that's the point. This is an ongoing experiment. Soon it'll be quadrivial.

>>40541560
Not really
>>40541572
If the point is to prove you can change the past in a noticeable way, it's only half-worked
The masses do not notice or care about him. The experiment would be more effective with a more well-known or established target

>>40541551
It's getting more traction. That's part of the test, probably.

Look, the shillbots are deployed!

>>40541591
No one cars, not masses not anyone, its 1 retard spamming his own shit. Its not even a good fake. Its not even X worthy and this place is shit

>>40541602
Using it to catch potential ToS violators is impractical because nothing in the video would trigger the algorithm to suppress it

>>40541591
The point I'm trying to make is this: they don't have total control over this thing. You kind of have to release it to the world, so to speak, and once you do it reversing the damage done could be imposible if it doesn't exactly what you wanted. If that is the case, they would try to use it to do something stupid and not very important at all, like creating from nothing an obscure figure of 80s british entertainment, and present it to some openminded (to the point of schizophrenia) anons on the Internet, while winking. See if someone can see something. See if someone can archive something. Watch what happens in general. Maybe there's a way of pulling the plug if everything goes South. Maybe not: in that case, people would be scratching their heads, but not really concerned. The concerning shit comes later (if this is true, I must emphasize that).
I actually believe somethimg much more sinister, that I dare not say.
Spook!
Slither!

>>40541591
Also
>It only half-worked.
It's only half-way done!

>>40541650
Elite powers always have meaning behind their actions, you're suggesting they engage in a largely meaningless endeavor.
They'd be better off trying to manifest in a medium more accepting of such weirdness like animation or comic books. If they wanted to use Roy as a vehicle for desiring increased transparency, it's failed.
Now if they tried to manifest more accurate nodes of Wendy in this timeline, then I'd be impressed

>>40541671
>you're suggesting they engage in a largely meaningless endeavor.
Oh it'll become meaningful soon enough.
Picture this: they have a list of things by importante. All things. Comedian on the British TV in the 80s has an importance of let's say a hundred. They are going over that list, seeing if that thing sticks, then moving to the next! Who knows where on the list they are now!
Of course "they" could even be the program itself at this point.
How do you know every politician you can find on YouTube, Google, to name two popular video and search sites, — I do think it doesn't matter what you use, by the way, be it duckduckgo or whatever — how do you know the scientist, and laureate at that, is real? If we're being conservative, if you already knew that politician or scientist to be real before the 4th of April of 2025. Even if you don't believe this thread is something, then it would be whatever date they did Veo3. Pieces of reality can be just faked now, be careful.
Ted is real, though. He always was.

>>40541705
>Trying to use Roy to recruit into a terrorist cell
Level 10000 Unrelaxed

>>40538631 (OP)
Remember the summer 1988 when Roy appeared in a ss uniform in Salt Lake City ?

I think the bar was named " The Rangoon "

crazy times

weird guy

>>40541624
What are you talking about? Are you a bot that got glitched? I didn't say anything about TOS or catching anyone.

>>40541715
>Believing Ted sent those bombs
You don't understand them and how they work, huh?

And you know who was also real? The Spice Girls. This is their former manager, Chris Herbert, son of Bob Herbert, who died on a weird and unrelaxed car accident. Anyways you know who was also there financing the whole thing? Chic Murphy! The one who was manager of Roy also! And maybe he's related to E. R. Murphy, director of International Music Associates, ltd. along with The Three Degrees. They said he was the Fourth Degree after all, Chic Murphy that is.
—
Well there isn't one single solitary piece of information about this dude, nothing. Supposedly now he lives in Mallorca, but that's from an article about his daughter going to a TV program and the jury being interested more in knowing about his father, famous producer and manager of The Spice Girls. This guy was producer and manager of Roy anon! He jumped from Roy Jay to The Spice Girls! I'm not making it up, the AI has.
The Spice Girls are real, though. They always were.

>>40541784
The message mattered more than the messenger

>>40541715
Oh no, I'm actually against Ted in theory and practice. I don't think the Industrial Revolution was bad nor good. I'm just saying he is a figure that I remember from way before It was possible to álter everything, so he is real. Fernando Alonso is real, so was Jacques Lacan. My lived expierence tell me they are real. That's the only point I was trying to make, though I think this AI might have been programmed by a ted k inspired terrorist group, actually. But It could be a solitary Ted k inspired person, I don't know.
I think they think this will topple civilization and it might.
Anyways who is also real without a doubt? I'd say David Mitchell.

>>40541829
It makes no sense for society to collapse from something so banal and generally inoffensive, unless the idea is the unserious energy of Roy becomes so strong that we start mocking every part of life to the point that they lose all meaning and significance

>>40541789
This is supposedly a photo of him, Chic Murphy.
This guy gave money to Roy, then to The Spice Girls, then he banished.
Oh and this article is in spanish I'm afraid.
https://amp.ultimahora.es/noticias/sociedad/2018/05/17/1000891/carly-murphy-factor-les-intereso-mas-historia-padre.html

>>40541848
But not just Roy. Listen. Roy is just a little cog. It is surrounded by things, see? Who are surrounding other things, etc...
You already don't know what is real and what isn't. Have you encountered recently some funk band from the 70s that you like? They could be fake! If you don't remember remembering it before 2025, It could all be fake!
Violadores del Verso are also real, for example.

>>40541848
It's not clear if it will eventually colapse society, but it might. It would erode trust, and that's deeply fucked up. And I mean at the level of the economy.
But I don't know how to express It. I feel like you and most anons are thinking about it too directly in terms of consequences. I'd say we should try to separate reality from fiction. This would in a very real sense deny us that. I think it's going to be psychologically torturous.

>>40541892
>Separate reality from fiction
That's going to be wayharder than it sounds. Over the past 6ish years I've come to find out:
There are serious jokes in the Apollo landing narrative
Same with 911
The "holocaust"
The nature of money, central banking, and the federal reserve
Anything the general public believes about firearms
Same for race
The nature and causes of the world wars
The degree of government supplied meth abuse during modern wars.
Everything about 2020
The lack of credible primary sources for most of western history before the modern era (it's mostly spaghetti nigger wewuz fanfic.)

I guess my point is that most people, even the skeptics ITT on /x/ belive so many lies that they don't think to question that the odds on ever separating them are so close to zero you might as well not even bother.

The google keyboard replaced "holes" with "jokes."

Was that you Roy? Weird!

>>40541705

>>40541931
>There are serious jokes in the Apollo landing narrative
https://scottishritenmj.org/blog/masonic-astronauts

>>40541931
I won't comment on any of that except by saying this: this — if it's real — is worse than all of those things combined.

>The lack of credible primary sources for most of western history before the modern era (it's mostly spaghetti nigger wewuz fanfic.)
This, but in the near future.

>>40541978
I hope the Studio Ghibli trend dies. It is about the care that transpires in the animation, not the particular style of the still image.
Anyways yeah Ted fucking Kaczinsky could be a heavy inspiration behind a civilization colapsing computer virus. And that would be ironic on so many levels. Like Ironic from Alanis Morrisette who's also real. That's a good song. Kind of pasty.

