Thread 33492941

Are they right or are they poisoning my brain? I don't know what to think anymore

>>33492941 (OP)
>Is /pol/ and the manosphere right?:
No. /thread

>>33492941 (OP)
sure, and islam is right about women.

/pol/ is the incelsphere. The hivemind chuds are almost never right about anything.

>>33492941 (OP)
I think so. The OKCupid attractiveness study, AlexanderGrace test and that other OKCupid dating test are all pretty damning against women.

There really should be a way for the average man to get a skinny, young girl with some degree of certainty as long as he improves himself. It's the basis for a healthy society. But if women have too high standards, that's not possible. And women, unlike men, don't really need to be physically attracted to their partner; they can grow to love just about anyone they're with for an extended period of time due to their biology.
Men are more limited in that regard, in that if they're not immediately attracted to a woman physically, they likely never will grow to love her.

The only thing people online are right about politically is that bureaucracy is worse than rape, murder, genocide, and slavery. Timothy McVeigh was a hero.

>>33492941 (OP)
Here's a tip, when anyone is giving you advice or telling you things that seem like they were meant to make you feel a specific way and they stand to gain money from doing it, its not always bullshit but keep a skeptical eye

>>33492941 (OP)
>Is /pol/ and the manosphere right?
Right about what? The opinions diverge a lot on /pol/

>>33493047
>The OKCupid attractiveness study
That would be the study that found that men only ever messaged women they rated as highly attractive, while women's chances of messaging a man was almost completely independent of how they rated his photo? That study?

>>33495217
Correct, women message for attention or a quick chat without being interested in a date.

>>33496133
Its very, very telling that incels always only reference internet dating and never ever the real world when alleged "hypergamy is concerned.

To make it clear, internet dating is asetting where you have 10 men on a single woman on average, with the men mostly being abject losers and uglies who cannot score IRL and fell for some marketing ploy that promiese them models delivered to their house free of charge if they participate.

On top, online dating companies also run algorithms that are geared towards suckering said men into paying for their services ,which is mostly done by hiding their profiles from women or assigning them a low internal "rating" as punishment for not paying up.

Considering that barely a single digit percentage of the population participates in internet dating, with a heavy emphasis on shut ins, hideous and mentally ill people it is as far from representative as you can get.

>>33492941 (OP)
>is /pol/ right
Pause for a moment and ask yourself this: "On a Mongolian anime imageboard best known for child pornography, is the political discussion section, best known as the origin of a conspiracy theory about how a reality TV show host will bring a righteous day of judgement on prominent pedophiles who drink childrens' blood to stay young, generally correct about their political analysis?"
>is the manosphere right
I'll save you some time. Here's what they're wrong about
>all wimminz stoopid ebil DA JOOS
>wimminz like, r tards n shiet
>wimminz lov it wen ur an asshole bro
>bro dropshipping its like... its like u ship... its like dropped... and like... Bro ez money
Here's what they're right about:
>if you want a lot of sex, it is in your best interest to make yourself as sexually attractive as possible
>you do this by lifting weights, dressing well, and having good hygiene
>it will help if you're able to hold a conversation
>it will help if you have interests that don't boil down to consoom at screen
>women can smell desperation and it repulses them
Here's what they kinda-sorta get right:
>women like excitement and novelty
Keep things fun and light if you want to hook up. Don't tell her ILY at 2 and call her a bitch at 3.
>women give poor dating advice
Women give very bad advice if you're trying to hook up with a lot of women or just put your toe in the water. Women give good dating advice for dating seriously.
>women are turned off by fear, desperation, and general patheticness
This is mostly true. Generally, in early dating stages, they want you to have the capacity to experience the full spectrum of human emotion, but they don't want to have to deal with the full spectrum of human emotion.
>women are just as visually stimulated as men
60% true, but they're more holistic about attraction than men -- the "avg looking band member drowning in pussy" is a stereotype for a reason, women LOVE it when you're good at something, especially an art form.

>>33492941 (OP)
No
I´ve been there. The real world works very different, those beliefs will at best be a hindrance

>>33500652
Yes, except the good part was generally good advice before the redpill. The redpill is just slop with some toppings here and there, kind of like your dessert of choice from a fast food place

>>33496133
>Correct, women message for attention or a quick chat without being interested in a date.
And where in the study did they establish that? They didn't, is the answer. You're just making shit up to fit your prejudices.

>>33492941 (OP)
They're right stuff and poisoning your brain to make money too

>>33492941 (OP)
I'm not even sure what a manosphere is, I really don't absorb that kind of information. I know anybody who takes advice from people like Andrew Tate are clinically retarded. Those voices just poison the well water for everybody else. I'm on the right of the political spectrum and I hate how people like that poison the minds of young men. I browse pol sometimes, but I would never take advice or opinions from that board.

