Thread 281703374

I love both Oriko Mikuni and Madoka Kaname.

maguca

Did nothing wrong!

Also, I love alternative interpretation of her in TTS: https://archiveofourown.org/works/777002/chapters/11228542

>She wants to kill Madoka
Oriko deserves her one thousand years of death by Madoka.

>>281706547
what's going on there

>>281706695
Yuritroon is having a melty I think

>You killed her?
I did, and not a day goes by where it doesn't haunt me. But if I had to do it again, I would. As a daughter of the Mikuni household, I have a duty to this world, and I will not let anyone prevent me from carrying it out.

>>281707914
that's her skirt

my lower legs feel cold
annoying
morning homu

>>281707888
Absolutely NOTHING WRONG!

All megucas are LESBIANS

also fucking nausea is back
ah well
if things gradually on average get better thats good

>>281708775
…according to the mentally ill.

>>281709244
So you, Kyoukojogger?

>>281709685
who

do I buy this devil homu for 50

>>281710171
I have her at home, waiting for after I move to unbox her though.
50 is nothing for me so it was worth it, unless you’re poor I’d say go for it anon

Mogged

Every meguca is canonically thalassophobic. I mean, every normal person already knows this because normal girls don't go swimming. The authors didn't even thought about the possibility of western ocean-loving shizos interpreting the chacarcters that way. There is no ocean in the anime in the first place. Only in gachaslop pandering to the mentally ill swimtards do megucas go to a beach. Ocean is consistently depicted as a horror through the imagery of Uhrmann, Octavia, and Walpurgisnacht flooding the destroyed city. Sayaka's arc shows the dangers of succumbing to the degeneracy of swimming by drowning in her labyrinth. In the 12th episode Madoka commits Total Oceanigger Death which is why Rebellion takes place in the desert.

>>281708775
Most likely only some of them are or don't see lesbianism as something bad.

>>281706695
I don't know, looks like Madoka doing one thousand years of death that's why i posted it, lol.

Some "people" got mindbroken by this image. I wonder why.

I run away from the boogieman. He is under the bed and want to eat us.

>>281712082
I could see this be an actual post from a reddit yuritard

>>281713585
All I see is one guy spamming it and calling it gay for some reason

The 'cord sends its regards

>>281716287
And all i see is "people" not being able to ignore that image. Like it's always needed to be replied by someone, it has been basically a "seed post" so far.

homu figure bought
sad it was the only decent one for sale
There was also this but meh
Homu lacks in figurines

>>281716470
What 'cord are you talking about? if this thread has been almost empty the last hours.
>The 'cord army of 1 person
Topkek.

>>281718500
You're part of the 'cord too. The schizo mind sees a 'cord behind all phenomena

>>281718855
Me too? Holy shit, it would be amazing to see through the mind of schizos here. Imagine being able to see their imagination, the fantastic and false world they think is real.

>>281718046
I replied to your post not the image itself though

healthy people never know how good they have it till its too late

Big boobs

>>281721616
big boobs you say?

>>281721670
Madoka got mogged hard. I want to drink all the milk from those mamis.

I hope to have a lot of gems when Tart comes out in Exedra. Really one of the best magical girls.

"Seed post is a common compound word"

Secret

Have the threads on /a/ calmed down yet

Anyway
Homura did nothing wrong. Not a single thing

What if the black cat Amy was Homura of another timeline? That would make Homura easier to understand.

>>281725254
I choose rape hug moemura.

>>281725579
Based

nice
Kaiten will being more cool figs
but I dont get the chance to buy in person often and I prefer that alot

>>281727283
>Kaiten will being more cool figs
What do you mean anon? I can't understand.

>>281727526
homuras for my shelf

Der mächtigste König im Luftrevier ist des Sturmes gewaltiger Aar
Die Vöglein erzittern, vernehmen sie nur sein rauschendes Flügelpaar

>>281727283
>>281727732
Nice. Can’t wait until I unpack mine. I have the Madoka too.

>>281727732
I can't understand anything.

According to new changes in intergalactic labor law, all prospective magical girls must be presented a full written contract, displayed to and affirmed by them using a Nintendo DS.

>>281728799
QB stuck in 2005...

bump

She is fucking adorable

Kyouko the pro...

>>281733733
DDR player

>>281734531
madoka when she eats too much despair

I want them to be happy

Strangle Madoka
Whip Oriko
Shock Homura

>>281735409
Kyubey...

>>281735441
Oriko is canonically a strangler

Hug Kyouko

>>281735409
Walpurgisnacht...

>>281719085
Why do you refuse to accept that's what people do to you when you're trying to "bait"?

>>281723514
Correct. Saying "seed" to refer to the initial start up of something is a common use the phase.

>>281735918
Sleep schedule

My body is a machine that turns kyoukos into pregnant kyoukos

Why is she like this

>>281736433
It's funny how you refuse to answer what's said to you, because you know it ruins your narrative.

>>281736475
she missed the first time so she's just making sure

>>281736475
She saw retards shipping her with other girls on the internet and got depressed

a winrar is me

>>281736433
It's almost 6am. This is the normal time people get up.

>>281736571
You usually wake up later though and you were posting on the archives 4 hours before that post was made meaning you only slept for 4 hours.

>>281736604
Please stop screaming about the voices in your head.
This level of deranged obsession over the personal lives of other posters is not normal.

>>281736640
But am I wrong though?

>>281736658
Yes.

Hey Aromi-chan

Do you two ever get tired of arguing

>>281736686
See >>281735918 + >>281719085

>>281736725
Is the sum 0?

>>281736732
>sum 0
No, that's your IQ.

>>281736742
Aren't you the guy who said 1/1=0

>>281736755
No one ever said that. You are, like always, screeching about the voices in your head.

>>281736775
The proof is there in that pastebin

>>281736794
You mean the pastebin that shows someone saying "the difference between 1 and 1 is 0". i.e. Subtraction.
And the pastebin where you claim a bunch of random different people are the same person.

>>281736803
So it really was you

Oriko Tatsuya love

I guess not

>>281736838
You've been spamming about this shit for years. Do you really think people aren't aware of what your usual arguments are? Do you really think only one person can see your posts?

>>281736892
Oh the irony

>>281736925
Why do you think saying this makes you look smart?

>>281736934
Just pointing out obvious facts

>>281736892
You clearly say that the ratio between 1 and 1 is 0 here:
https://desuarchive.org/a/thread/125583405/#125583767_43
https://desuarchive.org/a/thread/125583405/#125583767_47
https://desuarchive.org/a/thread/125583405/#125583767_54
https://desuarchive.org/a/thread/125583405/#125583767_56

Let's present this as a syllogism.

i. "And guess what everyone having a +1 value is? It's a fucking 1 to 1 ratio."
ii. "I stated it made the +1 worthless. What does the word worthless mean? 0. "
iii. "Now seeing as how everyone has that +1 it's rather meaningless. "
::: Every having an equally valid opinion means the opinions are worthless because it is a 1:1 ratio, the value of which is 0.

Ergo, you said 1/1=0.

Uh oh

>>281736948
>>281736991
Saying "facts" doesn't mean what you're saying is fact. Same applies to saying the word irony.