>>40541892
He's the one who tells you to invest your stocks in waffles

>>40541872
Are you saying if two different viewpoints of a subject are extreme enough, they have a genuine push-pull effect on that target subject in reality?

https://spiceworld.fandom.com/wiki/SWTL.1994
Read the whole thing. This is an excerpt.
>Chris rose to the challenge with predictable enthusiasm, but rather than searching for singers, he began his quest by looking in clubs and pubs for girls with the “right” image. This may have looked suspiciously like an excuse to go out on the pull, but the Herberts, however, were more systematic, shifting through photographs from stage schools and dance academies in the field, so to speak, and as well as trawling the local night-spots, took to hanging out at stage doors, handing out flyers whenever West End shows held auditions for singers or dancers.
Dude. This is on the spice girls wiki. This is supposed to not suspicious? They weren't creeps because they were systematic about it, oh ok. Chic Murphy was with this dudes, he financed it at least partly.

>>40538631 (OP)
which of the gay sloptent docs is most watchable? i just wanna see if my posts appeared in them

>>40542065
That's a good example of how it could affect us.
>>40542081
No, I'm not saying that. To be quite honest I don't understand what you are saying, could you explain it a little more? Do you mean two viewpoints that are contradictory inside thr same person? I'm talking about fake backdated stuff everywhere and multiplying in the background while you sleep. That's what I'm talking about.
Captcha:WXNDX
!!!

>>40542033
For a while there's been variations from multiple individuals on the idea of a viral transhuman entity called "Zed/Zedd", they tend to be characterized as being hybrid of human and machine, with powers altering reality and biology, gaining power through war on humanity

>>40542146
I mean when two or more different individuals have viewpoints of something so wildly different that its collective perception in reality is altered beyond confines of their debate circle

>>40542140
The Perfect Citizen? None of them are watchable really. I don't think they are doing the material justice.

>>40538631 (OP)
The angle in that pic makes him look like a skinnier version of Jerry "The King' Lawler

>>40542159
Are you saying their viewpoints make the something they are talking about — an apple, let's say — actually, physically change? I think that's what you are saying. Personally I don't believe that.

>>40542146
He's so much thinner in this pic
And the arrows are shaped differently

>>40542191
>And the arrows are shaped differently
Yes, there is more than one prison uniform and they have different patterns. I haven't counted them, but I think at least two not counting the yellow one from pic rel.

>>40541020

AI dubbed the video in English or other language.

>>40539862

Yeah, the demon thing is not being focused on in the videos much. Infernal Internet Theory is true.

>>40542246
Yes but why is that insane? Oh well you're not even that anon. That 's a common practice nowadays I think.

>>40542261
But which entity did they bind to the identity of Roy whom they would fear so much?

>>40542282
:)
https://youtu.be/h3fNRxGCSe0
Shut it down Jim!!!

https://youtu.be/Scd-nNF9FZI
I said the joker is a wanted man
He makes his way all across the land
See him sifting through the sand
So I'll tell you all the story
About the joker and the thief in the night
https://youtu.be/Kr-fI01oA0c

https://youtu.be/wili2aSfb34

https://youtu.be/2HI_0jbWrYA

SLUPP Down slupps the Whisper-ma-Phone to your ear and the old Once-ler's whispers are not very clear, since they have to come down through a snergelly hose, and he sounds as if he had smallish bees up his nose. Now I'll tell you, he says, with his teeth sounding gray, how the Lorax got lifted and taken away... It all started way back... such a long, long time back...
Way back in the days when the grass was still green and the pond was still wet and the clouds were still clean, and the song of the Swomee-Swans rang out in space... one morning, I came to this glorious place. And I first saw the trees! The Truffula Trees! The bright-colored tufts of the Truffula Trees! Mile after mile in the fresh morning breeze.
https://youtu.be/s1tOC94L03U

>>40542435
Is this just barefaced derailing?

>>40542477
Yes.
I suspect he's being used to bind Astaroth to our reality in a way he cannot affect us

>>40542477
Yes, nothing here has anything to do with anything.
;)

Right?

>>40542514
On the contrary.

>>40541990
If I didn't think space was fake and gay before, holy moly.

https://youtube.com/shorts/YwVyfd33bmM?feature=shared

slither?!

This has become an autistic mess and I'm sorry that I ever participated in it.

>>40542709
Unrelaxed!

>>40542709
You'll be doing to tommorow.

>>40542709
Hey, weeeiird.

>>40542844
Tomorrow is written like this, with one m and two r's.
>>40538643
Not like this. Just to be clear.

>>40540358
Mods, put this guy in the hot lava and chicken machine

>>40540358
>You can imagine a big floygle BWC slapping against an iPad playing the Swelches commercial on loop. Weird!
this is pretty based if im being honest

>>40542812
>>40542690
HEY WEIRDOS!

>>40543250
Slither! Spook!

>>40538631 (OP)
>AI demon comedian
>look inside
>mental patient character comedian

https://cy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Jay
This is his welsh wikipedia.

>Undeterred, he went back again towards the end of the year, this time as the support act to the French crooner Charles Aznavour. There was no violence this time around, and he did make a couple of appearances on South African TV.
This Aznavour guy is famous as fuck, apparently. To me it sounds like a worse Jacques Brel.
https://youtu.be/0OrKMaeQUx0?si=Or8zatqMPCqkaEg3
Appearances on South African TV? Do we know something about that at all?
Also:
>Back in Britain again at the start of 1977, he was found and befriended by the agent Chic Murphy (who, as his personal manager, would be a crucial advisor and steadying influence in the years ahead)
Hmmm...
All of this is written here (we already knew about this article in general) https://www.comedy.co.uk/features/comedy_chronicles/roy-jay/#google_vignette

Someone added Roy Jay to the "British comedians" wiki. Two days ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_British_comedians&action=history
If this doesn't look weird to you I don't know what to say. Unrelaxed!
Slither!

>>>/tv/211549482

By the way, in that article they call that bbc1 show "The Main Event" instead of "The Main Attraction".
And someone was saying that Roy Jay appeared on comedian Jimmy Jones' autobiography, but I haven't seen anything that indicates that.

New developments

>>40544057
https://youtube.com/@beautifulbadandbizarre?si=yyR5RJ9i1N3nonke
If there’s anyone to know about Roy Jay it has to be this lady

>>40544057
That's the little and large appearance that we already know. Status Quo appeared also in the same episode:
https://youtu.be/V5SviLNsTCU?si=YWbnn7VZ8cAq2-Mc
Some guy saying he knew him! Well that is convincing isn't it? Also if it was so difficult to avoid how are there british people that don't remember him at all?

What's confusing about this is that the shills are arguing both sides. Of course he was real and existed and no this is all made up! They completely avoid the only interesting part, the back dates digital evidence that didn't exist...

