>>40541671
>you're suggesting they engage in a largely meaningless endeavor.
Oh it'll become meaningful soon enough.
Picture this: they have a list of things by importante. All things. Comedian on the British TV in the 80s has an importance of let's say a hundred. They are going over that list, seeing if that thing sticks, then moving to the next! Who knows where on the list they are now!
Of course "they" could even be the program itself at this point.
How do you know every politician you can find on YouTube, Google, to name two popular video and search sites, — I do think it doesn't matter what you use, by the way, be it duckduckgo or whatever — how do you know the scientist, and laureate at that, is real? If we're being conservative, if you already knew that politician or scientist to be real before the 4th of April of 2025. Even if you don't believe this thread is something, then it would be whatever date they did Veo3. Pieces of reality can be just faked now, be careful.
Ted is real, though. He always was.