>>33495149
>>33500518
>>33500652
>>33500723
>>33500739
Very rare to see a good /adv/ thread. Tired of seeing the same fucking "HOW TO GET WOMEN" and "ASK LE OPPOSITE SEX" generals full of retards who legitimately believe they will get relationship advice on an anonymuos mesage board.

>>33492941 (OP)
>Are they right or are they poisoning my brain? I don't know what to think anymore
Right about what? Let's pretend for a second they're 100% right about absolutely everything even the most extreme TRAD AND BASED opinions outside of the Overton window. The correct response to le epic blackpill is not shitposting on 4chan all day, jerking off, and continuing to consuming your goyslop and arguing with people on the internet about the jews.

>>33500652
>Women give good dating advice for dating seriously.
you were doing so well up until this absolute bullshit

>>33500652
>mongolian

MARGE I tthought it was japanese themed founded by amerimutt "moot"?

>>33501124
>jerking off
What can I do about this one? I'm an addict and apparently can't stop

>>33500518
Wasn't there a graph showing us that online dating has become the most common method for finding a partner?

>>33501302
Occupy your time with anything else. That's literally it. Preferably something that improves the white race. Researchers got rats to quit cocaine because they gave them other things to stimulate themselves.

Incels were right about everything, normal people kept denying it but now they're openly saying that they only want to breed with good genes and gave up the you have to self improve platitudes. The only thing that is misguided is the hate towards women themselves instead of nature which made them that way to begin with

>>33501432
>heh I may be a stupid lonely unlikeable retard but at least i won my internet arguments!

>>33492941 (OP)
they've taken over your brain completely. it's already too late. none of this is real.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ibz-gPkTMDM

>>33501454
It's not an internet argument anymore, they shifted the discourse to just saying it's not fair that they have to settle for ugly men/bad genes and are pretending like they never gaslit incels for the past decade

>>33492941 (OP)
Fuck no, pic very much related. I know a lot of IRL poltards and they are all massive losers.

The manosphere gets a lot right on female nature, but I find most guys stop there and never adapt their strategy for actual leverage.

It’s the same in divorce court…guys think “truth” wins…well, it doesn’t. Evidence wins. Frame wins. So does process discipline.

Wrote something breaking down how lawyers really work against you in family court. If you’re going to be blackpilled on women, you might as well be on the legal system too:

https://open.substack.com/pub/masonblakex/p/your-lawyer-is-not-your-friend-fathers-custody-court-strategy

>>33493047
>average man to get a skinny, young girl
The average girl is neither skinny nor young. Your math doesn't check out.

>>33492941 (OP)
Macrocosmically yeah, Israel’s geopolitics are evil and the world is full of whores. Microcosmically no, interpersonal relations can be with anyone and if you’re willing to stand up for yourself and get okay with declinations, they’re not rejections you aren’t a reject you’re just not what they want and that’s their loss, you can find a partner you care about and want to be with forever.

Pre red pill manosphere was just common sense shit you saw your older brother or someone use to pick up pussy. It had nothing to do with money or pure looks. It was mostly confidence and tact, something you need to get pussy to begin with.

>>33492941 (OP)
Yes and no. Don't disregard all the information that comes there but just know that a majority of it is sewage that has been repeated on loop for years at this point.

If you disagree with the majority in /pol/ then you're immediately ostracized. Most of the people there are unhappy and while their reasons are legitimate, the way how they deal with it isn't. Instead of being the change they want to see, the groan and complain incessantly.

Listen, if you're a real human being with the desire to be something greater, I wouldn't advise being around something lesser. There's more good out there than /pol/ and arguably the majority of this site. The best advice you can get here is to leave here.

>>33501432
>Incels (involuntarily celibate, aka, men who title themselves on if they gets laid or not) were right about everything

>>33492941 (OP)
Politics are just a game of twisting words for power.

Redpill is at least in part based on biology. But you should approach this knowledge with hate or resentment, like a naturalist, and accept the world as it is, and use the knowledge to your benefit.

>>33492941 (OP)
They are right that there are problems in society but they are absolute retards in explaining their origins and possible solutions to avoid it getting worse.

>>33492941 (OP)
It’s 99% poisoning your brain.
It’s best to talk to people in real life and do activities in real life. /pol/ is filled with poorly adjusted extremists. It depends on what you include in the “manosphere.” Joe Rogan? Fairly mainstream guy with nuanced opinion on a lot of stuff. Andrew Tate? Woman-hating literal pimp. Just look at the whole spectrum of what many people are saying, including on the other side of the spectrum, and most importantly in between, and you’ll be okay. Keep an open mind about challenging your views and never become dogmatic. Use reason.
If you’re posting this it’s probably a good time to get off the internet for a few weeks. (Off social media I mean, especially 4chan, Reddit, and twitter/X)