/sci didn't know who R J Glauber was, by the way. Take of that what you will.
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/16696922
>>40544158
I mean if you believe in the backdating you are more in the "everything is made up" team, no? Admittedly this is a controversial topic and it is normal that people go to extremes: either everything is true without doubt or proof, or everything is AI generated even if it looks fine. The problem I see with that is that fake content already exists online, that's a fact. That makes me slither spookin' down the All is Fake Avenue sometimes. It's not for everybody, I get it. It's weird and unrelaxed. Weird!

>it's a demon
>it's AI
>it's the government
>it's the fucking floigan poster from /vr/
>it's a discord tranny
bros
i hate to tell you, but it's just a dead guy. and we are the ones responsible. we ruined this guy's legacy, what little he had, for a meme. it was funny at first but its gone too far now. we should all feel ashamed.

>>40544242
I know you're right, but I just can't stop slithering. It's weird.

>>40544242
>we should all feel ashamed
Don't tell me how to feel, please. If you have arguments, tell.
Do you actually remember him?

I'm a little new to the party here, but I've watched all the videos. Read everything I could find..

Is there ANY evidence of the backdating, the lack of Wikipedia, YouTube videos, Google search results, internet presence, etc prior to the initial /x/ post on April 4, 2025?

I'm not convinced one way or the other, but it seems this all hinges on whether anyone can definitively prove that Roy Jay did not exist prior to April 4, 2025.

Pic unrelated

>>40544330
you don't get it, anything You would accept as truth is susceptible to alteration.
like what, are you expecting screenshots of searches showing no results?

>>40542709
Me too anon. I attended a festival and it's been 5 days and I forgot about all this autism. I regret checking it out again

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q-Q-YmDnDU

>>40538631 (OP)
This is just the Mandela Effect for a new generation. We're all retreading the same grounds of discussion that was exhausted due to being unfalsifiable back on Fiona Broome's website 15 years ago. If there is a mechanism in existence that can erase the cornucopia from every piece of Fruit of the Loom merchandise and media, then it can produce a celebrity out of thin air by doing the same thing in reverse. It doesn't matter whether it's a demon doing it or a computer doing it or a demonic computer doing it. It doesn't matter if this is a natural glitch caused by overloading the universe with information, or whether its a mental disease caused by overloading our brains with microplastics. By the very nature of it, it can't be proved. We will never know how or why it happens. We who are affected by this sort of thing must thus accept that we cannot rely on causality being fixed and immutable. I could wake up tomorrow with four arms. I could turn my head and notice that I was in Bulgaria. I could blink and completely forget that 4chan ever existed. You have to accept it, or you will break yourself trying to resist it.

racist roy jay be like SPOOK! NIGGER!

>>40544219
I feel that there's some legitimate footage and possibly a real person.
I keep pushing the "lasagna cat" angle. Someone, probably anonymous and very rich and bored, is doing his little passion project and the scope of it defies explanation.
https://youtube.com/@lasagnacat?si=M9pzNUInSZ665wg7
Look at the last video...

Weird…. I hate weirdos.

>>40544712
That's fully possible. An eccentric rich nobody is the main financial backer of Wes Anderson's films

>>40545109
I suspect the fat guy in that one video and that one set of wired photos. He gives a king Herod vibe.

>>40545133
I also partially suspect it could be an alien using content of Roy to try and communicate with us

>>40538840
Bong here, I will try to seek out this autobiography from my city's library at some point this week. If it is true, it doesn't 100% disprove the AI theory, however. It could be that RJ was a real person whose identity has been hijacked. Alternatively, he could have been fabricated many years ago with the plan to wait until AI was competent enough to insert him into the timeline.

>>40545598
Based

all the
>bro hes a real dead comedian this is nonsense
shills have me convinced this entire debacle is an AI mandela effect

>>40545598
That's all I'm asking. A photo of a yellowed copy would set a lot of the weirdness to rest.

>>40545720
Yup. There's way too many shills in these threads for this to be nothing

>>40539635
That's what's got me confused. The different vocal tones/accents/speech patterns.

>>40546135
He could be like Hugh Laurie and capable of passing for either side of the Atlantic.
At least one of the videos sounds like a different person tho.

>>40544712
I don't get it, what's the lasagna cat angle you're talking about?

>>40538631 (OP)
>>40538631 (OP)
I don't know if this is related to anything, but a few months ago, there was a thread on /mu/ about music conspiracy theories, with the original post about an R&B singer named Robert Raimon Roy that goes by Rob Roy, which infamously disappeared the moment The Weeknd started going mainstream.
Pic related.

thread
>https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/124323239

A few of his songs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=immVoOs5NAQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9BUr0dasfQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQMYCoOLADQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2yaJyNZrUE

Roysissies, our response?
>>40546994

>>40544712
Ok that is possible. I know lasagna cat, but there the twist is the last video being incredibly well produced. Also the message there is clear: Garfield sucks. Is this the same, but about Roy Jay? But even if he's real, no one remembers Roy Jay, while Garfield is famous.
It is possible this is some joke by some rich guy, though.

>>40547044
>Roysissies
We have big cocks over here

>>40538631 (OP)
just in case someone hasn't gotten it yet: it doesn't matter if he is actually a memetic demon or not; they exist and they are all around us, specifics be damned.

>>40547304
Maybe it's not a dig at Roy as a person, but entertainment culture as a whole

>>40546339
I linked the channel. If you need it explained, super eye patch Wolf has a video on Garfield where he explains it in detail of you don't see it for yourself.

>>40547044
I think that this is part of the process. If this is designed to create chaos then this thread would be there to cause arguing.
>>40547643
IDK about demon in the traditional hell spawned devil sense, but I'm a simpler eregore or whatever sense, than yes.
>>40547997
I don't think that lasagna cat shitting on Jim Davis is the point. It's more about how something needlessly complex for no rational reason just happens without anyone taking credit.
Anonymous bored rich people doing extreme things for petty reasons is a thing. My local high school seems to have been built so a young incredibly rich man could play fantasy football with real children. This guy did it for 40 years and the school closed the year he retired. It's on the same level as having google time edit powers for your phantom comic and ai comment bots.

>>40538631 (OP)
Do we think there's any link between the ways Roy Jay and Max Stirner use the term "spook"

>>40548236
If that's the only thing connecting them, probably not

>>40538643
>while working a food van (and working naked from the waist down)
kek

>>40548215
That's why I think it's possibly a dig at entertainment culture collectively, who they push, how comparatively little it takes to ruin your career in it

>donkey's years

>donkey's years

It's the same mistake by two different comments of two different accounts. They are supposed to be British boomers, they shouldn't make that mistake.
(If you don't know, the correct use is "donkey's ears", meaning "years". It's rhyming slang.) This is the typical thing that would make an AI stumble.

>>40548298
People are trained like dogs. They aren't educated in your ivy towers. Its called folk paws for a raisin in this doggy dog world and your diamond dozen takes ink

>>40548343
What?

>>40548389
That's an AI comment meant to confuse you and sadly it worked

>>40548393
Could you explain to me exactly how it worked and what was it trying to accomplish? Also use donkey's ears in a sentence that makes sense.

>>40548393
What's the matter, swwetheart? Has the cat, perhaps, got your tongue?

Oh this is getting weirder and spookier.