>>281736982
>you said 1/1=0.
You don't understand anything. And it's insane how stupid you are. It's literally talking about taking a value of 1 away of from 1.

>you
What would make you accept that everyone who wants you to stop shitposting is not the same person.

>>281737062
You were talking about exchanges between two parties of things with equal value. That's not
>1-1=0
it is
>1-1+1=0
The delta difference is 0, the values remains the same. And no, you said 1:1=0. The quotes don't lie. Your being desperate to deflect and ignore the facts presented because it doesn't suit your narrative is pathetic.

Lol

Sean please.

Melori is mad

>>281737231
You know, I'm not the biggest Madoka fan, but I've always felt Homu had a brilliant design.

>>281737186
>>281737210
Stop thinking you're smart. Stop being obsessed with other posters. Stop being consumed with a single post made over a decade ago.

>everyone having a +1
>the +1 worthless
1 - 1 = 0.

>>281737247
>>281737254
Your deranged screeching obsession with other posters is actual mental illness.

>>281737279
What did you mean when you said "And guess what everyone having a +1 value is? It's a fucking 1 to 1 ratio."?

>>281737287
>other posters
It’s fine then, we’re only talking about one other poster.

>>281737279
But your obsession with a random tripfag is completely fine, right.

>>281737295
>you
Seek. Help. Stop thinking everyone you've ever argued with is the same person. Stop being obsessed with a single post from over a decade ago.

>>281737301
>we
You are a single person.

>>281737307
No one is obsessed with you. No one wants anything to do with you. The only time anyone mentions you is when you're already shitting up threads.

>>281737314
This thread was fine until Anyone (you) arrived though

>>281737310
Love how you contradict your own post

>>281737326
>>281737327
No, the thread was not fine. You saying it's fine doesn't mean it is. The thread has dozens of your shitposts in it.
You try to pretend "thread is my safe space" = "thread is fine".

>>281737295
It's obviously talking about factoring and simplification.
When an equation has equal values on both sides they cancel out.

>>281737339
Everyone but you thought the thread was fine

>>281737355
You are not everyone.
Consensus != fact. (not that you even have the consensus)
So even if you you did, the thread is still objective bad. But you're a deranged schizo who thinks reality isn't real.

>>281737364
I see you're still triggered about that post in the archive making fun of you. And how you are, again, trying to use what people said to you to try and "trigger" them.

>>281737367
It’s a fact that nobody was complaining before you came here
It’s also a fact that thread quality is subjective and that if nobody has a problem with a thread then it can be considered to be a good thread.

>>281737376
It worked though. People got triggered.

>>281737385
>thread quality is subjective
Wrong, schizo. The word quality can't even be subjective, you clown. It means to measure something.

>>281737399
Replying will never mean "triggered". Stop being insane. You are not owned people not replying to you just because you post something with the intention of baiting.

>>281737310
I'm not obsessed with the post, I only bring it up to show how you have zero credibility whatsoever and how pathetic you are for not being able to admit the slightest wrong even when it does not concern your core contentions. Your screaming about how those posts aren't yours is just your seething about the fact you were cornered with incontrovertibly evidence you did in fact say 1:1=0 as you were speaking about relative values between tokens and you can't lie anymore. If those posts weren't yours, you wouldn't have initially defended them in the first place. You are just desperate to shift the goalposts.

>>281737406
>The word quality can't even be subjective, you clown. It means to measure something
This is blatantly wrong. There is no unit for thread quality, no way to objectively measure and quantify it, therefore it can’t be objective.
>You are not owned
True, you’re the one who got owned

>>281737437
>I'm not obsessed with the post
You've brought it up literally (LITERALLY) thousands of times over the past 10+ years. That's obsession.

>credibility
Right and wrong is not based on credibility. How many times do you need to be told this?

>ur mad!! ur mad!! ur mad!!!
Stop. Seek help.

>If those posts weren't yours, you wouldn't have initially defended them in the first place.
Yeah? But "everyone" jumps to defend your shitposts?

hoes mad hoes mad

>>281737354
I thought it was about subtraction as you said in >>281737279? Why are you changing your story now? And no, you said "What does the word worthless mean? 0." X/X is always 1. That's why the same values on the side of a divided and a divisor get cancelled out: because it is the same value. Or if you will:

X*Y/Z*Y=X/Z
(X/Z)*(Y/Y)=X/Z
Y/Y=1
(X/Z)*1=X/Z

You are solving equations with the assumption 1/1=1 but are saying 1/1=0. Lol.

>>281737471
>>281737481
Space your posts correctly. You will never "not reddit space" to fit in here.

Reality will never be subjective.
>the meth addict with rotting teeth is happy so that means it's objectively good!!
Literal clown logic.

>>281737482
>you
Seek fucking help. Stop thinking everyone you reply to is the same person.

>but are saying 1/1=0
No one but you ever said this.

>>281737278
She's very cute. I want to hug her and tell her everything will be okay.

>>281737491
I did a better job defending your position than you ever did btw
https://desuarchive.org/a/thread/281692205/#q281722098_2

>>281737491
The meth addict is happy in the short term but will soon become unhappy or die early. This thread would have stayed normal if you didn’t enter it.

>>281737515
You are a genuine schizo.

>>281737496
>Seek fucking help. Stop thinking everyone you reply to is the same person
>No one but you ever said this
lol

>>281737532
It's funny how you don't realize that you are the meth addiction in this analogy.
Meth addict being happy = thread being "fine" (bad)
The thread is not "normal" with your off topic shitposting bait attempts in them.
The thread dying (you driving away normal posters with your garbage quality posts) is the meth addict dying in the long term.

>>281737540
Well someone's seething they got owned.

>>281737557
>e- everyone is obsessed with a singular archive post made over 10 years ago!! i- it's not just me i promise!!

>>281737564
Will you ever answer the question as to how many times a day you scream "ur mad" at people?

>>281737563
Let me use terms you will understand. The bait is a seed post. You water the seeds and they grow into weeds that entangle the whole thread. The seed by itself is not especially disruptive, but your constant replying which invites more replies and bait for you clutters the thread. By not replying to bait, you are not derailing threads.

>>281737588
>The seed by itself is not especially disruptive
Wrong. You are literally trying to pretend that you should be allowed to break the rules and make bad posts. And the only way something is wrong is if you get told to stop shitposting.

Here's an actual correct analogy.
The thread is a public park.
Your posts are nigger-tier spray painting on the wall.
Even if no one says anything about the vandalism, the park quality is still lowered by it being there.

>constant replying
People only reply when you make more posts. If you don't keep trying to "bait" there will only be a single post telling you off. Why is it not wrong that you keep trying to bait, and it's only wrong when people tell you to fuck off?

>>281737610
The wrongs don't make a right though. Even if bait posts are genuinely awful and disruptive to the thread, your replies to nothing to deter them, invite them even more, and further derail the threads. If bringing about a minor justice facilitates a worse and greater injustice, it is imprudent and unjust to pursue the former. For instance, many Irish terrorists were given pardons under the Good Friday Agreement of 1999. While it is certainly unjust that they didn't receive punishment for their crimes, the agreement did end the ethnic wars in Northern Ireland. If the agreement hadn't been reached, many more would be dead in terrorist attacks today. It was therefore just in the greater scheme to permit the minor injustice to occur to facilitate concord between two warring peoples and obviate further suffering.

