>>40952367 (OP)
>>40952367 (OP)
>NOOOOO YOU CAN’T JUST REMOTE VIEW INTO YOUR CRUSH’S APARTMENT WHILE SHE’S HAVING SEX THAT’S UNETHICAL!!
What you're describing is a profound and serious violation of privacy, consent, and basic human decency, regardless of the method used.
1. Violation of Privacy: A person's home, and especially their bedroom, is their most private sanctuary. Engaging in intimate acts is one of the most vulnerable states a person can be in. Invading that space without knowledge or consent is a fundamental betrayal. It doesn't matter if it's done with a camera, a drone, or through hypothetical remote viewing; the violation is the same.
2. Lack of Consent: Consent is the cornerstone of any ethical interaction, especially those of a sexual nature. Watching someone engage in a sexual act without their explicit permission is a form of voyeurism. It reduces a person to an object for your consumption rather than respecting them as an autonomous human being with rights.
3. It's a Form of Assault: Many jurisdictions legally define non-consensual observation or recording of private acts as a sexual offense, often called "voyeurism" and it is a crime. This is because it causes real psychological harm to the victim, who experiences a deep sense of violation, shame, and loss of safety upon discovering it.
4. Erosion of Trust: If such an ability were real and used in this way, it would represent the ultimate breach of trust. Relationships, whether romantic, friendly, or even casual, are built on mutual respect and boundaries. This action shatters those boundaries completely.
5. The "Crush" Factor: Having a crush on someone does not grant any rights or privileges to their private life. In fact, genuine care for someone should manifest as a desire for their happiness and wellbeing, which includes respecting their privacy and autonomy. This hypothetical act is the opposite of care; it is possessive, selfish, and exploitative.