>>40548458
>>40548403
It was meant to shut your brain off. It said "ivy towers" instead of ivory towers, "doggy dog" instead of "dog eat dog", "folk paws" instead of "folk tales"

>>40548537
And can you use any of those in a sentence?

>>40548547
Iridocyclitis

>>40544820
Exceedingly unrelaxed

>>40548525
@loolfactorie's comment isn't visible for me

However, it appears his comment was from 11 days ago. The other two comments are from a year ago.

>>40548930
Weird.

>>40548403
"I did that donkeys ago"
Sometimes you don't even have to say years

>>40548525

Bots

My name is Jonas.

>>40548241
I believe there is. In Stirner's view, a spook is a non-existent social construct that has power over the individual. Based on what we know of Roy Jay, he is by definition a "spook".

>>40548642
No more questions, you honour.
Captcha VKSSH

>>40549072
You meant: "Sometimes you don't even have to say ears".

>>40549072
In any case no one that isn't a bot would type donkey's years: most people don't use the idiom at all, and the few who do use it correctly.
It's not some upper class thing, on the contrary. It's trying to camouflage as your typical bloke.
It's the equilibrium between the literal and the metaphorical what's so disruptive to it: the idiom breaks the llm at the level of the word. It goes down in flames. It's still there, though, writhing.

>>40549516
FML

>>40549930
>>40549516
It says something completely different in mine, see pic related. I won't bother translating, but it is just a completely different story.
I Will also copy the AI text for reference here:
>La imagen muestra dos fotografías de Roy Jay, un actor y humorista español. En la imagen de la izquierda, se le ve con un traje oscuro y una camisa blanca, mientras que en la imagen de la derecha, aparece con un pijama de rayas rojas y blancas y un gorro de dormir a juego. Roy Jay fue un personaje popular en la televisión española durante los años 70 y 80, conocido por su humor y sus personajes cómicos. Además de su trabajo en la televisión, Roy Jay también participó en varias películas y obras de teatro.
>Roy Jay fue un actor español muy conocido por su humor y sus personajes cómicos.
Roy Jay is a spanish comedian now! Both photos are of him!
By the way, and without looking at anything, tell me who is Roy Jay Glauber.

>>40550002
Oh shit no! I asked again and that was the second time! Those are completely different versions! What?!

Now it doesnt give any text. Is this just Google interns trolling 4chan? Is this the fictional net colapsing on its own weight?

No seriously what the fuck was that.

https://www.registerguard.com/story/news/2018/12/21/man-sentenced-to-94-years/6555418007/
It seems there's another Perverted Prisoner named Roy Jay (Williams) in our midst

>>40550111
This is the part where you dance!
This is the part where you BOOGIE!
https://youtu.be/VovuaMxpRK4?si=NlGBR-7dFGflYGu1

you guys think the same thing happened with Plastic Love?

another beaner idgaf: https://youtube.com/shorts/b4VpVJvNAPM?si=_OW31a1KAX7SW6r8

lol the wiki article is now semi-protected, good luck editing it now!

>>40550116
Do you have a date for this article? It doesn't show on the page.

>>40550247
>The Sandman.
Consider me spooked! Spook!

>>40549516
>hello zepp.mp3

By the way, I posted a question on /sci about Who was Roy J Glauber, and they warned me because it wasn't science related. Take of that what you want.

>>40548525
>>40548930
They're referencing LSD
In the film The Producers, Hitler is played by a hippie named Lorenzo Saint Dubois (L.S.D)

>>40550314
I. Don't. Believe. It. For. A. Second.
You're making things up again. I didn't knew of that before, so I'm labelling it fake for the time being. I'm sorry if you're actually human and this bothers you, but I'm telling it how I feel it. I will check this yarn later.

>>40549516
Ok let's try to de-escalate the paranoia. Maybe there's something on this image that makes Lens glitch. Is there something weird with this image? Or just the Roy part?
Can you hack something with an image?

>>40550342
Solipsism is not the answer, it's weird

>>40550426
Oh no, don't get me wrong. Maybe it's true, but maybe it's fake. I do believe in the world, reality, however you call it. The Universe. And I believe all things I remember from before this thread started to be real (I'm being an optimist here). Idiocracy is real, for example. But The Producers? I don't remember that. It has Gene Wilder in it, I remember that chap from The Little Frankenstein or however the title is in english. He was also Willy Wonka in the OG Charlie and the Chocolate Factory movie. But this particular movie? No, I don't remember. So it could be AI generated and backdated from my point of view. Maybe not so from yours, maybe you knew the movie, maybe you watched a decade ago.
I'll finish the rant here, I think my point has been sketched sufficiently.

is there any proof at all about all that stuff being said of there being zero records of his existence prior to the creation of the thread cause ive gone through every thread and it seems to just be they said so with no real resolve

>>40550488
Man I envy you.

>>40550497
Nihilism to this degree is not to be envied

>>40550514
Not nihilism but blissful carelessness and ignorance. And I don't envy it exactly, it just feels nostalgic.

>>40550314
And by the way you are talking of the film inside the film right? Oh man this is trippy.

>>40550540
No, The Producers is a Mel Brooks movie from 1967, about the making of a bad-on-purpose play called "Springtime For Hitler"

watching, listening, learnng

>>40550580
Oh well a play inside a movie, then. That is a literary trope I mean. One that fits with this thread. A fiction inside a fiction. Think of Macbeth, for example:
https://youtu.be/OkLT6DGV-PE?si=8L3g-NXA12txEHD2
Mel Brooks is the legendary producer, he's real. Okay, okay, maybe this film is real. Is it good?
Captcha SAASS

>>40550584
The thing is if they can do hands. If they can do hands it's over. I think they can.

Beyond sleepy Gary, there's another Roy in Rick and Morty, the protagonist of the virtual reality game at blips & chips.

>>40550753
55 years
roy jay was 55 for 9/11
the winning score for our realities Roy Jay is to die crashing into the pentagon on a hijacked plane

we'll all play all the possible characters in this came
every single one - from the one you're playing right now, Anon, to Adolf Hitler to Helen of Troy
but the winning life? the special ending

you'll play Roy Jay dying on 9/11. what he sees then unlock the whole game. teach you everything you need to know about while this universe is evil and fake. he saw it all. he got the winning score and escaped

>>40550784
Roy Jay was 53 on 9/11 though. Cool theory nonetheless.
>>40550753
But I'm not going to lie this is weird. I remember this. I don't remember the name Roy attached to it, I'm just trusting you on that one.

I hate what this has become

>>40550998
Take it in the direction you want. You can slither left or right, forwards, backwards or in circles. Slither!
Spook! You can only spook down the street, though. That is mandatory by law.

If you change the wording, it'll give you a different answer.

This time, it thinks both people are Roy Jay. What's even more interesting though is the "visual matches".

The first one shows Robin Williams dressed similarly to our guy Roy Jay on the album cover and "The Laughter Show 02 03 1985" video. I personally think he sounds like Robin Williams in the Bob Monkhouse video and I know I'm not the only one of that opinion.