Your ethics are rigidly deontological and bereft of any and all phronesis and wholly unconcerned with equity within actual circumstances apart from abstract theorizing.

>>281737732
>if i act badly and refuse to stop you HAVE to give me a safe space or shitpost or else you are the problem
No.

Uh oh melty

>>281737809
How many times, daily, do you screech "ur mad" at people?

>>281737563
>The thread dying (you driving away normal posters with your garbage quality posts)
But this never happened

>>281737771
You literally can't stop anyone from shitposting and are just incentivizing further shitposts by replying with your schizoid meltdowns. It's truly remarkable how you are still too retarded to get that what your baiters want is your response and not the right to a "safe space". You can just report shitposts and that will be fulfilling your civic duty to the site to prevent bad posts. That's why citizens are better off calling the police instead of taking matters into their own circumstances in real life as they can get hurt; a pregnant woman shouldn't be entering into violent confrontations with burglars when she can get herself and her child killed. She is not giving him the burglar a safe space in doing so: she is acting prudentially and bringing about a just state of affairs in accordance with *epieikeia*. You can't do anything to stop shitposts yourself, so be content with reporting alone.

>>281737842
Threads are vastly worse than they used to be. And it all started happening when you spammed threads with your attempts to "bait".

>>281737843
>give me safe space OR ELSE! you are the problem
No one thinks like this.

>baiters
>s
You are a single person. And you bait no one. Fail troll is fail, as they say.

>>281737843
Genuine question. What would it take to make you accept that you have never once made anyone mad.

>>281737870
>Threads are vastly worse than they used to be
In the tripfag circlejerk times? No.

>>281737926
Threads used to have active translations and scanlations in them. Threads used to have actual discussion. They used to be good. And you killed it. Just like you killed Gridman threads, Yuyuyu threads, LycoReco threads, etc etc. You spam them to death with your attempts to "bait" (validate yourself), and you drive away everyone interested in actual discussion of the series.

>>281737870
>>give me safe space OR ELSE! you are the problem
You're very desperate to avoid the argumentation I've made as to the futility of your actions and how they exacerbate shitposting. It's also interesting how you have a few excuses as to why you shitpost in threads with derailing garbage that you alternate between; it's either "It is deontologically evil to permit I_love a safe space" or it's "I want to kill I_love by forcing him to reply so much he exhausts himself to death". Of course, the latter begs the question: why aren't you attacking him on other sites? Your excuse that you don't care what I_love does on other sites makes no sense -- if pestering him on other sites further contributes to exhausting him and thus prevents further shitposts on 4chan, shouldn't you do it? Or maybe deep down you know that your baiters aren't a singular Polish tranny from 2015 and you want your safe space here where you can pretend that's the case.

>>281727926
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3wBsZfHRy4&list=RDMMX3wBsZfHRy4&start_radio=1

>>281738098
You are the only person who refuses to type your tripcode correctly.
You are the only shitposter here.
You are the only one who tries (and fails) to bait.

Oh thank god another person is here

>>281738127
Why are you sidestepping the questions like the special exception to every double standard?

>>281737979
I’m pretty sure anime going mainstream is what killed those threads by bringing in extroverts projecting western lgbt shit on the characters. As well as increased censorship from the mod team. None of these two things are related to you or your boogeyman. The world doesn’t revolve around you

>>281738127
The way you call your boogeyman is literally a filtered word on this site because of how much you spam. It’s impossible to type it "correctly".

>>281738160
>>281738166
>>281738205
>like the special exception to every double standard?
This isn't even sort of how you correctly use this statement is a sentence. Grammatically.
And nothing was side stepped. You just keep repeating "give me a safe space OR ELSE!"

>As well as increased censorship from the mod team.
You mean censorship of people telling you to stop shitposting?

>>281738244
>You mean censorship of people telling you to stop shitposting?
No? I mean censorship of anon calling out the lgbt tourists. Why do you think everything is about you or akemi? The state of this board wouldn’t be much different if neither of you existed.

>>281738296
>anon
You mean you? You're the only person who does this "anti yuri" shit. And you've been IP banned proving it many times over.

And threads were their most active when yuri doujin and manga were scanlated in these threads.

>>281738244
Oh plenty of things were sidestepped like: a) attempts to bring about minor retributive justice can bring about further chaos and facilitate even greater injustice, thus making them imprudent and more unjust than leaving the minor injustice be, b) you can't do anything against shitposting in threads so you should just report and then ignore, c) it makes no sense for you to not have pestered I_love on other sites to further push him to death per your own logic, d) your saying that you just don't want to give I_love a safespace is being utterly dishonest because your intent is actually to kill I_love, so when you keep bringing up the former, you are acting in bad faith and e) you are pathologically obsessed with never admitting you are wrong on matters where you are objectively incorrect.

>>281738341
>give me a safe space OR ELSE!
No.

>>281738353
I am not saying "or else" though; you will keep getting baited so long as you continue responding to everything irrespective of my choices. Even if I wanted to make your baiters stop owning, I can't. You do realize that you are just too autistic to consider a different worldview and rethink your priors despite getting owned too hard? You aren't addressing anything being said about how your presuppositional framework is wholly incoherent and just repeating old nonsense like doubling down on it makes it true. You're behaving like a 5 year old on the playground basically.

>>281738334
Do you think I’m the only person on 4chan who opposes faggot shit and tourists?

>>281738432
Also threads were most active when the show was airing. It’s old now so obviously they’re less active.
And I’m not sure why you’re lying about people posting scans of yuri doujins here on a blue board and expecting anyone to believe you.

>>281737979
You're the one who decided to give up scanlation to own the heckin bad bogeyman though. Neither I_love nor anyone else forced you to make the choices that you did; you could've been content with reporting shitposts and continued doing your thing. You didn't. That's your fault. Not I_love's.

Early meltdown?

>>281738419
You will never bait anyone.
Stop deluding yourself into thinking any label you try to ascribe to something changes reality.

>>281738503
Stop deluding yourself into thinking anyone in the world who tells you to stop shitposting is the same person.
You drove away everyone who used to contribute to these threads. People don't want to wallow in your shit.

>>281738432
>>281738541
Yes, you are the only person who makes "anti yuri" posts. Just like you are the only person who screeches "ur mad" 100s of times a day.

I'm thinking lowercase fucking sucks

>>281738585
Imagine getting mind broken this hard by a totally random post in scanlation threads that you randomly started pretending is your boogieman.

Also, again, see >>281735918 + >>281719085

Imagine feeling addressed by random posts

>>281738617
Imagine being obsessed with the feelings of random anonymous people over the internet.
And as always, people can recognize the intentions of your shitposts without being the person you are trying to target with your shitposts.

1 3 11

>>281738670
You're not smart. No one thinks your posts are normal. You're not subtle.