Do you remember Viking Roy? I watched all of these a few days ago and this wasn't there

>>40551217
roy jay was in the Residents

One possibility is that the guy who owns this channel is in on it. The song "spooky love" wasn't there either and none of the videos made about him in the last couple weeks show any of this footage, not instead repeat the same free videos. Also the striped pajamas have been replaced on Wikipedia.

>>40551128
Interesting. But that description fits with Roy Jay's wikipedia. Mine didn't at all.
Well maybe it's just an AI fuckup, those happen every once in a while.
>>40551217
>>40551258
Those things were there, as well as the police skit. And the imagen with the pijamas wasn't on wikipedia, it was always the lp front cover.

Reddit thread full of shills claiming to remember Roy, same stories all around about him being a playground fad

>>40550002
>Roy Jay Glauber
If I remember right he's a quantum physicist I think

>>40551494
>stories all around about him being a playground fad
I actually think there's something to this, but not to imply he was a real person that kids talked about, moreso a character that was made up for it and now he's being manifest as a "real" person somehow

>>40550064
>Is this just Google interns trolling 4chan?
Why are you people so fucking retarded? This is clearly google AI going rogue

>>40551892
When I first saw Roy there was a sense of familiarity to his face even though I had no idea who he was, his whole schtick is very reminiscent of esoteric British comedy as well, he’s like a mighty boosh character. I mean he is just a middle aged white man but still I feel like if he is AI there is something going on there that has made his face feel as if you have seen it before

>>40550257
>>40550247
Tell him that his lonesome nights are over
>>40550753
https://youtu.be/78gt7pfjlCU
>>40551258
Hey Mr skeltal is back, thank you Mr. Skeltal
>>40549474
>any suggestion of anything in these threads
>NOOOO ITS NOTHING HES NOTHING IS FAKE ITS AI ITS NOT REAL
Why are they so afraid of him?

>>40552027
Maybe he really is a kind of sex demon, but instead of causing physical sensations, he changes beliefs and morals

The original image "roy_jay_pjs.jpg" on the original thread had a unix timestamp of Mar 25 2025 20:16:23 GMT+0000, but the exact same image with the exact same filename was seen in this article
>https://www.comedy.co.uk/features/comedy_chronicles/roy-jay/

Supposedly written on September 22nd 2024...

Graham McCann, who wrote the article might've also written the original post about Roy being a demon. Graham is a legit author, but is also likely a Glowie, (Operation mockingbird)

>>40551494
playground fad detail is the most creepy thing about this
how repeated it is - it makes me think of elsagate

Hey weirdos!

>>40550622
Tell me you're AI without telling me you're AI

>>40538631 (OP)
solar plexus clown gliders

It is more plausible that rogue google AI hacked into CERNs LHC and has done some shadilay mandela effects rather than this being some indians at google trolling /x/

>>40552387
Haven't heard of that one in a while, kek.

>>40552571
All is according to God's plan, do not forget the righteousness of the positive aspect of this reality. This is meant to try and confuse you, a ruse of the negative to gather more fear and panic for its purpose.

>>40538631 (OP)

SLITHER!!

>>40552998
Thanos is off his crack!

>>40553106

UNRELAXED!!

>>40553148
Wow, weird. Well... Give us the source. You want your place in Royhalla, don't you?

>>40553148
dollars to donuts, that's a masonic ring

>>40551900
I think so too, anon. But sometimes you've got to contemplate other possibilities. And I was talking about the Google lens results concretely.

>>40552172
This is very weird. But personally I know Next to nothing about unix timestamps, so I can't quite decide.
I'll just say are you sure Graham is an actual author? I'm not denying he is real neccessarily. I'll search the operation you mention (I remember reading about it vaguely).

>>40552998
>>40553148
Hi weirdo!
>>40553188
Hmmm. Can't it just be an engagement ring? Maybe?

>>40552998
>>40553148
Where did you get these photos, anon?

>>40552172
>>40552172
>The original image "roy_jay_pjs.jpg" on the original thread had a unix timestamp of Mar 25 2025 20:16:23 GMT+0000
That's because that's the date thread #0 was posted:
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40084357/
The original attempt to kick-start all this, but a sex demon didn't catch on so the time traveling demon narrative was used for thread #1.
This also proves Roy Jay existed before April 4, except that it could also have been planted by time traveling Roy Jay in June 3 (because nobody could see thread #0 until June 3rd, the "backdate".)
Captcha: MT R0 A 8

>>40552622
Of course Goan Catholics would try to twist this into being about God

In the book "The King in Yellow", theres a short story about a "coffin worm" and also time travel as well, right before the iconic King in Yellow (aka Roy!)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_death_worm
This is what a coffin worm apparently is. Scroll down under the two images and look at the name of the person who first wrote about it. Freaky.

>>40554091
Also this is interesting..

>>40554104
>>40554091
Maybe Hastur warps people's minds into aligning more with the wants of elites

Back on /x/ for the first time since that "real alien" shit went down.
Here from the Perfect Citizen video.

What the fuck is even this.

>>40554091
I mean it’s fun to shove the yellow king in all sorts of stuff but he lives in Carcossa. That’s one of the few things that are known about him. Also he wears yellow.
This does not fit with Roy.

>>40554147
One time in the 80s there was a comedian in the uk. He slithered. He spooked.
Or there might not have been and it’s a retrospective addition to reality by MYSTERIOUS POWERS.

>>40554104
That is also a play within a book. One that drives you mad.
>>40554285
Roy does wear yellow in one of the videos, but other than that and the Roy J=Roi Jaune conection, there's nothing more that links the two, as far as I know.

i just watched the perfect citizen video and when i went to bed i dreamed that i was dressed up as roy jay in front of a mirror and i kept going "SPOOK! SLITHER!" uncontrollably the entire time and when i woke up my laptop was opened to an image of him. that fucking thing really is a solar plexus clown glider.

>>40554147
A big nothing burger

>>40554334
This u?

>>40552571
>>40551900
It's not rogue, if Google's AI were rogue then it would be generating other individuals, not just Roy, and of more extreme content as well.

this shit has got me thinkin
this guy's like a new creepypasta
a nu-creepypasta if you will

>>40552998
>>40553148
>new roysidue of the highest quality
>nobody is freaking out
it's dead, boys.

>>40554637
Only because we didn't say the trigger words

>>40552998
Where'd that one come from?

>>40554637
To be honest I've been dulled by the weirdness at this point. Unrelaxed!
>>40554083 I'm this anon, still unanswered. These anons that drop things and go away... Weird...

everybody is saying that the comments on the videos are AI, but are people forgetting that british people just sound retarded?

>>40554147
antihauntology mate

>>40553148
with starting material as good as this picture
why is the story 4chan came up with so gay

>>40538631 (OP)
bigfoot if he gay

It now giges me this, I'll translate:
>A la izquierda, Sean Pertwee, un actor inglés conocido por sus papeles en cine y televisión, incluyendo "Gotham" y "Event Horizon".
>A la derecha, Roy Jay, un actor y cómico estadounidense que fue muy popular en la década de 1970, conocido por su personaje "The Sleepwalker" (El Sonámbulo).
The first paragraph I won't translate, it's about other actor ( Who I don't know anything about). I suppose is the "correct" one. Anyways, here's the second:
>To the right, Roy Jay, an American actor and comedian that was very popular in the seventies, known for his character "The Sleepwalker".
It's weird because it keeps being mistaken. All that we know is that Roy Jay was a norwegian comedian famous in the UK during the 80s with his Spook! and Slither! catchphrases. It's either that or a demon that looks like that or an AI that looks like that
Normally this thing works. It has replaced the search engine de facto. Why does it make it fail, this image? Is it this image?

>>40554901
Look at the last name on the second paragraph in that image. Who's that?

>>40554995
chic from the band chic

>>40555001
No not at all why are you so obviously derailing this always happwns when I bring up CM. Why?

https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40144369/#q40151648
This post from the second thread is pretty cool I think.

>>40555030
It won't harm living things? Is that what that means? I don't know if I believe it.

>>40555023
its chic from the band chic
you're the solar plexus clown gilder faggot

>>40555030
the narrative in the original thread about how he went from pyjamas and waking up to a prison break is kino
nothing afterwards will spoil that

>>40555100
There's not even a Chic on the band chic.

>>40555100
Are you gone now or what? There's no Chic on Chic, the band. The list of band members is completely different.
>>40555023
I must also underline this.

>>40555116
the leader singer of the band Chic is called Ian Chic

>>40555200
No? Not at all?
To be absolutely clear I don't know the band. But Google and wikipedia say otherwise. That's really all I'm saying.

>>40555200
And by the way, it's "lead singer".

Reading that book "Now this is a very true story" on pages 52-53 it does talk about this guy, even referencing his Schweppes ad. Sounds like a nobody that stole jokes, did crack and died a bum somewhere in nowheresville in 2007. So I don't understand the whole "if you prove he existed before April 2024" thing I see alot of people talking about. So to sum up, a struggling nobody comedian/entertainer with 40 views on his videos from the 1970s and 80s resurfaces because some turboautist made this story up about not finding a wiki article before or something. If this guy was remembered only by like a few thousand people up to a few months ago why would he have a wikipedia page? There are wiki pages of past Kings and Princesses or semi-famous mathematicians and physicists that have the bare minimum information, like 1 paragraph about them, and you expect a bum from the 80s to have a full wiki page? What a retarded concept, I'd rather hear a drooling cunt talk about flat earth than lay eyes upon this dogshit creepypasta again.

>B-B-But the names of the commenters
If you weren't a retard that went online 3 years ago you would know about Google+, legacy account migrations with system generated names etc. If the boomers that felt nostalgic about jay ray didn't change them it's common to have such names it's not da AI

>>40555332
>I read this is a book so he exists! 4realz!
Your comments reads so weirdly. So you were just reading this book that mentions Roy Jay? Why if you are convinced he's real? Or you were just casually reading it and stumbled upon the part about Roy Jay?
You shouldn't be so convinced after reading two pages anyhow>>40549516
Also reverse search this image.

>>40555216
everyone remember Ian Chic

>>40555379
No. Just no.

>>40555332
>"Now this is a very true story"
Now this is a very fake book.

>>40538883
>glowies make fake album to help with his retro-seeded fake personality
>retard buy it like a fucking retard
>proceed to call other retarded

>>40538883
>be me, time warping demon
>create a failed comedian for shit and giggle
>the dumb humans have no idea, not even the slightest hint
>they didn't even check the old sage archive for 4chan, was to lazy to edit that one
how did that old fart Solomon bind us again? if humans are this dumb, bet I could beat him

>>40555378

No I wasn't reading it by accident, of course I stumbled on this thread, saw the book being mentioned after a while, read it and that's it.
Look, I'm as schizo as one can be, with mandela effects that am convinced happened to me blah blah blah but this thread seems so stupid to me. It's not a mandela type conspiracy because there aren't people that used to remember him and now doesn't exist or the opposite. That guy was a nobody (at least to us, 50+ people might remember him if you reference him to them and a few thousand could probably remember him off the top of their head). So what is this thread about exactly? I also saw the reverse image search others posted here, so the AI says gibberish and confuses everything so that means this guy is a time travelling demon? kek Free to use AI can't perform even the most basic functions other than regurgitate the most mainstream shit and you base your reality around what this hunk of code spews instead of thinking it might be an AI error, especially when it says different shit to each one of you, that means the AI probably still processes data and will in a few months say it is a creepypasta or dimensional jumping conspiracy theory if the same delusions with this name are posted daily about Roy Jay.

If it is what you say it is fine, I'll accept the possibility as with many other things I've accepted as plausible. But ultimately, if it's not, you will have created this reality for yourself and others. Other people in the future will believe it's real because AI will pick up all the schizo info and project it to a past human and create a fake identity and mythos around him, and that will be your creation, not the time travelling demons'. You yourself might be unwillingly helping, to alter history itself.

>>40555397

Ok, a book that was written in 2011 and bought by a few old people who cared about an old washed up comedian for some reason = the book is fake. Do you have a single proof otherwise?

>>40538631 (OP)
Roy Jay was spookpilled. Damn glowniggers got him.

>>40555490
I was just mocking the title. Relax. All you type sounds disingenuous. Do you actually remember Roy Jay? Do you know Who Chic Murphy is?

This whole ordeal has become unrelaxed. We had a small, dedicated group of autists digging up legit info, and this group has now all but disappeared over the last couple weeks, replaced with unironic broccoli hair zoomers and spics whose first exposure to Roy was through the gay youtube vids; all of whom treat old information as mindblowing new discoveries. It's created a circular discussion with overtly low IQ discourse where any tidbit of meaningful data we uncover is dismissed as fake because it doesn't conform to le spoopy AI demon theory. That's what you retards want: a creepypasta, not to figure out what actually happened.

I'm the guy who bought the vinyls, news clipping, emailed a bunch of YT users, got the Radio Times scans, etc. I was also here from the very first thread. I've posted all of this, and conclusively proven that Roy is not a fake AI invention. To state otherwise is to deny all logic and good faith argumentation. Despite this, retards continue to force a narrative that's damaging to the truth. Maybe he's a demon that can alter reality, and if he is, nothing can be proven; but he's not "fake" in the sense that Google just made him up. He is not purely AI. That is conclusively retarded. I've said it from the very start: this dude existed, but for whatever reason, he's been the victim of AI tampering with his web data. There is absolutely something strange going on, but this backrooms slenderman tier faggotry is weird unrelaxed, fake and most of all gay.

All I want to say is, if anybody who knew Roy ever reads this, I'm sorry for indirectly contributing to your loved one becoming a retarded meme; just know that I did my best to prevent it. I was charmed by Roy's story and persona, and I wanted him to be remembered for his actual life, not a bunch of lies. I spent real money and hours of time towards this end, and I hope that counts for something.

This disco has gotten too weird. It's unrelaxed. I'm spookin' on out of here.