Obsessed schizo

>>281738562
The post wasn't about my baiting anyone though. You're just regurgitating your worn out locutions repeatedly. The post was about your being too stupid and autistic to even grasp what I'm saying; you haven't refuted it anything said, you're just reasserted your arguments premissed on postulates I worked to refute. You're completely lacking in self-awareness.

ACK, we've been over this too many times. Your writing style and behavioural patterns are extremely recognizable. It's highly improbable that COUNTLESS PEOPLE would never be caught having conversations between each other sharing information about and figuring out a shitposter, discussing whether he is one or multiple people. It's highly improbable that every single person on 4chan knows who I_love is and that there aren't any newfags stumbling in these threads who are consequently confused by what's happening in these threads, only for them to be called I_love by you for not realizing the name of your bogeyman is supposed to be a trip. Your nonsense is self-evidently wrong.

>>281738579
Do you think all of /pol/ is one person?

>>281738166
In 2011 anime was already mainstream zoomer, Rebellion was the beggining of the end for Madoka.

>>281739804

>>281738819
>The post wasn't about my baiting
You called yourself "baiters". Trying to passive aggressively imply you are more than one person.

>writing style and behavioural patterns are extremely recognizable.
Nope. You just go spastic over normal English.
You on the other hand, people have spelled out your behavior patterns to a T. And no, you changing how many capital letters or periods you use does not change your "posting style.

>only for them to be called I_love
The only "people" who get called you are "people" who make rule breaking posts. Not everyone makes rule breaking posts.
Explain why someone wouldn't join these threads, see you spastically trying to "bait", and then think you're the problem.

>>281739174
All of /pol/ does not spam about yuri. Pretty much the only time it gets mentioned there is when you do it.

>>281739970
Correct.

>>281737986
Very Gay. Not normal friendship.
Seed post.

>>281739906
>Trying to passive aggressively imply you are more than one person.
There's nothing passive aggressive about saying the truth.

>You just go spastic over normal English.
Constant mass quoting, same repeating phrases and arguments, same tendency to quote a post just for the sake of quoting it without addressing it, same autistic inability to grasp argumentation, same obsession with crack and polygamy, same denial of what "don't feed the troll" means and screaming "replying will never mean baited", same way of writing ACK as "ack", same dyspeptic fury and bloviating against everyone who disagrees with you, etc.

>The only "people" who get called you are "people" who make rule breaking posts.
Nice broken English.

>Explain why someone wouldn't join these threads, see you spastically trying to "bait", and then think you're the problem.
Because then they see you reply and needlessly drag everything out. Of course, people can and do resent people who bait you for derailing their threads, but no-one thinks you are a hero for biting the bait and replying like a psychopath.

>>281739573
Not nearly as much and lgbt shit was contained to tumblr, also Rebellion changed nothing. The only people who watched Rebellion were those who were already into the series. I’m not sure why you think rebellion made the series more popular.

>>281739906
/pol/ hates faggotry in general, if you have a thread about anime there you can be sure you will see people shit on yuri.

>>281740714
Why crop Homu out? That’s rude

>>281740746
Maybe she's on another page.

>>281740103
That’s just a traced version of an official scene. It’s not gay.

>>281740565
>>281740103
>replying like a psychopath
>needlessly drag everything out
Why aren't you the one replying like a psychopath and needlessly dragging everything out? Why are you, like always, the special exception and nothing you say applies to yourself.

You just keep trying to pretend that it should a given law of reality that you get your way and no one else does, and you allowed to shitpost as much as you want, and no one can say anything to you.

Everything else is answered here.
https://files.catbox.moe/f38ghw.txt

>>281742157
What do you think of this song? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-ifukvnICY

>>281742213
Same thing I think about every post you make.
You're mentally ill.

>>281740746
There is only enough love between kyoko and sayaka. Homura has madoka.

>>281742271
So you’re cropping official art so it fits your yuri skitzocow narratives? Doesn’t look like something a real fan would do.
Then again a real Madoka fan wouldn’t gayship the characters in the first place.

>>281742259
How is asking for your opinion on a song mentally ill?

>>281740581
>/pol/ hates faggotry in general, if you have a thread about anime there you can be sure you will see people shit on yuri.
Really /pol/ is so bad nowadays? Back then you could see some people shitting on anime just because it was for otaku(due to all those stereotypes and and degenerate), it was not needed to be about yuri.
and other people defending it and saying this is an anime website. Either way pol always had different opinions about certain things. Is what i liked about it,

>>281742782
There’s always been pro anime and anti anime posters on /pol/
Pro anime ones single out yuri/yaoi/futa and all that shit while anti anime ones claim anime itself is bad

>>281742852
Before 2016 elections i remember the "red pill" was still a trend and anime just like videogames was seen as something not that good(ironically degenerate). But that should not be taken seriously, of course, it was addiction to entertainment that is bad.
>Pro anime ones single out yuri/yaoi/futa
As a poltard without enough knowledge about "anime lingo" back then i could never notice that difference, for me every /a/ poster was equal. So i was wrong. Still having anime-like girls like christ-chan on our side was cool.

>>281742157
>You are first hand proof that giving a troll a safe space means they will just spam and post harder.
You're so mentally ill it's unreal lmao. You've been the exact fucking opposite retard. It's been 10 fucking years. Has your constant spamming done anything to deter "I_love" in the slightest?

>No one is obsessed with those
You only spam like a madman in Mushoku Tensei threads instead of ignoring it. Totally not obsessed. You only wrote multiple fucking essays on wordpress and as post-scripts of your scanlations and sperged out when sites like DS removed them. Totally not obsessed lol.

>How does this not apply to you where you reply just for the sake of replying and posting a crack image.
Because you have an obsessive autistic fixation on and compulsion to point out every single one of "I_love's" posts for no coherent reason whilst without even bothering to address whatever point they may have, often incisive and disastrous to your worldview. People who bait you don't quote every single post of yours.

>Why isn't writing "ACK" proof of who you are?
Because that's how it was originally written as an acronym. Moreover, there is this thing called cumulative evidence; by itself, your writing your nickname as "ack" isn't particularly potent evidence. But when it aligns perfectly with other behavioural patterns, it is.

>"Mass quoting" isn't a thing.
You were already refuted thrice on this in the archives. This is why no-one talks to you ACK; you get incontrovertibly and irreparably refuted, you sperg out and deflect to avoid admitting your were owned, then days, weeks, months or years later you pretend it never happened, get confuted once more, try to shift the goalposts about what you had originally said, etc. It's like arguing with a pigeon: you take a shit and are legitimately too low IQ to even grasp what is being argued. I only do it occasionally because it is fun watching you squirm.

Why did they make the character so hot? I can't go on these threads without getting horny FUCK

>2016 pol
>pol anons were not that divided and it was like a lot of anons together against common enemies.
It was so good, the last time i felt that spirit in a group. Brotherhood.

>>281743497
Ume enjoys teenage girls.

>>281743575
Her target audience sure does.

I would like to know what the /a/ poster of 2015-2016 thought about /pol/ before 2016. I just kept there because i felt certain hostility toward us on /a/, but i never confirmed if /a/ was really against /pol/ in those times.
Now there was a guy who has told me /a/ was always right wing, makes it feel so surreal and hard to believe.