>>40555520
Fair. Does it sound disingenuous because I disagree with it? I don't remember him no, but answer me this. Why should I know him? If he was a forgotten entertainer from the 70-80s era why should I have even heard his name before? If right now I throw a name at you from a niche comedian of the 50s for example, that only performed in bars, does it mean that his irrelevance on the internet will make him a time demon if I so please?

>>40555591
agreed.
but this is one of those cases where whatever retarded and unimaginative slop gets spread over it, the original character and his real life (and anomaly of his six month popularity) will always overshadow what people come up with

roy jay has been memed in the past and the original videos and story retain their charm. no one of the zoomer slop vids has more views that the monkhouse clip and we'll always have that

as a wise man once said "its roy jay, its always roy jay"

>>40555591
>conclusively proven
No. I'm sorry but no.

>>40555381
next you'll be telling us it wasnt Ian and the Gang

>>40555630
reddit

>>40555381
No one appointed you as curator of Roy

>>40555332
There's books on the moon landing totally happening as well.

Chic Murphy, though.

>>40555686
Extremely low IQ comment, not because of the moon landing thing but because the only relation between the two occurrences in your mind was "book (the word) + real/not real hehe"

Literal ape

>>40555639
Your reality isn't on point.

>>40555651
Are you the appointer?

>>40555651
And I wasn't even writting about Roy there! Do better!

>IT’S AN AI GONE ROGUE BUT IT’S ONLY HYPER FOCUSED ON THIS ONE GUY IT MADE UP AND ISNT MAKING MILLIONS

>>40555909
Who are you quoting? They're really cutting the corners on some of you. Stop beating around the bush and produce more Roy Jay content, specially long videos that somehow were always there. Off you go!

>>40555555

>>40555955
Everyone who still pushes the “AI gone rogue” narrative. If that were true there would be possibly thousands of AI invented people with backstories by now.

>>40540157
>we
who is this "we" you're talking about?
as far as I know, the people who post those evidences are just unconfirmable rando on the internet, might as well glowies or part of the AI
hell, they could even make fake things just for shit and giggle

>>40555909
>Spike Milligions

>>40555833
Ian Chic Murphy though

>>40555974
There are.

>>40555975
>for shit and giggle.

>>40541313
Pajama party <3

>>40555975
you could buy roy's albums too if you werent a poorfaggot
>but da AI made da vinyls an sheeeit
yeah bro, the AI broke out, took over a manufacturing plant in the UK and started pumping out copies of vinyls and had a dozen chinese laborers shidding and farding on them to make them look old and dusty, then sent them off to old women and record store owners to distribute on ebay and discogs. or, you're just retarded, and roy was a real guy and this entire thing is a shitpost/malicious attempt to convince human cows that a guy didn't exist in spite of four decades of physical evidence that he did.

>>40556062
>yeah bro, the AI broke out, took over a manufacturing plant in the UK and started pumping out copies of vinyls and had a dozen chinese laborers shidding and farding on them to make them look old and dusty, then sent them off to old women and record store owners to distribute on ebay and discogs.
Why... Why is this not posible?

>>40556075
possible =/= probable.

>>40556081
Never said that. So you admit it's possible?

>>40556095
sure, it's "possible" in the same way that it's "possible" reality is presided over by a giant neon purple bear named mr. hugglystuff. literally anything is possible. feeding your arguments based on "but it cooould happen brooo" rather than observable evidence is called delusion. ergo, you're delusional.

>>40556095
Brother, your retarded argument is what makes people run away from threads like this. People try to "prove" something whether it's something that can be proved or not, but they try even within the schizorealm/reality and you shoehorn yourself in with "Muh universe could be a giganigga carrying us his balls" or something.
No one likes you and you end up talking with the same 3 schizos in an endless conversation because each one of you just want your "thing" to be real regardless of how improbable it is.
You can try a fanfic discord or fan wiki for creepypastas, no need to argue with people over something you will never change your mind over, since your "theory" can't be disproven anyway.

>>40556109
Not in the same way. Not the same at all. Observable evidence must be interpreted. I'm positing this concrete theory, not any strawman position you are trying to burden me with.

>>40556145
What was your point again?

>>40556154
Nothing, I just forgot this tab open in the background kek. I'm out anyway, just wanted to try to "save" someone from this retardation samsara. Sorry if I was aggressive, have a good night

>>40556147
pure diaengenuous shitposting. someone gave you overwhelming proof that this guy had a physical presence in the form of physical objects (which you can purchase yourself), in tandem with a similarly overwhelming network of information ranging for newspapers to articles and books. you have exactly 0 argument against any of this, so you just stamp your foot and say "i want to believe he wasn't real". that's fine, you can choose to be retarded, but don't act like anyone is strawmanning you when they're presenting you with the exact things to shutdown your 20 IQ "theory" and you keep being retarded anyway.

>>40555992
I haven't forgotten this idiotic botlike response, by the way, I'm just in awe of it.
>>40556169
>overwhelming proof
I think underwhelming evidence is more fitting. It's two vinyls, a magazine and newspaper clippings. Stopped reading there.

>>40543774
I'm not gonna let these retarded YouTubers gaslight me into thinking he was a real, well-known comedian at one point. Fuck them, I'm not crazy. Now come slither *hithering motion*

>>40556169
Do you also think Chic is from the band Chic, Who has no Chic on It?

>>40556227
its Chic from the band Chic
retarded AI spammer

>>40556199
let's see, proof that Roy Jay existed:
>videos on youtube dating back 17 years with no signs of being created by AI except one single video a guy uploaded a year ago (which was a copy of an older video) run through an AI upscaler
>guy who uploaded most of the vids (Lee G Crime) was contacted and responded, and also posts on the FB page
>full episodes of the Laughter Show that the vids were clipped from were posted by an anon
>another anon buys three separate vinyls all with wear, tear and signatures consistent with real material and uploads timestamped photos -- one vinyl even contained a free ticket to one of Roy's shows with a time and location that corresponded to a real Cabaret club
>further posts a news clipping taken from a major publication
>another anon links to the british newspaper archive where you can find dozens of more entries for Roy
>has a purported daughter who posts on his FB page with pictures of herself and her brothed, both of whom look like Roy
>no less has a significant number of old candid photos posted on FB, all of which look completely consistent with a typical 80s camera shot
the list goes on. now, your evidence for him not existing:
>trust me bro
if you don't simply shut down, i no doubt imagine your next line of defense will be to say something like "but those vids could've been backdated!". sure, except that harkens back to the "AI tampering" theory, which is plausible and has its own supporting evidence. what has 0 evidence is the claim that he didn't exist at all.

>>40556259
Yawn. Don't bots get tired, and then go to bed, and then dream of electric sheep?
>>40556233
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chic_(band)
There's no Chic in Chic. Who's Chic Murphy?

>>40556259
>your next line of defense will be to say something like "but those vids could've been backdated!".
Oh no that's my main theory.

>>40556289
>shuts down
don't worry, you can continue being a disengenuous tard. anyone reading this conversation can tell who's being authentic and who's being misleading. the only thing that matters is posterity, so by all means, continue making your own argument look silly and misinformed.