>>281742019
>>281742157
That guy made the most obvious bait in this thread and you till ate it. Shame on you.

>>281744209
*still

>>281744209
Ironic misinformation is still misinformation

>>281743924
Yes, /pol/ was, and still is, a laughing stick. Things got worse since then.

>>281744268
Dude, look at the mirror, have self-awareness, if you are as easy to bait as 3 letters(3 letter replied the very same post) then you have a problem. You(or anyone who replied) should have not replied to that.
Self-awareness, self-awareness, learn once for all to have that.

>>281743924
4chan has never been uniformly right wing or left wing, it is a site that attracts above all else contrarians and those who aren't free to speak their opinions elsewhere. That means that a lot of 4chan is millennials who are basically Reddit atheist faggots who still think it is the Bush Presidency but never figured out Iraq was fought at the behest of Israel. But the /pol/ election tourist narrative is idiotic, as there was always a presence of people who were extreme rightists. Just keep in mind that the former are people who are often afflicted with troll's remorse and are obsessed with covering up how politically incorrect even left leaning people were on this site. They used to say nigger, faggot, etc. too. The culture of 4chan existed in the Bush and Obama eras can't really exist in the post-Trump world, where politics have been thoroughly polarized.

I am a waste of life still

>>281743924
Just do your own research in the archives.

>>281744300
>>281744393
>4chan has never been uniformly right wing or left wing
Thanks for the replies i will keep this for the record.
>The culture of 4chan existed in the Bush and Obama eras
Man, not knowing english back then made me avoid english sites like 4chan. But the amount of pro obama news and the support of a good share of millenials for Obama as opposed to MCcain seen as something old fashioned, makes me curious about what 4chan thought about those elections back then. I will never know, but if somehow many of them were against Obama then they were based.

>>281744358
So if I make an argument and say the post is bait everyone is forbidden from replying to my argument?
This is a bait post btw, if you reply you got baited.

but I cant stop trying for Homura

>>281744926
You are weird sometimes, like you say something like "i'm defeated" and then "i never give up". I think you are hiding something from us. homurAnon what is your endgame?

>>281745240
living life as best as I can
so far its not going that well as you know

>>281744857
I mean the difference between Obama and McCain wasn't that great, they were both subversive centrist degenerates preaching corporatism and social liberalism under the ZOG status quo. If anything, Obongo the nigger might have been marginally preferable to McGoy because at least the former did pursue policies mildly critical of Israel and opposed to its insane foreign policy. He signed the Iran Deal, refrained from overthrowing Assad, broke the back of AIPAC in Congress, appointed Chuck Hagel as Defense Secretary despite widespread opposition from the Israel Lobby and its servile Goypublican slaves, etc. McCain's presidency would have been total ZOG domination. Of course, in 2008, a major distinction between Obama and McCain on Israel wouldn't've been apparent during the election itself. Obama also bent the knee at AIPAC that year. McCain was unironically created in a laboratory as the most milquetoast yet deranged establishment politician just so he could lose to Obongo the nigger.

>>281745371
You are really suspicious for me sometimes. I don't forget "that" post.

>>281745588
Trump in 2016 was total ZOG domination too and that didn't stop pol from supporting trump.

>>281745601
hm?

>>281745819
Eh. ZioBlorpf had some redeeming qualities in terms of his foreign policy because he was THE first politician to openly attack the Iraq War as a disaster and humiliated Jeb! in the primaries over it. Trump singlehandedly resuscitated paleoconservative non-interventionism and facilitated the gradual normalization of skepticism of NATO, further interventions in the Middle East, etc. Yes, Obongo did attempt half-assed attempt at a pivot to Asia, but then he put the US into further quagmires in the Middle East and in Ukraine, botching his attempts at extricating the US from non-Asian countries; he also failed to ideologically and rhetorically legitimate said policy efforts. ZioBlorpf is indeed a fucking faggot for making an exception out of Israel in his otherwise non-interventionist framework, but in contradistinction to McCain, he actually revitalized racialism in American discourse and allowed for a pivot away from Bush's "compassionate conservatism", with its reification of the free market as an end unto itself, and unabashed opposition to immigration. Half of all hard rightists online and more would not exist without Trump and whatever his deficiencies he has pushed public discourse to the right. McCain was barely a social conservative and was irreparably intransigent towards white racial politics. He and Trump are not comparable at all.

>>281746293
We are going too off-topic and trying to follow this will get us b&, but to leave you my opinion very clear: Under no circumstances, even if the nigger promises the right-wing heaven on earth, i would consider voting for a nigger based. My last reply to this.
>captcha: 4xkkk2
Kek

>>281744209
Replying will never mean baited.

i suck

Homura dont hate me...

>>281746833
Homu said that

>>281746991
Cute.

neglected my responsibility and wasted the day
nothing got done
i suck
atleast i managed to get clean somehow i am amazed i managed to keep that up maybe its just the pain keeping me in line
i suck
i wouldnt deserve homura

>>281747090
But why would she hate you? I can't see the reason.

>>281740103
>Seed post.
I refuse to listen to either of you so i don't know what that means

>>281748998
why is she so flat. that's homura's role.

>>281749069
Homura grew up

What denomination of Christianity is she/her family anyway?

>>281749649
Cute

>>281748899
You made the seed post fulfill its task with your reply. Of course you don't what it means because is not common english.

>>281750187
Is it like a grief seed? If i keep mentioning it will someone turn into a witch or something

>>281755426
>If i keep mentioning it will someone turn into a witch or something
You are close.

Magical girls turn into witches, normal girls turn into bitches.

Homura is a good catholic women

Apparently we are getting more news about Kaiten on the 13th

>>281758804
Neat.

Her Greed in unholy

>>281703374 (OP)
I love you meguca.

>>281761386
Cute and canon couple.

>>281761386
Cute couple

Replying twice means baited twice

Uh oh addressed

>Schizo doubles down on his delusion
Kek

Homura loves Sayaka

Yuritroons love getting cucked

>lolcow triples down on his delusion
LOL

>n-no u
I accept the concession of the schizo.

Blackpill: talking about yourself in third person and schizo posting on 4chan will not make our yuri ships canon bros…

>>281765467
This is very rude towards Homu

>>281765595
Sorry Homu.

Good morning sir.

Grief seed post.

>>281766355
*nom*

>>281766355
I never paid attention to their designs, this is pretty cool.

>>281766355
I can recognize Oktavia and Walpurgisnacht but not the rest.

>>281764703
Dude these last days there was someone who was mad about this, i hope you don't sacrifice your kind for shitposting. Who the fuck was that guy? I can't tell.

>>281766524
I just found it on the internet, i'm too lazy to find of who witch are those grief seeds.
>seed post actually worked
based

I can't stop thinking about "seed post", it contaminated my mind. it's 3letters fault.

seed p_t.

what am i still doing wrong

>>281768495
What happened now?

>>281768570
nothing good and thats the problem

>>281769046
Come on, something must have been good well.