>>40556299
You listed evidence that I don't consider conclusive. You can calm down about It.

>>40556302
it doesn't matter if you consider it conclusive, it is. you have no evidence, you have no argument, you don't matter. cope.

>>40556308
It doesn't matter that you consider it conclusive, it is not. Sneed.

>>40556320
is it time to cope already?

>>40556321
Who's Chic Murphy?

>>40556295
>>40556259
The online evidence was unavailable when the initial post happened.
Most likely the topic of Roy Jay was shadow banned by the same entity that made the post. The weird bot comments were real as well. If the goal was to test a factor of chaos then the details don't matter, just the fact that you're both arguing contradictory and yet somehow equally wrong positions.

>>40556338
>you're both arguing contradictory and yet somehow equally wrong positions.
And what would the correct position be?

>>40556323
British talent manager and investor. I know, crazy that everyone's whole life isn't up on the internet

>>40556351
Can you give me some info on him?

>>40556353
No. You do understand that those people you're trying to gather intel on were like 60 years old in the late 90s early 2000s right? You can't find info on every person on earth retarded zoomerbrain, there are probably 100 other people in the world called Chic Murphy that don't show up at all on Google

>>40556366
>No.
Ok.

>>40556343
That everything is real.

>>40556372
Even the propaganda?

>>40556323
leader singer of the glamrock band Chic

>>40556382
Lmao

>>40556370

>>40556393
That photo slays, I'm not going to lie. Is it him though?

>>40556403
>>40541851
The scuffed hairline seems to match but not sure

>>40556375
Especially that

>>40556422
>Seems to match.
>>40541851
You mean with this photo here right? To me they look like two different boomers. I don't think he's either one of them. Those are the only two photos I've seen that claim to depict him. Isn't that weird?
But thank you for responding, anon. Have a good day or night.

>>40556460
Are you Stalin by any chance?

>>40556422
Actually, let me retract that: that can't be him, because that photo comes from a 2011 obituary, and he's alive in 2018 according to this article.
https://www.ultimahora.es/noticias/sociedad/2018/05/17/1000891/carly-murphy-factor-les-intereso-mas-historia-padre.html
So there's one single photo of him. Maybe it isn't a photo of him, how would we know?

Okay. Can someone please watch this video? Just tell me if it lets you watch it. It is blocked in my country (Spain). It is a video of a spanish show. Make it make sense. Supposedly his daughter is there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6TaECmDERg

Maybe this is her?
https://youtu.be/-y-KHRMgjaI?si=xUfK4_Edfa0QwK8u

>>40556295
These fucking shills don't even come up with an argument for the backdating, they only resort to calling the people who mention it retarded like a bunch of stubborn mules. Also, there was a tv guide that showed what was on British tv from December 1983 - February 1984. Roy supposedly performed on the little and large show then, but the tv guide shows he didn't.

>>40556505
Hmmm

>>40556562
That sounds weird doesn't it?

>>40556475
No, you may proceed at whatever pace you like.

>>40556577
Kek. I'll rush to the gulag then.

>>40556574
It is weird in a classic creep millionaire/billionaire kind of way. It is interesting to be honest and a bit weird for sure but to me it seems more like I'm looking into a very wealthy man, possibly with long lineage way back. You know those types of families that are in the dark and they are just wealthy through generational wealth, working with governments etc.

>>40556015
The goldfish here don't even remember the changes to Roy's exposure incident, like its location and body part changing, even the year bouncing between 1983 and 1986.

kek

>>40556603
Jesus they like can't talk like normally like...
It sounds like a shady real character, yes. That would be very good for a fake character, though. Not a lot to invent.
They don't even know how to spell his name, for crying out loud! There is more information about Thomas Pynchon!

>>40556628
Oh so they dumped him basically? Huh.

https://youtu.be/pokjWiLbXps?si=ayjJ4UdfHUXn9tHd
Has anyone noticed Roy Jay is basically an one man minstrel show without the Blackface?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stump_speech_(minstrelsy)

>>40556675
This is very interesting anon! He claimed to have copied the slithering from a southafrican gardener, so there's that.
>The stump speech was a precursor to modern stand-up comedy.
Stand-up comedy has racist origins? I wasn't aware of that.

What in the flying fuck? This is the most bizarre thing I've seen from here in a minute. I have a long history on the internet, yet I've never heard of this dood until today, when I suddenly got caught up on the lore. Could some fag really have been retroactively written into the space-time fabric? And if the timeline did get spliced, how would we even know, except by noticing things seem vaguely off? Man, such a mindfuck.

>>40550383
Nobody gonna address this? At all?

>>40556964
I have the podcast on Spotify. Do you know at what time they start actually discussing Roy Jay?

>>40557105
PODCAST SLOP WHO GIVES A FUCK THESE RETARDS ARE JUST RELAYING THE YOUTUBE SLOP

>>40557142
promise this shit is all slop and you faggots are the ones who run it shilling it on here roll back to the broccoli hair zoomers

>>40557148
mad about roy jay are you mate?

>>40557160
no theres just been enough slop made about him and two fags serving up slop on a school tray to all the retarded zoomers means nothing

Wikipedia has been updated

>>40557310
top lel

>>40557310
is roefi here a a wagie in his wagieless cagie for wikipedia and edits articles all day or is this his first?

everyday I'm shuffling

>>40557403
Unequivocally unrelaxed

>>40557310
Cringe. Next is when the normies storm to it and ruin it like they did with the backrooms. And since this actually seems to be a real paranormal phenomenon that changes with observation, the actual research is going to be diluted now with 50,000 zoomers spamming the search engines with RJ fan content. Disgusting.

>>40557502
all good things must get raped to the bone by retarded zoomers.........

>>40557310
>conspiracy theory
that all but confirms the supernatural is at work.

>>40557502
I guess it's like the observation effect in quantum mechanics?

>>40557310
Stephen Johnson. You couldn't come up with a more generic AI name if you tried. It's like the AI are creating other AI personas to keep reinforcing the notion that Roy is real and didn't just slither into our consciousness after the first threads started happening.

new thread? wheres baker

>>40538631 (OP)
can someone link me to "Spooky Love" please I can't find it

>>40552998
This didn't exist before.

>>40557310
https://lifehacker.com/entertainment/what-people-are-getting-wrong-this-week-roy-jay-the-comedian
something smells fishy about this article.
reads like a chatgtp prompt lol

>>40556062
Or.... some people just printed out the "album cover", put it on an actual album, and taken a photo of it...

>>40558719
You must not have been in the thread where the pics were posted because it wasn't just the """album cover""" faggot, it was detailed pics of everything including the signature and the vinyl itself

>>40558339
https://web.archive.org/web/20231113191323/https://lifehacker.com/author/stephenjohnson

One of the articles he "wrote" was about how the dead internet theory definitely isn't real

Either a glowie, or just a boomer who found out about Roy

>>40558762
So? If someone has the resources to manipulate the dates on mentions of Roy, they have the resources to make a fake album and make it look real.

new thread
>>40558814
>>40558814
>>40558814

>>40558792
you've lost the plot bro