>>281769377
it would be nice

its all a Mess

>>281769291
The pachinko had some kino stuff

>>281770066
>You have to gamble money to get a chance of seeing the girls be happy and silly.
Devious.

I had forgotten about ID boogeyman, the killer of false narrative schizos.

>>281769529
If i was you i would be happy of not being that brown. You don't know how good you have it.

>>281703374 (OP)
madolove

bump

>>281772131
So cuuute, muy hermosa.

Seed post.

>>281774405
Mami so pretty..

>>281703374 (OP)
we all do anon

bump

>>281780843
>rapes her
your move

>>281781246
Don't rape the Homu

>>281781304
She is provoking tho.

>>281781435
True

Sayaka and Kyouko will fuck in Kaiten and it won't be a fade to black

>>281782943
Based, but who will they fuck? Kyosuke?

>>281782988
Each other. Stop pretending canon isn't canon

>>281782988
It will be revealed that Sayaka has a brother and due to having the biggest room he has to share his room with Kyouko until she finds somewhere else to go to. At some point Sayaka goes by his room and hears moans, ends up accidentally peeping on her brother fucking Kyouko, Kyouko notices her and forces her in then they fuck her brother together

Threesome with Madoka and Homura

>>281783036
>>281783034
They're lesbians

>>281783014
They canonically have no will to fuck each other though. You are making your own scenario unlikely to ever happen.
Also, fucking is between men and women not women and women.

>>281783040
Explain this https://wiki.puella-magi.net/Puella_Magi_Madoka_Magica_the_Movie:_Rebellion_Official_Guidebook_%22Only_You%22

Christ is King

>>281783051
>>281783060
Didn't read, Madoka is yuri

>>281711232
>Official art of Kyouko and Homura both marrying the viewer
It seems ffmCHADS are the target audience of this franchise.

>>281783112
>Didn't read
Yeah that much was obvious

>Homura is literally me!!!
Cool, lose weight and marry a man then.

>>281783040
If we are going to be retarded about the "sexualities" of fictional people then Madoka is implied to be bi through her desire to have a cool husband (as seen with the 100 questions) and her love for Homura. Homura would do anything Madoka wants of her, thus convincing Madoka would be all you need to do to organize a threesome between you and the other two
Ultimately what i said above is retarded and same goes for other argument surrounding the sexualities of these fictional anime women, which these threads for some reason love to talk about. Unless the text of the series itself states otherwise Madoka and Homura could be straight or gay or whatever the fuck else you want them to be. The more staff interviews i read the more i am of the opinion that Urobuchi himself doesn't give much of a shit about the sexuality of either Madoka or Homura, thus making any arguments about such even more retarded. Outside of the fact that the love between Homura and Madoka is non-sexual in nature nothing else can be said which doesn't contradict the statements of other staff members and isn't based on headcanon.
Having said that i still want to fuck both the gay catholic Homura and her girlfriend Madoka at the same time. This opinion will not be changed

>>281783067
Kyouko...

>>281783236
>her love for Homura
where

Sexualities aren’t real, everyone is attracted to the opposite sex, same sex attraction is paraphilia. There is no indication that it’s any different in the madokaverse, and Urobuchi already said that Homura’s love isn’t homosexual and isn’t romantic, and that Sayaka never got a new love interest after Kyosuke, so they don’t have that paraphilia either.
This is objectively true and ignoring the facts will not make them disappear.

homura...

Minors can not make contracts without parental approval. Kyubey should have to ask each girl's parents if he can make a contract with them.

when will i finally feel ok

>>281784016
One day Anon, one day

>>281784424
Subtle tits and ass are so hot

>>281784657
Agreed

>>281784095
i hope everything will be ok in the end

>>281784889
It will be Anon
Have hope

>>281783133
>marrying the viewer
The viewer can be a woman too anon...

>>281786073
But women only exist in anime

>>281786073
Male-targeted franchise

I don't understand what is the point of pushing false narratives.

>>281783236
>surrounding the sexualities of these fictional anime women, which these threads for some reason love to talk about.
From september 2023 till march 2024 these discussion were not common, it existed but it was not as common. It's just a small group of people who has that big insecurity and want to always say characters are straight, and if you are straight you would know normal hetero men don't have that kind of insecurity. A small group relentssly discussing this (me included) is something relatively new.

feeling wonky is very annoying
love my sweet homura

>>281783295
I don't know why people like you always underestimate the viewer.
>Urobuchi already said that Homura’s love isn’t homosexual and isn’t romantic, and that Sayaka never got a new love interest after Kyosuke,
It doesn't matter much what the author says if the narrative shows something different according to the viewer, and is the viewer who affect the online communities.
Let's imagine the opposite case: an author saying their women are lesbian. If the narrative never shows any lesbian subtext and even give them close male friends, that would be enough for some part of the fandom to say that they are not actually lesbian despite of what the author says.
I was looking for who to blame, but the fact that every Madoka Magica group i have found has a big percentage of gay jokes makes me accept that Madoka Magica is to blame too. This doesn't happens to all magical girls shows, and some of them have even more weird subtext.

>>281786422
Many times happen that the intended target audience doesn't coincide with the actual audience, that's why they decide to cater to the unintended audience if they want to keep things afloat.

>>281788042
>the shit I make up matters more than reality
No

>>281788164
But the actual audience is male too.

>>281788368
>But the actual audience is male too.
No, Urobuchi said he heard many female fans liked Madoka. In the same interview where he says he didn't write with "female characters" in mind.

>>281788659
"Many" = maybe like 15% when he was expecting 5%
You’d have to be retarded to look at the pmmm community and claim it’s female dominated
Like half of the og Madoka memes are about being horny for the girls

>>281788368
>No
It's not about reality, i was talking about possible interpretations fans can have and how they can be valid to some degree.
But you seem to miss my point, Who is to blame for this? This doesn't affect other magical girls shows so i guess Madoka Magica inflicted some damage to itself.
I mean if Urobuchi said about the "girls friendship" of Nanoha and Hidamari were his inspirations then it's obvious things would not end well with those inspirations.
Again you seem afraid of telling us the main culpable with the current evidence.

>>281788750
>Many" = maybe like 15% when he was expecting 5%
Then i was correct according to you, 15% is a considerable audience, i never meant female fans were the majority or that it was dominated by them. And you are obtuse if you think didn't try to cater to them if you think it was like 15%.

>>281788817
>Who is to blame for this?
The mentally ill schizos themselves, and I guess whoever raped them as a child.
>This doesn't affect other magical girls shows
Delusional.

>>281788936
*you think they didn't try to cater

>>281788936
The only way female fans are pandered to are through things like official jewelry
If they wanted the series itself to pander to a female audience they would add male characters

>>281788940
>The mentally ill schizos themselves, and I guess whoever raped them as a child.
And those mentally ill don't dominate every space of other magical girls show. It doesn't add up with current evidence.
>Delusional.
No,is reality, you can find at least some refuge in other magical girls show without the "mentally ill", Madoka Magica seems like everywhere i go i need to stand gay jokes often. And most of its fans are normal anime viewers, otakus or whatever you call them.

>>281789078
Again, delusional. Every all girls series is affected.

The real proof that Madoka is a straight series is that it was made in 2011. Faggots and trannies didn't exist until 2015 when the jews started using them to subvert the west so Madoka was made before faggots even existed.

>>281789126
No, i don't know why you insist in that lie, using every means that you watched all magical girls show to begin with.
Other magical girls(that i have sees) you can avoid them, in Madoka Magica it seems you can't avoid them.

>>281789218
I recognize your posting style

be good body

>>281789218
>Faggots and trannies didn't exist until 2015
anon, proud of being fag identity was starting going rampant this time without shame in all media at least since 2011.

>>281789273
There is no lie.

i am tired of suffering

>>281789218
The real proof that Madoka is a straight series is that the author said so and there is nothing in it that contradicts it which is why the only people who see it as anything else are people with an agenda, such as lgbt retards on normalfag sites or yuri schizos here.

>>281788975
>The only way female fans are pandered to are through things like official jewelry
>If they wanted the series itself to pander to a female audience they would add male characters
This is reductionism of female nature that makes you look like you are a primitive man saying "women like only male and jewelry" and ignoring how the media can pander to them to some degrees in other ways.
Male and female nature are different and in the case of females the can be attracted by other things like the girly things, the setup, the symmetry, the colorful environment and more. It's weird your extreme reductionism. The things is that girls enjoyed watching madoka magica, pretending they are not considerable part of the fandom is wrong.

>>281789583
>There is no lie.
No,that's a lie according to what i have seen, I have found a escape from yuri and other fetishist schizos in other magical girls show, Madoka is the only exception.
>>281789948
I don't know why the never ending discussion about this. Even normal anime viewers don't see much wrong with gay jokes in madoka magica in all parts i have been. Not all of them are "le evil lgbt schizo with an agenda". This doesn't happen with other magical girls magical girls show to the same degree.

what's up homu

>>281789972
>"women like only male and jewelry"
That’s how corporates think in Japan. Look at anime that actually panders to women.
>pretending they are not considerable part of the fandom is wrong
No it’s not, they aren’t a relevant part of it at all and mostly get into it to get male attention like they do with any other male-focused hobby.

>>281790142
>that's a lie according to what i have seen
Then you’re the one lying.

Tabb thinks he can escape from me here hahahahaha

>>281790698
Who?

>>281790536
>That’s how corporates think in Japan. Look at anime that actually panders to women.
Irrelevant, anime by itself and with all the traits that Madoka Magica has can pander to woman and enjoyed by them.
>No it’s not, they aren’t a relevant part of it at all and mostly get into it to get male attention like they do with any other male-focused hobby.
Nah, Madoka Magica has good history and a lot of things that makes it a good anime. That logic always applies only to popular slop.
>>281790536
>Then you’re the one lying.
No, i'm not. I don't know why you would not believe what i have seen. Sure if i tell you i have seen a black cat you will tell me: "no, you are lying, you have never seen a black cat". Ridiculous.

>>281790698
Who is Tabb? are tab, Tabb and Tabby related to Ed, Edd n Eddy?
I can't understand why you do this.

>>281790978
>anime by itself and with all the traits that Madoka Magica has can pander to woman and enjoyed by them
Because men get into it.
You’re clearly new to anime.
>That logic always applies only to popular slop
It applies to anything popular which Madoka is.
>I don't know why you would not believe what i have seen
Because you will never provide proof even though it would be an extremely easy thing to do.

i still fear for my heart
it doesnt feel great

It’s funny how yuritards claim rebellion pandered to them with the hand holding scene yet at the end we see Sayaka literally crying over Kyosuke still being with Hitomi. Kek. You would think if they wanted to pander to yuritards they would have left that part out.

>>281791214
>Because men get into it.
What panders to women in anime is not related to how many animes have seen. And telling me that the life of a woman revolve around a man is not logic in these times. You are starting to sound deranged, like women of the 40s or before were equal to women of these times.
>It applies to anything popular which Madoka is.
No, when things are popular slops people can get into it due to fomo, or anime of the month or even your reason "to attract male attention".
When things are good, popularity is not the only reason they can attract people regardless of their sex.
>Because you will never provide proof even though it would be an extremely easy thing to do.
If you have watched certain magical girls you would know what i said is true, easily, denying what i say only tells you apart as someone who has seen only recent magical girl shows like Nanoha and their group of fans.

>>281791422
Not taking part in the yuri discussion but Sayaka is crying because she's happy to see Kyousuke again, not because she's still bitter.

>>281791568
>Sayaka is crying because she's happy
Yuritards have been spamming this since the movie came out and it’s the most pathetic cope I ever heard.

>>281791568
Kek, good luck pal, you became a yurifag for certain someone just for saying that.

>>281791564
>telling me that the life of a woman revolve around a man is not logic in these times
Women on the internet absolutely make male gaze their top priority.
>When things are good, popularity is not the only reason they can attract people regardless of their sex
But it’s much less common. Women join a hobby when it’s already popular among men 99% of the time.
>If you have watched certain magical girls you would know what i said is true
Another lie.

>>281791690
I fail to see how that's a yurifag argument. The part of the movie where Hitomi turns into a nightmare specifically focused on Sayaka to show that she's sympathetic instead of bitter toward her. Sayaka understands that a relationship with Kyousuke wouldn't have turned out the way she wanted so she's moved on from that but that doesn't mean that she just stopped caring about Kyousuke which is why she gets so emotional at the end.

>>281791808
>Women on the internet absolutely make male gaze their top priority.
No, maybe the cosplayers. I doubt the female fanfic writer takes into account only the male attention, just giving an example.
>Women join a hobby when it’s already popular among men 99% of the time.
Another statement with no proof, and even in the case of Madoka it was already popular by chapter 5 when it was airing in the anime community. I doubt the female otakus or the like cared about how popular was between males back then. I repeat, anime overall has a lot of things that can attract females by itself.
>Another lie.
No, in certain magical shows you can escape from the lgbt schizos. You are coping by telling me: "No!, you have not seen what you tell me". Sad cope.

>>281791927
>I fail to see how that's a yurifag argument
https://desuarchive.org/a/search/text/%22crying%20because%20she’s%20happy%22/order/asc/

>>281792080
I'm seeing one single yuri post and that one claims Sayaka never liked Kyousuke anyway which is obviously untrue.

>>281792017
>female fanfic writer
So not even 1% of them.
>I doubt the female otakus or the like cared about how popular was between males back then
You’re delusional.
>You are coping by telling me: "No!, you have not seen what you tell me"
And you’re proving me right, by refusing to prove me wrong.

>>281792204
You literally have a post from 2013 complaining about yuritards spamming it.
It’s obvious yuritards just want to shill the narrative that Sayaka has "moved on" from Kyosuke when even the staff said that would have been out of character.

>>281792219
>So not even 1% of them.
That's just one example, there are other groups of females that can like anime without trying to get male attention. It seems like you have never interacted at least once with a female otaku group outside of those "quirky" girls that like male attention online.
>You’re delusional.
Your 99% is very exaggerated, even some surveys says that the demographics is not entirely dominated by males like you say.
Females liking anime for different motives other than getting attention of males is not weird at all.
>And you’re proving me right, by refusing to prove me wrong.
Do you realize that denying what i say only outs you as someone who has watched modern magical girls and only goes to yuri dominated groups? Almost as you are looking for to get mad.

>>281792262
>even the staff said that would have been out of character
Got a link?

>>281792507
See >>281783060

>>281792528
Are you referring to
>For example, it would’ve felt wrong if Sayaka had moved on to a completely new love interest.
Because that doesn't mean she hasn't moved on from Kyousuke, it just means she hasn't got a new love interest.

>>281792488
I'm not saying everything they do is to get male attention i'm saying the prospect of getting it is what gets them into the series in the first place.
>even some surveys says that the demographics is not entirely dominated by males like you say
That's blatantly wrong, anime has always been a male-focused hobby and Madoka is no exception.
>denying what i say only outs
As someone who doesn't accept an argument unless it's backed up? Good.

>>281792704
That means nobody has replaced Kyosuke for her, so obviously she would still be feeling something for him.
It's also very obvious this mentality is why she was shown crying at the end.

>>281792775
Like I said she still cares about Kyousuke but that doesn't mean she's bitter about him being with Hitomi.

>>281792856
I'm not saying she's bitter, just sad

>>281792892
I'm not completely discounting that she has some mixed feelings, but I do think the reason she cries is because she's happy to be alive because she can see Kyousuke again.

>>281793012
Her memories were already wiped by this point so she wouldn't be "happy to be alive" that would make no sense

>>281793031
She seems pretty confused about her reaction herself. She may not remember but that doesn't mean that it isn't the reason.

Madoka is straight
Homura is a lesbian
Mami only loves depressed OLs and cheese loving loli
Sayaka is bi
Kyouka is shit

>>281792723
>That's blatantly wrong, anime has always been a male-focused hobby and Madoka is no exception.
No, since millenials started to get into it. At least from those times(maybe even before)females started to be a significant part of the hobby. Madoka is from 2011, females getting into it already happened. And before 2010 females were more worried getting attention in other ways, i guess it was easier to find genuine otakus back then.
>As someone who doesn't accept an argument unless it's backed up? Good.
You are Mr."I know a lot about anime". You not being able to find a group of other popular anime girls without lgbt schizos, makes you seem more like a liar.

>>281793169
You only got the first one right.

>>281793129
She's obviously lying to cover up her true feelings.
I mean, she's specifically there to not be "happy" by contrast to Nagisa who is very happy.

>>281793249
>females started to be a significant part of the hobby
This is, again, utter delusion. I'm not sure how you came to such a retarded conclusion. Anime has always been seen as a mostly male hobby and stuff aimed at women always fails.
Pretty sure any unbiased person would call the guy who refuses to prove something that would be easy to prove the liar.

>>281793284
I don't think she's lying and also that'd be a pretty weird lie to come up with.
She also seems pretty happy in that later scene where she's hanging out with Kyouko.

>>281793374
>This is, again, utter delusion. I'm not sure how you came to such a retarded conclusion.
I happened to know(only on the surface) a otaku group of females before all lgbt bullshit.
And i even knew a lot of females that watched anime more than i though at the time. You don't need to come to conclusions when you have seen something with your own eyes.
There are surveys online that tell you something about the topic and about the largest population of anime fans(millenials).
I don't deny that most are males, but females are a significant part and real life experience at least confirmed it to me.

>>281793482
She's lying the same way she was lying when Hitomi first told her she wanted to confess to Kyosuke
Sayaka was happy in a completely different scene where she didn't see Kyosuke with Hitomi

>>281793652
>I happened to know(only on the surface) a otaku group of females before all lgbt bullshit
Me too.
They all got into it for male attention.

>>281793675
I just think that's a very uncharitable interpretation of the character, like she hasn't really grown as a person despite everything she's been through.
I suppose Kaiten will put the matter to rest one way or the other.

>>281793719
I would not deny it. It just shows that females can get into it for different reasons, they girls i knew didn't care about male attention back then. You talk like a zoomer or zillenials so i would not be surprised if they did it for attention when social networks were already established ego boosters.

>>281794387
>they girls i knew didn't care about male attention back then
Or you just didn't realize it

>>281795244
I doubt it, knowing that otaku males near were not looking(even below average), i don't think it was the reason for most of them to get into the hobby. And at the time still being seen as a otaku was not something good to get good attention.

Actually I(myself) was a good reason for most of them to not get into anime hobby, they tried to avoid me for being extremely ugly. I still remember... past is sad sometimes.

Sometimes i wonder if me discussing irrelevant things in Madoka threads will be over. People say weird things sometimes and i just want to reply.

>>281795908
I usually don't reply to anything that's off-topic because I'm just not interested.

>>281796005
I reply to something that starts Madoka related but then end up in irrelevant things because people want to double down on his weird statements.
You can see when someone said: "women mostly get into it for male attention" things started to go weird. It's hard to believe for me and i wanted to know if anon seriously thought like that.

come on body
i need you

>cannot waste gems because i need to save for the next favorite meguca
>as times goes on and more megucas enter the pool, it will be harder to ascend your 5* and most likely to get a bad/innecessary 5* Kioku meguca
I'm not even getting fun anymore being a f2p. But for all the extra content i will keep playing Exedra.

I just want to feel ok and then maintain that
i am tired of things slightly improving but then going back
am i doing something wrong
i dont get it
>>281797456
homuras

im sorry im such a trash person homura
i fail at being a basic human being

>>281797697
Homu Homu

>>281797986
my light

>>281797817
For me, you are fine. No need to revive past mistakes.

>>281798164
yes
i havent failed at quitting atleast that is something
didnt think i could make it
but a few months isnt such a long time either
i just hope and pray the future will be ok

>>281798718
>but a few months isnt such a long time either
You are fine, you did what you can, no need to keep record of how many months you have been doing this. Everyone makes mistakes in their life... but me i'm perfect(kek just kidding).

>>281799033
its not like any other aspect of my life is going well sadly

i want to be better for homura

>>281799067
You are fine dude, life is cursed and people is egoistic. Game was rigged from the start. Many people say they were successful with only effort but they can't acknowledge how genetics, luck and money allowed their success.

>>281799263
life is hard
i was unsuccessful for multiple reasons some out of my control
if atleast my body would feel fine that would be something
every day a bit better eould be nice

>>281799353
Genetics can do a lot, e.g. imagine being born with 135+ IQ.
You are a just someone that could not measure well danger on his body. Why would i blame for things outside of your control?

She deserves to be happy

post tamura

KyouSaya

I can't believe it.

>>281803161
Where is this from?

>>281804104
Anthology Comic Vol. 1 Ch. 10 "Date with Mami-San"

HomuSaya

Ui Tamaki is in exedra.

Being f2p is suffering.

Everyone loves Homora

sleep is nice
being with homura
>>281799599
It could have went alot better if i wasnt stupid

>Image limit reached
I Hope this doesn't mean that the thread will die

i dont wanna die anytime soon homu

>>281809298
It isn't far off from the bump limit anyway.

poor heart please keep improving

homura liebe